Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] dt: bindings: as3645a: Fix the example node

[Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>]

Resent to include DT maintainers

On 12/08/2017 09:55 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Fix the address-cells and size-cells example node
> to reflect to the correct representation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> ---
> 
> v2 - Moved compatible to be first in the node - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10092937/
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt
> index fdc40e354a64..fc7f5f9f234c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt
> @@ -59,10 +59,10 @@ Example
>  =======
>  
>  	as3645a@30 {

Rob

Here is an example of the device name being part of the node name.

Should this be changed as well to leds@30?

Dan

> -		#address-cells: 1
> -		#size-cells: 0
> -		reg = <0x30>;
>  		compatible = "ams,as3645a";
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <0>;
> +		reg = <0x30>;
>  		flash@0 {
>  			reg = <0x0>;
>  			flash-timeout-us = <150000>;
> 


-- 
------------------
Dan Murphy