Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: Remove condition with no effect

[Jiaxin Yu <jiaxin.yu@mediatek.com>]

On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 10:01 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 08/07/22 04:46, Zhongjun Tan ha scritto:
> > From: Zhongjun Tan <tanzhongjun@coolpad.com>
> > 
> > Remove condition with no effect
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zhongjun Tan <tanzhongjun@coolpad.com>
> > ---
> >   sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c | 2 --
> >   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c
> > b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c
> > index db71b032770d..6be6d4f3b585 100644
> > --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c
> > +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c
> > @@ -295,8 +295,6 @@ static int mtk_adda_pad_top_event(struct
> > snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
> >   	case SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU:
> >   		if (afe_priv->mtkaif_protocol ==
> > MTKAIF_PROTOCOL_2_CLK_P2)
> >   			regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP,
> > 0x39);
> > -		else if (afe_priv->mtkaif_protocol ==
> > MTKAIF_PROTOCOL_2)
> > -			regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP,
> > 0x31);
> 
> I think that this needs some clarification from MediaTek: was 0x31 a
> typo here?
> 
> Regards,
> Angelo
> 
Hi Angelo,

This patch can be accepted. The 0x31 is not typo, the logic of this
code is not concise enough.

Thanks,
Jiaxin.Yu

> >   		else
> >   			regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP,
> > 0x31);
> >   		break;
> 
>