From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [V5 PATCH 00/26] mm, memory-hotplug: dynamic configure movable memory and introduce movable node
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:30:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5090EFA6.6030800@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508FA2F4.1050608@jp.fujitsu.com>
At 10/30/2012 05:50 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
> HI Lai,
>
> The patch-set is huge. Therefore, we hesitate to read the patch-set.
> I think the patch-set has multiple feature developments.
> - Development of online_movable [PATCH 1 - 3]
> - Cleanup node_state_attr [PATCH 4]
> - Introduce N_MEMORY [PATCH 5 - 18]
> - Development of kernelcore_max_addr [PATCH 19 - 25]
> - Bug fix [PATCH 26]
I have splited it to 6 patchsets:
part1: patch 1-3
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135166176108186&w=2
part2: patch 4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135166705909544&w=2
part3: patch 5-18
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135167050510527&w=2
part4: patch 19-20
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135167344211401&w=2
part5: patch 21-25
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135167497312063&w=2
part6: patch 26
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135167512612132&w=2
>
> Why don't you separate the patch-set into each feature development?
> By separating the patch-set, many people can easily participate
> in your development.
>
> Thanks,
> Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
> 2012/10/30 0:07, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> Movable memory is a very important concept of memory-management,
>> we need to consolidate it and make use of it on systems.
>>
>> Movable memory is needed for
>> o anti-fragmentation(hugepage, big-order allocation...)
>> o logic hot-remove(virtualization, Memory capacity on Demand)
>> o physic hot-remove(power-saving, hardware partitioning, hardware fault management)
>>
>> All these require dynamic configuring the memory and making better utilities of memories
>> and safer. We also need physic hot-remove, so we need movable node too.
>> (Although some systems support physic-memory-migration, we don't require all
>> memory on physic-node is movable, but movable node is still needed here
>> for logic-node if we want to make physic-migration is transparent)
>>
>> We add dynamic configuration commands "online_movalbe" and "online_kernel".
>> We also add non-dynamic boot option kernelcore_max_addr.
>> We may add some more dynamic/non-dynamic configuration in future.
>>
>>
>> The patchset is based on 3.7-rc3 with these three patches already applied:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/24/151
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/26/150
>>
>> You can also simply pull all the patches from:
>> git pull https://github.com/laijs/linux.git hotplug-next
>>
>>
>>
>> Issues):
>>
>> mempolicy(M_BIND) don't act well when the nodemask has movable nodes only,
>> the kernel allocation will fail and the task can't create new task or other
>> kernel objects.
>>
>> So we change the strategy/policy
>> when the bound nodemask has movable node(s) only, we only
>> apply mempolicy for userspace allocation, don't apply it
>> for kernel allocation.
>>
>> CPUSET also has the same problem, but the code spread in page_alloc.c,
>> and we doesn't fix it yet, we can/will change allocation strategy to one of
>> these 3 strategies:
>> 1) the same strategy as mempolicy
>> 2) change cpuset, make nodemask always has at least a normal node
>> 3) split nodemask: nodemask_user and nodemask_kernel
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>>
>>
>> Patches):
>>
>> patch1-3: add online_movable and online_kernel, bot don't result movable node
>> Patch4 cleanup for node_state_attr
>> Patch5 introduce N_MEMORY
>> Patch6-17 use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY.
>> The patches are separated by subsystem,
>> Patch18 also changes the node_states initialization
>> Patch18-20 Add MOVABLE-dedicated node
>> Patch21-25 Add kernelcore_max_addr
>> patch26: mempolicy handle movable node
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Changes):
>>
>> change V5-V4:
>> consolidate online_movable/online_kernel
>> nodemask management
>>
>> change V4-v3
>> rebase.
>> online_movable/online_kernel can create a zone from empty
>> or empyt a zone
>>
>> change V3-v2:
>> Proper nodemask management
>>
>> change V2-V1:
>>
>> The original V1 patchset of MOVABLE-dedicated node is here:
>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/78122
>>
>> The new V2 adds N_MEMORY and a notion of "MOVABLE-dedicated node".
>> And fix some related problems.
>>
>> The orignal V1 patchset of "add online_movable" is here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/4/145
>>
>> The new V2 discards the MIGRATE_HOTREMOVE approach, and use a more straight
>> implementation(only 1 patch).
>>
>>
>>
>> Lai Jiangshan (22):
>> mm, memory-hotplug: dynamic configure movable memory and portion
>> memory
>> memory_hotplug: handle empty zone when online_movable/online_kernel
>> memory_hotplug: ensure every online node has NORMAL memory
>> node: cleanup node_state_attr
>> node_states: introduce N_MEMORY
>> cpuset: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY
>> procfs: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY
>> memcontrol: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY
>> oom: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY
>> mm,migrate: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY
>> mempolicy: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY
>> hugetlb: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY
>> vmstat: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY
>> kthread: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY
>> init: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY
>> vmscan: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY
>> page_alloc: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY change the node_states
>> initialization
>> hotplug: update nodemasks management
>> numa: add CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE for movable-dedicated node
>> memory_hotplug: allow online/offline memory to result movable node
>> page_alloc: add kernelcore_max_addr
>> mempolicy: fix is_valid_nodemask()
>>
>> Yasuaki Ishimatsu (4):
>> x86: get pg_data_t's memory from other node
>> x86: use memblock_set_current_limit() to set memblock.current_limit
>> memblock: limit memory address from memblock
>> memblock: compare current_limit with end variable at
>> memblock_find_in_range_node()
>>
>> Documentation/cgroups/cpusets.txt | 2 +-
>> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 9 +
>> Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt | 19 ++-
>> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4 +-
>> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 4 +-
>> arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 8 +-
>> drivers/base/memory.c | 27 ++--
>> drivers/base/node.c | 28 ++--
>> fs/proc/kcore.c | 2 +-
>> fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 4 +-
>> include/linux/cpuset.h | 2 +-
>> include/linux/memblock.h | 1 +
>> include/linux/memory.h | 1 +
>> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 13 ++-
>> include/linux/nodemask.h | 5 +
>> init/main.c | 2 +-
>> kernel/cpuset.c | 32 ++--
>> kernel/kthread.c | 2 +-
>> mm/Kconfig | 8 +
>> mm/hugetlb.c | 24 ++--
>> mm/memblock.c | 10 +-
>> mm/memcontrol.c | 18 +-
>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 283 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> mm/mempolicy.c | 48 ++++---
>> mm/migrate.c | 2 +-
>> mm/oom_kill.c | 2 +-
>> mm/page_alloc.c | 76 +++++++---
>> mm/page_cgroup.c | 2 +-
>> mm/vmscan.c | 4 +-
>> mm/vmstat.c | 4 +-
>> 30 files changed, 508 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
>>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-31 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-29 15:07 Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:07 ` [V5 PATCH 01/26] mm, memory-hotplug: dynamic configure movable memory and portion memory Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:20 ` [V5 PATCH 02/26] memory_hotplug: handle empty zone when online_movable/online_kernel Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:20 ` [V5 PATCH 03/26] memory_hotplug: ensure every online node has NORMAL memory Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:20 ` [V5 PATCH 04/26] node: cleanup node_state_attr Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:20 ` [V5 PATCH 05/26] node_states: introduce N_MEMORY Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 20:46 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-31 7:03 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-29 15:20 ` [V5 PATCH 06/26] cpuset: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:20 ` [V5 PATCH 07/26] procfs: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:20 ` [V5 PATCH 08/26] memcontrol: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 16:22 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-29 20:40 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-29 20:58 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-29 21:08 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-29 21:34 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-31 13:18 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-29 15:20 ` [V5 PATCH 09/26] oom: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:21 ` [V5 PATCH 10/26] mm,migrate: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:21 ` [V5 PATCH 11/26] mempolicy: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:21 ` [V5 PATCH 12/26] hugetlb: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:21 ` [V5 PATCH 13/26] vmstat: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:21 ` [V5 PATCH 14/26] kthread: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:21 ` [V5 PATCH 15/26] init: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:21 ` [V5 PATCH 16/26] vmscan: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:21 ` [V5 PATCH 17/26] page_alloc: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY change the node_states initialization Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:21 ` [V5 PATCH 18/26] hotplug: update nodemasks management Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:21 ` [V5 PATCH 19/26] numa: add CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE for movable-dedicated node Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:21 ` [V5 PATCH 20/26] memory_hotplug: allow online/offline memory to result movable node Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:21 ` [V5 PATCH 21/26] page_alloc: add kernelcore_max_addr Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:21 ` [V5 PATCH 22/26] x86: get pg_data_t's memory from other node Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:21 ` [V5 PATCH 23/26] x86: use memblock_set_current_limit() to set memblock.current_limit Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:21 ` [V5 PATCH 24/26] memblock: limit memory address from memblock Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:21 ` [V5 PATCH 25/26] memblock: compare current_limit with end variable at memblock_find_in_range_node() Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-29 15:21 ` [V5 PATCH 26/26] mempolicy: fix is_valid_nodemask() Lai Jiangshan
2012-10-30 9:50 ` [V5 PATCH 00/26] mm, memory-hotplug: dynamic configure movable memory and introduce movable node Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-31 9:30 ` Wen Congyang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5090EFA6.6030800@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome