mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<sboyd@kernel.org>, <rafael@kernel.org>, <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] devcoredump : Serialize devcd_del work
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 20:23:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50bb39d7-8207-31e2-0a7d-99c5d2b3c8a8@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YrmsggY7L6E+LWJ+@kroah.com>

Thanks @greg.

Hi @johannes,

Could you review this patch?

-Mukesh

On 6/27/2022 6:41 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 07:33:40PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>> In following scenario(diagram), when one thread X running dev_coredumpm()
>> adds devcd device to the framework which sends uevent notification to
>> userspace and another thread Y reads this uevent and call to
>> devcd_data_write() which eventually try to delete the queued timer that
>> is not initialized/queued yet.
>>
>> So, debug object reports some warning and in the meantime, timer is
>> initialized and queued from X path. and from Y path, it gets reinitialized
>> again and timer->entry.pprev=NULL and try_to_grab_pending() stucks.
>>
>> To fix this, introduce mutex and a boolean flag to serialize the behaviour.
>>
>>   	cpu0(X)			                cpu1(Y)
>>
>>      dev_coredump() uevent sent to user space
>>      device_add()  ======================> user space process Y reads the
>>                                            uevents writes to devcd fd
>>                                            which results into writes to
>>
>>                                           devcd_data_write()
>>                                             mod_delayed_work()
>>                                               try_to_grab_pending()
>>                                                 del_timer()
>>                                                   debug_assert_init()
>>     INIT_DELAYED_WORK()
>>     schedule_delayed_work()
>>                                                     debug_object_fixup()
>>                                                       timer_fixup_assert_init()
>>                                                         timer_setup()
>>                                                           do_init_timer()
>>                                                         /*
>>                                                          Above call reinitializes
>>                                                          the timer to
>>                                                          timer->entry.pprev=NULL
>>                                                          and this will be checked
>>                                                          later in timer_pending() call.
>>                                                         */
>>                                                   timer_pending()
>>                                                    !hlist_unhashed_lockless(&timer->entry)
>>                                                      !h->pprev
>>                                                  /*
>>                                                    del_timer() checks h->pprev and finds
>>                                                    it to be NULL due to which
>>                                                    try_to_grab_pending() stucks.
>>                                                  */
>>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2e1f81e2-428c-f11f-ce92-eb11048cb271@quicinc.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
>> ---
> 
> I need an ack from the devcoredump maintainer before I can take this...
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-01 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-27 14:03 Mukesh Ojha
2022-06-27 12:33 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-06-27 13:11 ` Greg KH
2022-07-01 14:53   ` Mukesh Ojha [this message]
2022-07-20 12:33     ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-08-11 16:13 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-08-16 20:23   ` Kees Cook
2022-08-24  7:22     ` Mukesh Ojha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50bb39d7-8207-31e2-0a7d-99c5d2b3c8a8@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_mojha@quicinc.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®