mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<sboyd@kernel.org>, <rafael@kernel.org>, <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] devcoredump : Serialize devcd_del work
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 18:03:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d95c4715-c194-759b-b698-c548a771f27c@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50bb39d7-8207-31e2-0a7d-99c5d2b3c8a8@quicinc.com>

Gentle reminder for review.

-Mukesh

On 7/1/2022 8:23 PM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> Thanks @greg.
> 
> Hi @johannes,
> 
> Could you review this patch?
> 
> -Mukesh
> 
> On 6/27/2022 6:41 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 07:33:40PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>>> In following scenario(diagram), when one thread X running 
>>> dev_coredumpm()
>>> adds devcd device to the framework which sends uevent notification to
>>> userspace and another thread Y reads this uevent and call to
>>> devcd_data_write() which eventually try to delete the queued timer that
>>> is not initialized/queued yet.
>>>
>>> So, debug object reports some warning and in the meantime, timer is
>>> initialized and queued from X path. and from Y path, it gets 
>>> reinitialized
>>> again and timer->entry.pprev=NULL and try_to_grab_pending() stucks.
>>>
>>> To fix this, introduce mutex and a boolean flag to serialize the 
>>> behaviour.
>>>
>>>       cpu0(X)                            cpu1(Y)
>>>
>>>      dev_coredump() uevent sent to user space
>>>      device_add()  ======================> user space process Y reads 
>>> the
>>>                                            uevents writes to devcd fd
>>>                                            which results into writes to
>>>
>>>                                           devcd_data_write()
>>>                                             mod_delayed_work()
>>>                                               try_to_grab_pending()
>>>                                                 del_timer()
>>>                                                   debug_assert_init()
>>>     INIT_DELAYED_WORK()
>>>     schedule_delayed_work()
>>>                                                     debug_object_fixup()
>>>                                                       
>>> timer_fixup_assert_init()
>>>                                                         timer_setup()
>>>                                                           
>>> do_init_timer()
>>>                                                         /*
>>>                                                          Above call 
>>> reinitializes
>>>                                                          the timer to
>>>                                                          
>>> timer->entry.pprev=NULL
>>>                                                          and this 
>>> will be checked
>>>                                                          later in 
>>> timer_pending() call.
>>>                                                         */
>>>                                                   timer_pending()
>>>                                                    
>>> !hlist_unhashed_lockless(&timer->entry)
>>>                                                      !h->pprev
>>>                                                  /*
>>>                                                    del_timer() checks 
>>> h->pprev and finds
>>>                                                    it to be NULL due 
>>> to which
>>>                                                    
>>> try_to_grab_pending() stucks.
>>>                                                  */
>>>
>>> Link: 
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2e1f81e2-428c-f11f-ce92-eb11048cb271@quicinc.com/ 
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> I need an ack from the devcoredump maintainer before I can take this...
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-20 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-27 14:03 Mukesh Ojha
2022-06-27 12:33 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-06-27 13:11 ` Greg KH
2022-07-01 14:53   ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-07-20 12:33     ` Mukesh Ojha [this message]
2022-08-11 16:13 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-08-16 20:23   ` Kees Cook
2022-08-24  7:22     ` Mukesh Ojha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d95c4715-c194-759b-b698-c548a771f27c@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_mojha@quicinc.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®