mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
Cc: "Jörg Rödel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: IOMMU/AMD: Error Handling
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:49:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <517FD9E8.8070802@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <517ED3A9.2050508@redhat.com>

On 4/29/2013 3:10 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
> On 04/29/2013 03:45 PM, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
>> Joerg,
>>
>> We are in the process of implementing AMD IOMMU error handling, and I 
>> would like some comments from you and the community.
>>
>> Currently, the AMD IOMMU driver only reports events from the event 
>> log in the dmesg, and does not try to handle them in case of errors. 
>> AMD IOMMU errors can be categorized as device-specific errors and 
>> IOMMU errors.
>>
>> 1. For IOMMU errors such as:
>> - DEV_TAB_HADWARE_ERROR
>> - PAGE_TAB_ERROR
>> - COMMAND_HARDWARE_ERROR
>> If the error is detected during IOMMU initialization, we could 
>> disable IOMMU and proceed. If the error occurs after IOMMU is 
>> initialized, we won't be able to recover from this, and might need to 
>> result in panic.
>>
>> 2. For device-specific errors such as:
>> - ILLEGAL_DEV_TABLE_ENTRY
>> - IO_PAGE_FAULT
>> - INVALDE_DEVICE_REQUEST
>> We think the AMD IOMMU driver should try to isolate the device. This 
>> involves blocking device transactions at IOMMU DTE and tries to 
>> disable the device (e.g. calling the remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) 
>> interface generally provides by device drivers). This could prevents 
>> the device from continuing to fail and to risk of system instability.
>>
> disabling the device is not an option.
> We've seen mis-configured ACPI tables generate storms
> of invalide dte messages after iommu setup but before they are cleared 
> up when
> the OS driver is started & resets the device. The original storm is 
> from bios-use
> of IOMMU with a device.
Would some sorts of threshold to help determine the badness of errors 
might be sufficient? For instance, if the device has generated N errors, 
it is then be removed (where N is tunable through sysfs or kernel boot 
options).

> I'd recommend creating a filter that prevents further logging from a 
> device
> for 5 mins at a time if a storm of DTE-related errors are seen.
> by definition, the DMA is blocked from corrupting/changing memory, so 
> isolation has been established;
> keeping the failure log from consuming the system is the needed fix.

I believe the IOMMU hardware can be configured to suppress logging of subsequent I/O page fault errors until
the device table cache is cleared.  This should help avoiding storm of interrupts you are seeing.

>
>> 3. In case of posted memory write transaction, device driver might 
>> not be aware that the transaction has failed and blocked at IOMMU. If 
>> there is no HW IOMMU, I believe this is handled by PCI error handling 
>> code. If the IOMMU hardware reporth such case, could this potentially 
>> leverage the Linux IOMMU fault handling interface, 
>> iommu_set_fault_handler() and report_iommu_fault(), to communicate to 
>> device driver or PCI driver?
>>
> Wondering if you could use AER-like callback mechanism so a driver can 
> be invoked when IOMMU error occurs,
> so the device driver can quiesce or reset the device if it deems it 
> transient.
That might also be possible. I might need to look into it more.

Suravee
>
>> Any feedback or comments are appreciated.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Suravee
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> iommu mailing list
>> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
>
>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-30 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-29 19:45 Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-04-29 20:10 ` Don Dutile
2013-04-29 20:34   ` Duran, Leo
2013-04-29 21:42     ` Don Dutile
2013-04-29 22:31       ` Duran, Leo
2013-04-30 14:56       ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-04-30 15:09         ` Don Dutile
2013-04-30 15:21         ` Joerg Roedel
2013-04-30 14:49   ` Suravee Suthikulanit [this message]
2013-04-30 15:06     ` Don Dutile
2013-04-30 16:02       ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=517FD9E8.8070802@amd.com \
    --to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®