From: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
To: Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Cc: "Duran, Leo" <leo.duran@amd.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: IOMMU/AMD: Error Handling
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:09:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <517FDE94.7080700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <517FDB96.7060602@amd.com>
On 04/30/2013 10:56 AM, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
> On 4/29/2013 4:42 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
>> On 04/29/2013 04:34 PM, Duran, Leo wrote:
>>> I'm wondering if resetting the IOMMU at init-time (once) would clear any BIOS induced noise.
>>> Leo
>>>
>> Well, depends what you mean by 'reset'....
>> (a) setting it up for OS use is effectively a reset, but doesn't quiesce a device
>> doing dma reads of a (bios-setup) queue. then the noisy messages begin
>> (b) disable the iommu, and then the dma just occurs... and bad for writes, potentially.
>>
>> Similar issue is being reported & worked for kdump, where device are still
>> doing DMA while the system is trying to 'reset' to the kexec'd kernel, and
>> take a crash dump.
>>
>> Solution: stop devices from doing dma... but some you _want_ enabled throughout...
>> like keyboard & mouse via usb controller, so you get to pick os from
>> grub... not so for kexec...
>>
>> so, again, for isolation faults.... let the hw do its job -- isolate
>> and throttle/silence the fault messages on a per-device, time-duration heuristic
>> so the system can get through boot-up where enough OS is init'd (drivers started)
>> to stop the temporary noise.
> This sounds more like issue with the order of how things are initialized in the system.
> If so, could we separate the code which enabling of IOMMU error logging/handling and
> delay it until we are certain that systems are stable?
>
So, you are proposing we not enable fault events when IOMMU is initially configured;
use the IOMMU through boot/driver-config, hoping all is well, and if not, continue blindly,
and then enable IOMMU faults post/late-init ?
> Suravee
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-30 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-29 19:45 Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-04-29 20:10 ` Don Dutile
2013-04-29 20:34 ` Duran, Leo
2013-04-29 21:42 ` Don Dutile
2013-04-29 22:31 ` Duran, Leo
2013-04-30 14:56 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-04-30 15:09 ` Don Dutile [this message]
2013-04-30 15:21 ` Joerg Roedel
2013-04-30 14:49 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-04-30 15:06 ` Don Dutile
2013-04-30 16:02 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=517FDE94.7080700@redhat.com \
--to=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=leo.duran@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®