mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.10-rc6
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:48:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51BF7610.10803@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130617133055.20463ce157e104af15ef60a1@linux-foundation.org>

On 06/17/2013 01:30 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
[...]
>
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Subject: include/linux/smp.h:on_each_cpu(): switch back to a macro
>
> f21afc25f9ed4 ("smp.h: Use local_irq_{save,restore}() in !SMP version of
> on_each_cpu()") converted on_each_cpu() to a C function.  This required
> inclusion of irqflags.h, which broke ia64 and mn10300 (at least) due to
> header ordering hell.
>
> Switch on_each_cpu() back to a macro to fix this.

FYI:  I have already sent a pair of patches that fix the include 
dependencies:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/16/113
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/17/422

Obviously, it is Linus' choice as to how best to handle the failure, but 
I think it is important to know that there are two options (fixing ia64 
and mn10300, or reverting the patch).

David Daney



>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
>
>   include/linux/smp.h |   20 ++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN include/linux/smp.h~include-linux-smph-on_each_cpu-switch-back-to-a-macro include/linux/smp.h
> --- a/include/linux/smp.h~include-linux-smph-on_each_cpu-switch-back-to-a-macro
> +++ a/include/linux/smp.h
> @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
>   #include <linux/list.h>
>   #include <linux/cpumask.h>
>   #include <linux/init.h>
> -#include <linux/irqflags.h>
>
>   extern void cpu_idle(void);
>
> @@ -140,17 +139,14 @@ static inline int up_smp_call_function(s
>   }
>   #define smp_call_function(func, info, wait) \
>   			(up_smp_call_function(func, info))
> -
> -static inline int on_each_cpu(smp_call_func_t func, void *info, int wait)
> -{
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
> -	local_irq_save(flags);
> -	func(info);
> -	local_irq_restore(flags);
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> +#define on_each_cpu(func,info,wait)		\
> +	({					\
> +		unsigned long flags;		\
> +		local_irq_save(flags);		\
> +		func(info);			\
> +		local_irq_restore(flags);	\
> +		0;				\
> +	})
>   /*
>    * Note we still need to test the mask even for UP
>    * because we actually can get an empty mask from
> _
>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-17 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-15 22:12 Linus Torvalds
2013-06-16  8:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-06-16 18:01   ` Linus Torvalds
2013-06-17 20:30     ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-17 20:48       ` David Daney [this message]
2013-06-17 20:59         ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-17 21:08           ` David Daney
2013-06-17 21:13             ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-17 21:26               ` David Daney
2013-06-17 21:38                 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-18  8:37                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-06-19 16:57                   ` David Daney
2013-06-17 21:22       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-06-16 12:37 ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-06-16 12:52   ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 13:45     ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-06-16 18:09   ` Linus Torvalds
2013-06-16 18:28     ` Linus Torvalds
2013-06-16 22:18       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-06-16 18:51     ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-06-16 19:51       ` Al Viro
2013-06-20  3:14         ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-16 19:26     ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51BF7610.10803@caviumnetworks.com \
    --to=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome