From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.10-rc6
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:57:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C1E2EF.7020106@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130617143851.480d327256b7cb54f292e147@linux-foundation.org>
On 06/17/2013 02:38 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:26:01 -0700 David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
>
>> On 06/17/2013 02:13 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:08:13 -0700 David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think switch-back-to-a-macro is simplest and safest for now. Perhaps
>>>>> you can queue a 3.11 patch which restores the C function and fixes up
>>>>> mn10300 and ia64?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If the patch is reverted, I will do that.
>>>
>>> I'm not proposing that we revert f21afc25f9ed4. Retain its
>>> functionality, but do it via a macro for 3.10.
FYI, these two commits:
c0691143dfe (mn10300: Fix include dependency in irqflags.h et al.)
f75773103d2 ([IA64] Fix include dependency in asm/irqflags.h)
... seem to fix all known breakage related to this issue. So, the patch
(to convert back to a macro) may not be necessary.
Sorry to create all this late -rc churn,
David Daney
>>>
>>
>> I misread your patch. Your patch may be incorrect in that the flags
>> variable you introduce has name space collisions with code using the
>> macro. Linus found this exact problem with the first version of my
>> patch (which was identical to your patch).
>
> Sigh. Macros do so suck.
>
> --- a/include/linux/smp.h~include-linux-smph-on_each_cpu-switch-back-to-a-macro
> +++ a/include/linux/smp.h
> @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
> #include <linux/list.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> -#include <linux/irqflags.h>
>
> extern void cpu_idle(void);
>
> @@ -140,17 +139,14 @@ static inline int up_smp_call_function(s
> }
> #define smp_call_function(func, info, wait) \
> (up_smp_call_function(func, info))
> -
> -static inline int on_each_cpu(smp_call_func_t func, void *info, int wait)
> -{
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> - func(info);
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> +#define on_each_cpu(func, info, wait) \
> + ({ \
> + unsigned long __flags; \
> + local_irq_save(__flags); \
> + func(info); \
> + local_irq_restore(__flags); \
> + 0; \
> + })
> /*
> * Note we still need to test the mask even for UP
> * because we actually can get an empty mask from
> _
>
>> Once you fix the name of 'flags', I hope you don't run into the same
>> Include Hell on ia64 and mn10300 that I did.
>
> I build-tested ia64. I don't have an mn10300 cross-compiler set up.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-19 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-15 22:12 Linus Torvalds
2013-06-16 8:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-06-16 18:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-06-17 20:30 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-17 20:48 ` David Daney
2013-06-17 20:59 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-17 21:08 ` David Daney
2013-06-17 21:13 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-17 21:26 ` David Daney
2013-06-17 21:38 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-18 8:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-06-19 16:57 ` David Daney [this message]
2013-06-17 21:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-06-16 12:37 ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-06-16 12:52 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 13:45 ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-06-16 18:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-06-16 18:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-06-16 22:18 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-06-16 18:51 ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-06-16 19:51 ` Al Viro
2013-06-20 3:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-16 19:26 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C1E2EF.7020106@caviumnetworks.com \
--to=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome