From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Stephen Warren" <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"Grant Likely" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"Rob Herring" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: remove slew-rate parameter from tz1090
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:57:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C9AFC4.1020305@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdaVsKCNzQ9zAG5DXfDO2BFpcCzw5VbmARazOrXCW1kmeQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 25/06/13 14:22, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Can't we just try to come up with a patch that nails down the meaning of
> slew rate in some meaningful manner then?
>
> So according to:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slew_rate
> a proper expression for slew rate would be dV/dt i.e.
> something like microvolts per microsecond (which then just
> becomes volts/second).
>
> What we need to figure out is what range will be applicable within
> reasonable doubt for current scenarios and the next few years.
>
> What are your datasheets specifying here, and what would be
> a proper measure?
My datasheet says:
0: slow (half frequency)
1: fast
I just got a reply back from a hardware engineer, who said that the
relationship with the actual volts/usec will depend on both the drive
strength and the load on the pad, and that a definite answer probably
requires running a simulation.
Cheers
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-25 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-25 12:55 [PATCH 0/4] Fix more issues with generic pinconf bindings Heiko Stübner
2013-06-25 12:55 ` [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: more clarifications for generic pull configs Heiko Stübner
2013-06-25 13:14 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-25 12:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: set unit for debounce time pinconfig to usec Heiko Stübner
2013-06-25 13:15 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-25 12:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: remove slew-rate parameter from tz1090 Heiko Stübner
2013-06-25 13:05 ` James Hogan
2013-06-25 13:21 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-25 13:27 ` James Hogan
2013-06-25 13:32 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-25 13:50 ` James Hogan
2013-06-25 15:39 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-25 21:40 ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-25 13:22 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-25 14:57 ` James Hogan [this message]
2013-06-25 21:46 ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-27 8:32 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-25 12:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] pinctrl: remove bindings for pinconf options needing more thought Heiko Stübner
2013-06-25 13:34 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-25 13:16 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix more issues with generic pinconf bindings James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C9AFC4.1020305@imgtec.com \
--to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome