From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
<containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: memcg creates an unkillable task in 3.2-rc2
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:58:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F71DE2.4020102@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r4eh70yg.fsf@xmission.com>
> I am also seeing what looks like a leak somewhere in the cgroup code as
> well. After some runs of the same reproducer I get into a state where
> after everything is clean up. All of the control groups have been
> removed and the cgroup filesystem is unmounted, I can mount a cgroup
> filesystem with that same combindation of subsystems, but I can't mount
> a cgroup filesystem with any of those subsystems in any other
> combination. So I am guessing that the superblock is from the original
> mounting is still lingering for some reason.
>
If this happens again, you can check /proc/cgroups,
#subsys_name hierarchy num_cgroups enabled
cpuset 0 1 1
debug 0 1 1
cpu 0 1 1
cpuacct 0 1 1
memory 0 1 1
devices 0 1 1
freezer 0 1 1
blkio 0 1 1
If "hierachy" is not 0, then it didn't really unmounted. If "num_cgroups"
is not 1, then there're some cgroups not really destroyed though they've
been rmdired.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-30 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-23 17:47 [GIT PULL] cgroup changes for 3.11-rc2 Tejun Heo
2013-07-29 0:42 ` memcg creates an unkillable task in 3.2-rc2 Eric W. Biederman
2013-07-29 7:59 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-29 8:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-07-29 9:51 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-29 10:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-07-29 16:10 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-29 17:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-07-29 17:20 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-29 18:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-07-29 18:17 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-29 18:13 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-29 18:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-07-30 1:58 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2013-07-30 8:19 ` memcg creates an unkillable task in 3.11-rc2 Eric W. Biederman
2013-07-30 12:31 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-30 16:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-07-31 7:37 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-31 12:10 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-31 22:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-01 9:06 ` Michal Hocko
2013-09-05 9:56 ` Michal Hocko
2013-09-06 18:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-09-09 8:31 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-30 16:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-09-26 23:41 ` Fabio Kung
2013-09-27 0:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-12 16:00 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F71DE2.4020102@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome