From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] remoteproc/davinci: use the reset framework
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:30:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51e33d41-37b1-9e88-4a13-503bb39e2e40@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180327092031.11251-8-brgl@bgdev.pl>
Hi Bart,
On 03/27/2018 04:20 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
>
> Switch to using the reset framework instead of handcoded reset routines
> we used so far.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c
> index b668e32996e2..788f59809c02 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/reset.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> @@ -20,8 +21,6 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
>
> -#include <mach/clock.h> /* for davinci_clk_reset_assert/deassert() */
> -
> #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
>
> static char *da8xx_fw_name;
> @@ -72,6 +71,7 @@ struct da8xx_rproc {
> struct da8xx_rproc_mem *mem;
> int num_mems;
> struct clk *dsp_clk;
> + struct reset_control *dsp_reset;
> void (*ack_fxn)(struct irq_data *data);
> struct irq_data *irq_data;
> void __iomem *chipsig;
> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> struct da8xx_rproc *drproc = (struct da8xx_rproc *)rproc->priv;
> struct clk *dsp_clk = drproc->dsp_clk;
> + struct reset_control *dsp_reset = drproc->dsp_reset;
> int ret;
>
> /* hw requires the start (boot) address be on 1KB boundary */
> @@ -155,7 +156,12 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - davinci_clk_reset_deassert(dsp_clk);
> + ret = reset_control_deassert(dsp_reset);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "reset_control_deassert() failed: %d\n", ret);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(dsp_clk);
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -163,8 +169,15 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> static int da8xx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> {
> struct da8xx_rproc *drproc = rproc->priv;
> + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = reset_control_assert(drproc->dsp_reset);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "reset_control_assert() failed: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> - davinci_clk_reset_assert(drproc->dsp_clk);
> clk_disable_unprepare(drproc->dsp_clk);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -232,6 +245,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct resource *bootreg_res;
> struct resource *chipsig_res;
> struct clk *dsp_clk;
> + struct reset_control *dsp_reset;
> void __iomem *chipsig;
> void __iomem *bootreg;
> int irq;
> @@ -268,6 +282,15 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(dsp_clk);
> }
>
> + dsp_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(dsp_reset)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(dsp_reset) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to get reset control: %ld\n",
> + PTR_ERR(dsp_reset));
> +
> + return PTR_ERR(dsp_reset);
> + }
> +
> if (dev->of_node) {
> ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init(dev);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -309,7 +332,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * *not* in reset, but da8xx_rproc_start() needs the DSP to be
> * held in reset at the time it is called.
> */
> - ret = davinci_clk_reset_assert(drproc->dsp_clk);
> + ret = reset_control_assert(dsp_reset);
> if (ret)
> goto free_rproc;
>
Tested your previous branch, need one more change in this patch to have
the remoteproc boot be actually executing some code. The acquired
dsp_reset is not stored in the drproc, so the start and stop were not
effective. The issue was masked because reset_control_assert() and
deassert() return 0 when a NULL pointer is passed in.
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c
@@ -311,6 +311,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device
*pdev)
drproc = rproc->priv;
drproc->rproc = rproc;
drproc->dsp_clk = dsp_clk;
+ drproc->dsp_reset = dsp_reset;
rproc->has_iommu = false;
regards
Suman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-28 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-27 9:20 [PATCH v3 0/8] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using " Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ARM: davinci: dts: make psc0 a reset provider Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] ARM: davinci: dts: add a reset control to the dsp node Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] clk: davinci: add a reset lookup table for psc0 Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] remoteproc/davinci: add the missing retval check for clk_enable() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] remoteproc/davinci: prepare and unprepare the clock where needed Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] remoteproc/davinci: use octal permissions for module_param() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-28 22:20 ` Suman Anna
2018-03-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] remoteproc/davinci: use the reset framework Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-28 22:30 ` Suman Anna [this message]
2018-03-29 7:16 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] clk: davinci: kill davinci_clk_reset_assert/deassert() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-27 9:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework Philipp Zabel
2018-03-27 16:48 ` David Lechner
2018-03-30 11:07 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-28 22:41 ` Suman Anna
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51e33d41-37b1-9e88-4a13-503bb39e2e40@ti.com \
--to=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=david@lechnology.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®