From: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 11:48:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6166e140-b417-dd22-10cf-843db3958226@lechnology.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180327092031.11251-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
Wasn't there a v4 already? Is this really v5 instead of v3?
On 03/27/2018 04:20 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
>
> This series converts the only user of the handcoded, mach-specific reset
> routines in the davinci platform to using the reset framework.
>
> Patches 1-3 add necessary lookups/DT-properties.
Should I just squash the DT changes into my common-clock-v9 branch
since those patches haven't been picked up yet anyway? That will be
2 fewer patches to keep track of.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-27 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-27 9:20 Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ARM: davinci: dts: make psc0 a reset provider Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] ARM: davinci: dts: add a reset control to the dsp node Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] clk: davinci: add a reset lookup table for psc0 Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] remoteproc/davinci: add the missing retval check for clk_enable() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] remoteproc/davinci: prepare and unprepare the clock where needed Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] remoteproc/davinci: use octal permissions for module_param() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-28 22:20 ` Suman Anna
2018-03-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] remoteproc/davinci: use the reset framework Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-28 22:30 ` Suman Anna
2018-03-29 7:16 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-27 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] clk: davinci: kill davinci_clk_reset_assert/deassert() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-27 9:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework Philipp Zabel
2018-03-27 16:48 ` David Lechner [this message]
2018-03-30 11:07 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-28 22:41 ` Suman Anna
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-03-23 11:47 Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6166e140-b417-dd22-10cf-843db3958226@lechnology.com \
--to=david@lechnology.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®