mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
To: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>, Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] clk: Introduce davinci clocks
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 17:58:29 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <521d77e1-1375-7ef0-4ef5-d8a3401d1b73@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42102b7d-4e3c-d5fc-b0db-48a1203757ba@lechnology.com>

On Wednesday 03 January 2018 03:01 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> Forgot to cc linux-clk, so doing that now...
> 
> 
> On 12/31/2017 05:39 PM, David Lechner wrote:
>> This introduces new drivers for arch/arm/mach-davinci. The code is based
>> on the clock drivers from there and adapted to use the common clock
>> framework.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/clk/Makefile                      |   1 +
>>   drivers/clk/davinci/Makefile              |   3 +
>>   drivers/clk/davinci/da8xx-cfgchip-clk.c   | 380
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c                 | 333
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c                 | 217 +++++++++++++++++
>>   include/linux/clk/davinci.h               |  46 ++++
>>   include/linux/platform_data/davinci_clk.h |  25 ++
>>   7 files changed, 1005 insertions(+)

This is a pretty huge patch and I think each of cfgchip, pll and PSC
clocks deserve a patch of their own.

On the PLL patch, please describe how the PLL implementation on DaVinci
is different from Keystone, so no reuse is really possible. Similarly
for the PSC patch (no non-DT support in keystone etc).

>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..8ae85ee
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@

>> +static void psc_config(struct davinci_psc_clk *psc,
>> +               enum davinci_psc_state next_state)
>> +{
>> +    u32 epcpr, ptcmd, pdstat, pdctl, mdstat, mdctl, ptstat;
>> +
>> +    mdctl = readl(psc->base + MDCTL + 4 * psc->lpsc);
>> +    mdctl &= ~MDSTAT_STATE_MASK;
>> +    mdctl |= next_state;
>> +    /* TODO: old davinci clocks for da850 set MDCTL_FORCE bit for
>> sata and
>> +     * dsp here. Is this really needed?
>> +     */
>> +    writel(mdctl, psc->base + MDCTL + 4 * psc->lpsc);
>> +
>> +    pdstat = readl(psc->base + PDSTAT + 4 * psc->pd);
>> +    if ((pdstat & PDSTAT_STATE_MASK) == 0) {
>> +        pdctl = readl(psc->base + PDSTAT + 4 * psc->pd);
>> +        pdctl |= PDCTL_NEXT;
>> +        writel(pdctl, psc->base + PDSTAT + 4 * psc->pd);
>> +
>> +        ptcmd = BIT(psc->pd);
>> +        writel(ptcmd, psc->base + PTCMD);
>> +
>> +        do {
>> +            epcpr = __raw_readl(psc->base + EPCPR);
>> +        } while (!(epcpr & BIT(psc->pd)));
>> +
>> +        pdctl = __raw_readl(psc->base + PDCTL + 4 * psc->pd);
>> +        pdctl |= PDCTL_EPCGOOD;
>> +        __raw_writel(pdctl, psc->base + PDCTL + 4 * psc->pd);

Can we shift to regmap here too? Then the polling loops like above can
be converted to regmap_read_poll_timeout() too like you have done elsewhere.

Thanks,
Sekhar

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-04 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-31 23:39 [PATCH v4 0/7] ARM: davinci: convert to common clock framework​ David Lechner
2017-12-31 23:39 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] ARM: davinci: move davinci_clk_init() to init_time David Lechner
2017-12-31 23:39 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] ARM: davinci: don't use static clk_lookup David Lechner
2018-01-04 11:10   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-01-04 17:43     ` David Lechner
2017-12-31 23:39 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] ARM: davinci: fix duplicate clocks David Lechner
2018-01-04 11:12   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-01-04 17:44     ` David Lechner
2017-12-31 23:39 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] ARM: davinci: remove davinci_set_refclk_rate() David Lechner
2017-12-31 23:39 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] clk: Introduce davinci clocks David Lechner
2018-01-01  0:23   ` David Lechner
2018-01-02 21:31   ` David Lechner
2018-01-04 12:28     ` Sekhar Nori [this message]
2018-01-04 17:46       ` David Lechner
2018-01-04 12:43   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-01-04 17:47     ` David Lechner
2017-12-31 23:39 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: davinci: convert to common clock framework David Lechner
2018-01-04 12:39   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-01-04 17:50     ` David Lechner
2018-01-04 19:26       ` Adam Ford
2018-01-04 21:22         ` David Lechner
2018-01-05  2:59       ` David Lechner
2018-01-05 10:42         ` Sekhar Nori
2018-01-06  1:42           ` David Lechner
2018-01-08  5:36             ` Sekhar Nori
2017-12-31 23:39 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] ARM: davinci_all_defconfig: remove CONFIG_DAVINCI_RESET_CLOCKS David Lechner
2018-01-02 15:10 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] ARM: davinci: convert to common clock framework​ Adam Ford
2018-01-02 17:10   ` David Lechner
2018-01-02 18:31     ` David Lechner
2018-01-03 16:57   ` Sekhar Nori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=521d77e1-1375-7ef0-4ef5-d8a3401d1b73@ti.com \
    --to=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=aford173@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@lechnology.com \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®