From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/12] cpuset: make cs->{cpus,mems}_allowed as user-configured masks
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:51:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5257CA16.2060008@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5257C9A1.1030404@huawei.com>
Now we've used effective cpumasks to enforce hierarchical manner,
we can use cs->{cpus,mems}_allowed as configured masks.
Configured masks can be changed by writing cpuset.cpus and cpuset.mems
only. The new behaviors are:
- They won't be changed by hotplug anymore.
- They won't be limited by its parent's masks.
This ia a behavior change, but won't take effect unless mount with
sane_behavior.
v2:
- Add comments to explain the differences between configured masks and
effective masks.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
kernel/cpuset.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 040ec59..e47115e 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -82,6 +82,26 @@ struct cpuset {
unsigned long flags; /* "unsigned long" so bitops work */
+ /*
+ * If sane_behavior is set:
+ *
+ * The user-configured masks can only be changed by writing to
+ * cpuset.cpus and cpuset.mems, and won't be limited by the
+ * parent masks.
+ *
+ * The effective masks is the real masks that apply to the tasks
+ * in the cpuset. They may be changed if the configured masks are
+ * changed or hotplug happens.
+ *
+ * effective_mask == configured_mask & parent's effective_mask,
+ * and if it ends up empty, it will inherit the parent's mask.
+ *
+ *
+ * If sane_behavior is not set:
+ *
+ * The user-configured masks are always the same with effective masks.
+ */
+
/* user-configured CPUs and Memory Nodes allow to tasks */
cpumask_var_t cpus_allowed;
nodemask_t mems_allowed;
@@ -455,9 +475,13 @@ static int validate_change(struct cpuset *cur, struct cpuset *trial)
par = parent_cs(cur);
- /* We must be a subset of our parent cpuset */
+ /*
+ * We must be a subset of our parent cpuset, unless sane_behavior
+ * flag is set.
+ */
ret = -EACCES;
- if (!is_cpuset_subset(trial, par))
+ if (!cgroup_sane_behavior(cur->css.cgroup) &&
+ !is_cpuset_subset(trial, par))
goto out;
/*
@@ -779,7 +803,7 @@ static void rebuild_sched_domains_locked(void)
* passing doms with offlined cpu to partition_sched_domains().
* Anyways, hotplug work item will rebuild sched domains.
*/
- if (!cpumask_equal(top_cpuset.cpus_allowed, cpu_active_mask))
+ if (!cpumask_equal(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask))
goto out;
/* Generate domain masks and attrs */
@@ -2191,11 +2215,12 @@ retry:
goto retry;
}
- cpumask_andnot(&off_cpus, cs->cpus_allowed, top_cpuset.cpus_allowed);
- nodes_andnot(off_mems, cs->mems_allowed, top_cpuset.mems_allowed);
+ cpumask_andnot(&off_cpus, cs->effective_cpus, top_cpuset.effective_cpus);
+ nodes_andnot(off_mems, cs->effective_mems, top_cpuset.effective_mems);
mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
- cpumask_andnot(cs->cpus_allowed, cs->cpus_allowed, &off_cpus);
+ if (!sane)
+ cpumask_andnot(cs->cpus_allowed, cs->cpus_allowed, &off_cpus);
/* Inherit the effective mask of the parent, if it becomes empty. */
cpumask_andnot(cs->effective_cpus, cs->effective_cpus, &off_cpus);
@@ -2214,7 +2239,8 @@ retry:
update_tasks_cpumask(cs, NULL);
mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
- nodes_andnot(cs->mems_allowed, cs->mems_allowed, off_mems);
+ if (!sane)
+ nodes_andnot(cs->mems_allowed, cs->mems_allowed, off_mems);
/* Inherit the effective mask of the parent, if it becomes empty */
nodes_andnot(cs->effective_mems, cs->effective_mems, off_mems);
@@ -2269,6 +2295,7 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
static cpumask_t new_cpus;
static nodemask_t new_mems;
bool cpus_updated, mems_updated;
+ bool sane = cgroup_sane_behavior(top_cpuset.css.cgroup);
mutex_lock(&cpuset_mutex);
@@ -2276,13 +2303,14 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
cpumask_copy(&new_cpus, cpu_active_mask);
new_mems = node_states[N_MEMORY];
- cpus_updated = !cpumask_equal(top_cpuset.cpus_allowed, &new_cpus);
- mems_updated = !nodes_equal(top_cpuset.mems_allowed, new_mems);
+ cpus_updated = !cpumask_equal(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, &new_cpus);
+ mems_updated = !nodes_equal(top_cpuset.effective_mems, new_mems);
/* synchronize cpus_allowed to cpu_active_mask */
if (cpus_updated) {
mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
- cpumask_copy(top_cpuset.cpus_allowed, &new_cpus);
+ if (!sane)
+ cpumask_copy(top_cpuset.cpus_allowed, &new_cpus);
cpumask_copy(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, &new_cpus);
mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
/* we don't mess with cpumasks of tasks in top_cpuset */
@@ -2291,7 +2319,8 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
/* synchronize mems_allowed to N_MEMORY */
if (mems_updated) {
mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
- top_cpuset.mems_allowed = new_mems;
+ if (!sane)
+ top_cpuset.mems_allowed = new_mems;
top_cpuset.effective_mems = new_mems;
mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
update_tasks_nodemask(&top_cpuset, NULL);
--
1.8.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-11 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-11 9:49 [PATCH v2 00/12] cpuset: separate configured masks and effective masks Li Zefan
2013-10-11 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] cpuset: add cs->effective_cpus and cs->effective_mems Li Zefan
2013-10-11 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] cpuset: update cpuset->effective_{cpus,mems} at hotplug Li Zefan
2013-10-11 9:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] cpuset: update cs->effective_{cpus,mems} when config changes Li Zefan
2013-10-15 15:18 ` Tejun Heo
2013-10-11 9:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] cpuset: inherit ancestor's masks if effective_{cpus,mems} becomes empty Li Zefan
2013-10-11 9:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] cpuset: use effective cpumask to build sched domains Li Zefan
2013-10-15 15:25 ` Tejun Heo
2013-10-11 9:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] cpuset: initialize top_cpuset's configured masks at mount Li Zefan
2013-10-11 9:51 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] cpuset: apply cs->effective_{cpus,mems} Li Zefan
2013-10-11 9:51 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2013-10-11 9:51 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] cpuset: refactor cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks() Li Zefan
2013-10-11 9:51 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] cpuset: enable onlined cpu/node in effective masks Li Zefan
2013-10-11 9:51 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] cpuset: allow writing offlined masks to cpuset.cpus/mems Li Zefan
2013-10-15 15:36 ` Tejun Heo
2013-10-11 9:52 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] cpuset: export effective masks to userspace Li Zefan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5257CA16.2060008@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome