mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in 4.8 - CPU speed set very low
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 21:22:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5271ed6f-5798-e930-d7fd-17fe6bb7ea96@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0j3fJ7pDoR+LhY6x1T0yQEhq6omFL7-BrBcMy68eFiMMg@mail.gmail.com>

On 09/27/2016 06:46 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Larry Finger
> <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> wrote:
>> On 09/26/2016 10:12 PM, Doug Smythies wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2016.09.26 18:31 Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 19:48 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/26/2016 07:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Larry Finger wrote:
>>>>>> But for both we need a reproducer anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not have a reliable reproducer. The condition has always
>>>>> happened when
>>>>> running a high-compute job such as a 'make -j8' on the kernel, or
>>>>> building the
>>>>> RPM for openSUSE's implementation of VirtualBox. The latter is what
>>>>> I'm using
>>>>> for most of my testing.
>>>
>>>
>>> Run some CPU stressor and get all your CPU's going at 100% load.
>>> And watch your core temperatures while you do so.
>>
>>
>> for i in 1 2 3 4; do while : ; do : ; done & done
>>
>> triggered the fault in a few minutes.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> It also would be good to rule out the thermal throttling (as per
>>>>>> the Srinivas' comments).
>>>
>>>
>>> It is almost certainly thermal throttling, or similar causing
>>> Clock modulation, of it seems 50%.
>>
>>
>> While the infinite loops were running, the temps were:
>>
>> finger@linux-1t8h:~/rtlwifi_new> sensors
>> coretemp-isa-0000
>> Adapter: ISA adapter
>> Physical id 0:  +83.0°C  (high = +84.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 0:         +83.0°C  (high = +84.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 1:         +74.0°C  (high = +84.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>
> It looks like the trip point (high) temperature was exceeded causing
> thermal throttling to kick in.
>
>> After the fault occurs, I get
>>
>> finger@linux-1t8h:~/rtlwifi_new> sensors
>> coretemp-isa-0000
>> Adapter: ISA adapter
>> Physical id 0:  +44.0°C  (high = +84.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 0:         +43.0°C  (high = +84.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 1:         +41.0°C  (high = +84.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>
> So after that it stays at 400 MHz forever, right?
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For now, please tell me what's in
>>>>>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_min_freq
>>>>>
>>>>> 800000
>>>>
>>>> Your effective freq is lower than 800MHz. One of the possible reason is
>>>> thermal throttling.
>>>>
>>>> What distro you are using?
>>>
>>>
>>> And what make and model of LapTop?
>>
>>
>> Toshiba Tecra A50-A with CPU Model: 6.60.3 "Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4600M CPU @
>> 2.90GHz. That is a dual-core unit with hyperthreading.
>>
>> @Rafael: As I write this, the system has been running the infinite loop test
>> for almost 5 hours with kernel 4.7. I will leave that running while I'm
>> gone, but I am certain that it is OK.
>
> OK, and what temperatures do you see while doing this?

finger@linux-1t8h:~/linux-2.6> sensors
coretemp-isa-0000
Adapter: ISA adapter
Physical id 0:  +90.0°C  (high = +84.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 0:         +90.0°C  (high = +84.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
Core 1:         +78.0°C  (high = +84.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)

Once again, the CPU temp is greater than the "high" value; however, the clock 
rate continues to hold near 3600 MHz.

My laptop was inadvertently put to sleep while I was gone. I forgot to leave a 
note for my wife and she quieted the noisy cpu fan. :)

Larry

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-29  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-09 17:39 Larry Finger
2016-09-14 16:00 ` Larry Finger
2016-09-19  2:54   ` Larry Finger
2016-09-24  2:45     ` Larry Finger
2016-09-26 11:37       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-26 16:15         ` Larry Finger
2016-09-26 21:06           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-26 21:26             ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-09-26 21:30               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-26 21:41                 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-09-26 21:46                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-26 21:28             ` Larry Finger
2016-09-26 21:37               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-26 21:46                 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-09-26 22:15                   ` Larry Finger
2016-09-26 22:09                 ` Larry Finger
2016-09-26 22:16                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-26 23:53                     ` Larry Finger
2016-09-27  0:21                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-27  0:48                         ` Larry Finger
2016-09-27  1:30                           ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-09-27  2:53                             ` Larry Finger
2016-09-27  3:12                           ` Doug Smythies
2016-09-27  8:48                             ` Larry Finger
2016-09-27 11:46                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-29  2:22                                 ` Larry Finger [this message]
2016-09-29 12:19                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-29 15:09                                     ` Larry Finger
2016-09-29 15:56                                     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-09-29 16:24                                       ` Larry Finger
2016-09-29 20:52                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-09-30 21:52                                       ` Larry Finger
2016-09-27 14:51               ` Lennart Sorensen
2016-09-29  2:26                 ` Larry Finger
2016-09-29 14:17                   ` Lennart Sorensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5271ed6f-5798-e930-d7fd-17fe6bb7ea96@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®