mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
To: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"vincent.guittot@linaro.org" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"daniel.lezcano@linaro.org" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	"fweisbec@gmail.com" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"fenghua.yu@intel.com" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"arjan@linux.intel.com" <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	"pjt@google.com" <pjt@google.com>,
	"fengguang.wu@intel.com" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	"james.hogan@imgtec.com" <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
	"jason.low2@hp.com" <jason.low2@hp.com>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"hanjun.guo@linaro.org" <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched: bias to target cpu load to reduce task moving
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 22:45:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52B457EF.9060204@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131220111926.GA11605@e103034-lin>

On 12/20/2013 07:19 PM, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> @@ -4132,10 +4137,10 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu)
>> >  
>> >  		for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_cpus(group)) {
>> >  			/* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */
>> > -			if (local_group)
>> > +			if (i == this_cpu)
> What is the motivation for changing the local_group load calculation?
> Now the load contributions of all cpus in the local group, except
> this_cpu, will contribute more as their contribution (this_load) is
> determined using target_load() instead.
> 
> If I'm not mistaken, that will lead to more frequent load balancing as
> the local_group bias has been reduced. That is the opposite of your
> intentions based on your comment in target_load().

Good catch. will reconsider this again. :)
> 
>> >  				load = source_load(i);
>> >  			else
>> > -				load = target_load(i);
>> > +				load = target_load(i, sd->imbalance_pct);
> You scale by sd->imbalance_pct instead of 100+(sd->imbalance_pct-100)/2
> that you removed above. sd->imbalance_pct may have been arbitrarily
> chosen in the past, but changing it may affect behavior. 
> 


-- 
Thanks
    Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-20 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-03  9:05 [PATCH 0/4] sched: remove cpu_load decay Alex Shi
2013-12-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: shortcut to remove load_idx Alex Shi
2013-12-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: remove rq->cpu_load[load_idx] array Alex Shi
2013-12-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched: clean up cpu_load update Alex Shi
2013-12-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched: bias to target cpu load to reduce task moving Alex Shi
2013-12-04  9:06   ` Yuanhan Liu
2013-12-04 11:25     ` Alex Shi
2013-12-17 14:10   ` Morten Rasmussen
2013-12-17 15:38     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-19 13:34       ` Alex Shi
2013-12-20 11:19         ` Morten Rasmussen
2013-12-20 14:45           ` Alex Shi [this message]
2013-12-25 14:58           ` Alex Shi
2014-01-02 16:04             ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-01-06 13:35               ` Alex Shi
2014-01-07 12:55                 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-01-07 12:59                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-07 13:15                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-07 13:32                       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-01-07 13:40                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-07 15:16                       ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-01-07 20:37                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-08 14:15                     ` Alex Shi
2013-12-03 10:26 ` [PATCH 0/4] sched: remove cpu_load decay Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-10  1:04   ` Alex Shi
2013-12-10  1:06     ` Paul Turner
2013-12-13 19:50     ` bsegall
2013-12-14 12:53       ` Alex Shi
2013-12-13 20:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-14 13:27   ` Alex Shi
2013-12-17 14:04     ` Morten Rasmussen
2013-12-17 15:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 18:12         ` Morten Rasmussen
2013-12-20 14:43           ` Alex Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52B457EF.9060204@linaro.org \
    --to=alex.shi@linaro.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome