From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Li, ZhenHua" <zhen-hual@hp.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/iommu: use bit structures for context_entry
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:32:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CFA22A.9060609@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52CFA140.5060700@hp.com>
I have noticed the same issue too. But after second check, seems
it's safe with current implementation, but obviously it's not
future safe.
On 2014/1/10 15:29, Li, ZhenHua wrote:
> I have not seen such a bug yet . but obviously a '=' should be used when
> you want to set a value.
>
> for example, if x != 0,
> x=10
> and
> x|=10
> will cause different result.
>
> ZhenHua
>
> On 01/07/2014 10:41 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 04:45:01PM +0800, Li, Zhen-Hua wrote:
>>> There is a structure named context_entry used by intel iommu, and there
>>> are some bit operations on it. Use bit structure may make these
>>> operations
>>> easy.
>>> Also the function context_set_address_root may cause problem because
>>> it uses
>>> |= operation, not set the new value. And this patch can fix it.
>>
>> What is the problem you are trying to fix here? Is it an actual bug?
>>
>>
>> Joerg
>>
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-10 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-20 8:45 Li, Zhen-Hua
[not found] ` <CAOtp4KqUgSnwadP0T=aWYX7rRzDBn3qkuqMzceDBO0c_bhpFwQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <E959C4978C3B6342920538CF579893F001D3C26D@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2014-01-06 1:41 ` Li, ZhenHua
2014-01-07 14:41 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-01-10 7:29 ` Li, ZhenHua
2014-01-10 7:32 ` Jiang Liu [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-10 8:27 Li, Zhen-Hua
2014-01-10 8:31 ` Li, ZhenHua
2013-05-24 0:22 Li, Zhen-Hua
2013-05-24 0:36 ` Joe Perches
2013-05-24 0:43 ` ZhenHua
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CFA22A.9060609@linux.intel.com \
--to=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhen-hual@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome