mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krishna Kurapati <krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
Cc: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: dwc3: core: Fix RAM interface getting stuck during enumeration
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 19:41:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52f002c4-9462-479a-b915-149373d6ac46@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <auksxKbHVZzUd4G5@vbox>



On 11/3/2026 8:41 AM, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry for the delay, I was out of office.
> 
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2026, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
>>
>> On 10/21/2026 7:31 AM, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd rather not take this without testing. The check adds a register read
>>> to every endpoint command and implies that CSR timeout is expected
>>> during command sending, which it shouldn't be. Without confirmation that
>>> it catches the issue and that recovery works, that cost is not
>>> justified.
>>>
>>
>> I won't be able to test this in my environment. The only PIPO test that
>> easily reproduced it easily was with one faulty cable from (IIRC Xiaomi) and
>> CDP port of AMD based Lenovo laptop (there was a particular variant, I will
>> find out). I don't have that faulty cable for now, but this issue was
>> reported even on Kaanapali as well on 6.12 Kernel (mobile build). Not sure
>> if I can provide this series along with err_recovery_work to OEM and get the
>> results since this is reproducible with very difficulty on their end too.
>>
>> How about we add the Depcmd check and then the GSTS check inside it ? To
>> avoid checking GSTS always.
> 
> Your report shows ENDXFER timing out with CMDACT still set, so the
> DEPCMD read back may not show a mismatch, and GSTS would never be
> checked. To avoid reading GSTS on every command, we could check it
> only when the command times out instead.
> 
> I'm fine with this approach. Since it's hard to reproduce, please note
> in the commit message that it's untested against the failure, and add
> a dev_err when it triggers so we can confirm it when it does happen.
> 
>>
>>> Also, looking at the original report again, the stuck state could start
>>> without an endpoint command being issued. Unplugging the cable then gave
>>> no disconnect event, which blocked suspend. A check only in
>>> dwc3_send_gadget_ep_cmd() wouldn't catch that.
>>>
>>
>> Currently on downstream, the way we work is that if we unplug the cable we
>> expect the controller enter runtime suspend. If that doesn't happen and the
>> controller is stuck, we do a "usb_gadget_disconnect(dwc->gadget)" and then
>> upon re-connect we do a "usb_gadget_connect(dwc->gadget)". So, if upon any
>> plug-in, if enumeration fails and if we encounter this scenario, we are not
>> handling this until plug out is done.
>>
> 
> How do you detect that it's stuck? Soft-connect already does a core soft
> reset, so you could call usb_gadget_connect() right away instead of
> waiting for re-connect.
> 
> Would be great if you have logs showing a consistent symptom (GSTS,
> DSTS, DEPCMD read back) that we can check for.

Will dig up my mails. I remember having logged the registers when 
discussing this issue with synopsys.

Regards,
Krishna,

> 
> BR,
> Thinh


      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-04 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20260929051941epcas5p27a5c69151937b9105660941776cda819@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2026-09-29  5:19 ` Krishna Kurapati
2026-09-29  6:45   ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2026-09-29  8:35     ` Krishna Kurapati
2026-09-29 11:02       ` Selvarasu Ganesan
2026-09-29 17:50         ` Krishna Kurapati
2026-10-13  8:40   ` Krishna Kurapati
2026-10-14  1:44     ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-10-14 10:58       ` Krishna Kurapati
2026-10-15  2:12         ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-10-15  3:18           ` Krishna Kurapati
2026-10-21  2:01             ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-10-28 17:17               ` Krishna Kurapati
2026-11-03  3:11                 ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-11-04 14:11                   ` Krishna Kurapati [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52f002c4-9462-479a-b915-149373d6ac46@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®