From: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: Muli Ben-Yehuda <mulix@mulix.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>, Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc64-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: More convenient way to grab hugepage memory
Date: 12 May 2004 23:45:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52wu3g9656.fsf@topspin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040513062014.GJ27403@zax>
David> Well, it's only called in one place - it's really the one
David> function, just split up to let us put the wrapper creating
David> the hugetlb file in the right place without excessive
David> indentation. I guess it doesn't really matter, with
David> -funit-at-a-time it will end up the same anyway.
We seem to be in a strange situation with respect to -funit-at-a-time:
arch/i386/Makefile:
# Disable unit-at-a-time mode, it makes gcc use a lot more stack
# due to the lack of sharing of stacklots.
CFLAGS += $(call check_gcc,-fno-unit-at-a-time,)
arch/x86_64/Makefile:
# -funit-at-a-time shrinks the kernel .text considerably
# unfortunately it makes reading oopses harder.
CFLAGS += $(call check_gcc,-funit-at-a-time,)
arch/ppc64/Makefile:
# Enable unit-at-a-time mode when possible. It shrinks the
# kernel considerably.
CFLAGS += $(call check_gcc,-funit-at-a-time,)
It looks like i386/x86_64 led the way to -funit-at-a-time, ppc64
followed, and then i386 had second thoughts because of increased stack
usage around the time of 4K stacks.
No other archs have a position one way or another.
- Roland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-13 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-13 5:55 David Gibson
2004-05-13 6:05 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2004-05-13 6:20 ` David Gibson
2004-05-13 6:45 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2004-05-13 6:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-13 7:04 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-13 7:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-13 7:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-13 7:13 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-13 8:05 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2004-05-13 6:06 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-13 6:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-13 7:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-05-13 8:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52wu3g9656.fsf@topspin.com \
--to=roland@topspin.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=mulix@mulix.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®