From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
Martin.Runge@rohde-schwarz.com, Andreas.Brief@rohde-schwarz.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Mark __vdso entries as asmlinkage
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:06:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530EC7D1.3000706@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140227033920.GI12219@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
On 02/26/2014 07:39 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 05:02:13PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> This makes no difference for 64-bit, bit it's critical for 32-bit code:
>> these functions are called from outside the kernel, so they need to comply
>> with the ABI.
>
> That's an odd patch. If that was wrong things couldn't have worked at all.
> Probably hidden by inlining? If yes just make it static
>
> Also you would rather need notrace more often.
>
It has to support *an* ABI... the syscall vdso entry point uses the old
int $0x80 calling convention rather than the normal ABI. It would
depend on the test program and eventual glibc implementation. And sure
enough, the test program has:
int (*vdso_gettimeofday)(struct timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz)
__attribute__ ((regparm (3)));
int (*vdso_clock_gettime)(clockid_t clk_id, struct timespec *tp)
__attribute__ ((regparm (3)));
time_t (*vdso_time)(time_t *t) __attribute__ ((regparm (3)));
That being said, since this code is compiled separately, the compiler
flags there determine what actually matters. However, there we have:
KBUILD_CFLAGS_32 += -m32 -msoft-float -mregparm=3 -freg-struct-return -fpic
The normal ABI almost certainly makes more sense; as such -mregparm=3 is
probably not what we want, and I suspect it makes more sense to just
drop that from the CFLAGS line?
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-27 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-26 19:34 Final: Add 32 bit VDSO time function support Stefani Seibold
2014-02-26 20:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-26 20:45 ` Greg KH
2014-02-26 20:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-27 0:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-27 1:02 ` [PATCH 0/2] Improvements/fixes to 32-bit vdso timing Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-27 1:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Mark __vdso entries as asmlinkage Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-27 3:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-27 3:39 ` Andi Kleen
2014-02-27 5:06 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2014-02-27 5:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-27 5:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-27 20:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-27 23:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-27 5:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-27 1:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Inline the CLOCK_MONOTONIC vdso code Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-28 0:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] vDSO fixes, on top of tip/x86/vdso Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-28 0:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] x86: Use the default ABI for the 32-bit vDSO Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-28 7:28 ` Stefani Seibold
2014-02-28 15:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-28 20:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-01 13:43 ` Stefani Seibold
2014-02-28 0:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] x86: Inline the CLOCK_MONOTONIC vdso code Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-28 0:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] x86: Patch alternatives in the 32-bit vDSO Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-28 7:22 ` Stefani Seibold
2014-03-01 14:04 ` Stefani Seibold
2014-02-28 0:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] x86: Zero-pad the VVAR page Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-28 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] vDSO fixes, on top of tip/x86/vdso Stefani Seibold
2014-02-28 20:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-01 14:02 ` Stefani Seibold
2014-02-28 7:22 ` Final: Add 32 bit VDSO time function support Stefani Seibold
2014-03-01 2:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-01 22:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-02 8:01 ` Stefani Seibold
2014-02-27 5:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-27 12:14 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530EC7D1.3000706@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=Andreas.Brief@rohde-schwarz.com \
--cc=Martin.Runge@rohde-schwarz.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stefani@seibold.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome