* [PATCH] afs: use a consistent interpretation of time values
@ 2018-06-20 7:46 Arnd Bergmann
2018-06-20 10:53 ` David Howells
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2018-06-20 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Howells
Cc: y2038, Arnd Bergmann, Anna Schumaker, linux-afs, linux-kernel
afs uses 32-bit timestamps everywhere, but mixes signed and unsigned
usage, which is a bit inconsistent. In particular on 32-bit machines,
it currently uses unsigned timestamps (ranging from 1970 to 2106) for
locally modified files, but signed timestamps (rand 1902 to 2038) when
reading from a remote end. On 64-bit machines, we always interpret
timestamps as unsigned here.
This replaces the deprecated time_t and get_seconds() interfaces with the
modern time64_t and current_time() to locally store 64-bit timestamps,
taking care to use unsigned interpretation of the raw values everywhere,
which avoids the y2038 overflow and is consistent with the previous
usage on 64-bit machines.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
fs/afs/afs.h | 6 +++---
fs/afs/inode.c | 4 +---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/afs/afs.h b/fs/afs/afs.h
index b4ff1f7ae4ab..6ca50c293553 100644
--- a/fs/afs/afs.h
+++ b/fs/afs/afs.h
@@ -129,8 +129,8 @@ typedef u32 afs_access_t;
struct afs_file_status {
u64 size; /* file size */
afs_dataversion_t data_version; /* current data version */
- time_t mtime_client; /* last time client changed data */
- time_t mtime_server; /* last time server changed data */
+ time64_t mtime_client; /* last time client changed data */
+ time64_t mtime_server; /* last time server changed data */
unsigned abort_code; /* Abort if bulk-fetching this failed */
afs_file_type_t type; /* file type */
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ struct afs_file_status {
* AFS volume synchronisation information
*/
struct afs_volsync {
- time_t creation; /* volume creation time */
+ time64_t creation; /* volume creation time */
};
/*
diff --git a/fs/afs/inode.c b/fs/afs/inode.c
index 479b7fdda124..0507e52e3330 100644
--- a/fs/afs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/afs/inode.c
@@ -213,9 +213,7 @@ struct inode *afs_iget_pseudo_dir(struct super_block *sb, bool root)
set_nlink(inode, 2);
inode->i_uid = GLOBAL_ROOT_UID;
inode->i_gid = GLOBAL_ROOT_GID;
- inode->i_ctime.tv_sec = get_seconds();
- inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec = 0;
- inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime;
+ inode->i_ctime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = current_time(inode);
inode->i_blocks = 0;
inode_set_iversion_raw(inode, 0);
inode->i_generation = 0;
--
2.9.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] afs: use a consistent interpretation of time values
2018-06-20 7:46 [PATCH] afs: use a consistent interpretation of time values Arnd Bergmann
@ 2018-06-20 10:53 ` David Howells
2018-06-20 12:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2018-06-20 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: dhowells, y2038, Anna Schumaker, linux-afs, linux-kernel
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> which avoids the y2038 overflow
No it doesn't. The AFS protocol is limited.
> + time64_t mtime_client; /* last time client changed data */
> + time64_t mtime_server; /* last time server changed data */
> ...
> - time_t creation; /* volume creation time */
> + time64_t creation; /* volume creation time */
Unless you can change the AFS protocol, this is a waste of memory. It might
be better to change them to u32 as they are protocol values rather than system
values.
> - inode->i_ctime.tv_sec = get_seconds();
> - inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec = 0;
> - inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime;
> + inode->i_ctime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = current_time(inode);
Surely, the tv_nsec should be zero since anything else cannot be represented
in the AFS protocol.
I will grant, however, I should be consistently using them as unsigned values.
Note that the answers to the above may change if and when I start supporting
the YFS protocol extensions, but for the AFS protocol, this is simply not
there.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] afs: use a consistent interpretation of time values
2018-06-20 10:53 ` David Howells
@ 2018-06-20 12:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2018-06-20 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Howells
Cc: y2038 Mailman List, Anna Schumaker, linux-afs, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:53 PM, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
>> which avoids the y2038 overflow
>
> No it doesn't. The AFS protocol is limited.
>
>> + time64_t mtime_client; /* last time client changed data */
>> + time64_t mtime_server; /* last time server changed data */
>> ...
>> - time_t creation; /* volume creation time */
>> + time64_t creation; /* volume creation time */
>
> Unless you can change the AFS protocol, this is a waste of memory. It might
> be better to change them to u32 as they are protocol values rather than system
> values.
AFS uses 'unsigned' seconds, right? What I was trying to say there is
that with the patch, the 32-bit overflow gets moved from 2038 to 2106, so at
least the nearer problem is solved.
On 64-bit machines, we already waste a little memory here, the usual
tradeoff I took was to use time64_t for all time storage when possible for
clarity reasons, but that is easily changed if you prefer.
>> - inode->i_ctime.tv_sec = get_seconds();
>> - inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec = 0;
>> - inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime;
>> + inode->i_ctime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = current_time(inode);
>
> Surely, the tv_nsec should be zero since anything else cannot be represented
> in the AFS protocol.
current_time() truncates the nanoseconds to the granularity of the filesystem.
Since AFS doesn't set s_time_gran, it gets the default 1000000000 value
leads to tv_nsec being zero. Once Deepa's patch to truncate the tv_sec
range lands, it will also ensure that this is within the range (this is less
of a problem for setting the current time than it is for utimensat() which
can set arbitrary future timestamps of course).
> I will grant, however, I should be consistently using them as unsigned values.
>
> Note that the answers to the above may change if and when I start supporting
> the YFS protocol extensions, but for the AFS protocol, this is simply not
> there.
Ok, good to know this exists.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-06-20 12:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-06-20 7:46 [PATCH] afs: use a consistent interpretation of time values Arnd Bergmann
2018-06-20 10:53 ` David Howells
2018-06-20 12:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome