From: "Ziqian SUN (Zamir)" <zsun@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"bibo,mao" <bibo.mao@intel.com>,
sztsian@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] kretprobe: Prevent triggering kretprobe from within kprobe_flush_task
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 09:31:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5334d3b4-4020-6705-9bcc-e6777070c9c7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200409201336.GH3309111@krava>
On 4/10/20 4:13 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 08:45:01PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:41:01PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>
>> SNIP
>>
>>>> ---
>>>> kernel/kprobes.c | 6 ++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
>>>> index 2625c241ac00..b13247cae752 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
>>>> @@ -1236,6 +1236,10 @@ __releases(hlist_lock)
>>>> }
>>>> NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kretprobe_table_unlock);
>>>>
>>>> +static struct kprobe kretprobe_dummy = {
>>>> + .addr = (void *)kretprobe_trampoline,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> /*
>>>> * This function is called from finish_task_switch when task tk becomes dead,
>>>> * so that we can recycle any function-return probe instances associated
>>>> @@ -1256,12 +1260,14 @@ void kprobe_flush_task(struct task_struct *tk)
>>>> INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&empty_rp);
>>>> hash = hash_ptr(tk, KPROBE_HASH_BITS);
>>>> head = &kretprobe_inst_table[hash];
>>>> + __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, &kretprobe_dummy);
>>>
>>> Can you also set the kcb->kprobe_state = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE?
>>>
>>> BTW, we may be better to introduce a common kprobe_reject_section_start()
>>> and kprobe_reject_section_end() so that the user don't need to prepare
>>> dummy kprobes.
>>
>> sure, will do
>>
>> thank you both for review
>
> ok, found out it's actually arch code.. would you guys be ok with something like below?
>
> jirka
>
Hi Jiri,
In my origin test lockup happens on both x86_64 and ppc64le. So I would
appreciate if you can also come up with a solution for both of the
architectures.
>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> index 4d7022a740ab..081d0f366c99 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> @@ -757,12 +757,33 @@ static struct kprobe kretprobe_kprobe = {
> .addr = (void *)kretprobe_trampoline,
> };
>
> +void arch_kprobe_reject_section_start(void)
> +{
> + struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb;
> +
> + preempt_disable();
> +
> + /*
> + * Set a dummy kprobe for avoiding kretprobe recursion.
> + * Since kretprobe never run in kprobe handler, kprobe must not
> + * be running behind this point.
> + */
> + __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, &kretprobe_kprobe);
> + kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> + kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
> +}
> +
> +void arch_kprobe_reject_section_end(void)
> +{
> + __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, NULL);
> + preempt_enable();
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Called from kretprobe_trampoline
> */
> __used __visible void *trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb;
> struct kretprobe_instance *ri = NULL;
> struct hlist_head *head, empty_rp;
> struct hlist_node *tmp;
> @@ -772,16 +793,7 @@ __used __visible void *trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> void *frame_pointer;
> bool skipped = false;
>
> - preempt_disable();
> -
> - /*
> - * Set a dummy kprobe for avoiding kretprobe recursion.
> - * Since kretprobe never run in kprobe handler, kprobe must not
> - * be running at this point.
> - */
> - kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> - __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, &kretprobe_kprobe);
> - kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
> + arch_kprobe_reject_section_start();
>
> INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&empty_rp);
> kretprobe_hash_lock(current, &head, &flags);
> @@ -873,8 +885,7 @@ __used __visible void *trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> kretprobe_hash_unlock(current, &flags);
>
> - __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, NULL);
> - preempt_enable();
> + arch_kprobe_reject_section_end();
>
> hlist_for_each_entry_safe(ri, tmp, &empty_rp, hlist) {
> hlist_del(&ri->hlist);
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 2625c241ac00..935dd8c87705 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -1236,6 +1236,14 @@ __releases(hlist_lock)
> }
> NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kretprobe_table_unlock);
>
> +void __weak arch_kprobe_reject_section_start(void)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void __weak arch_kprobe_reject_section_end(void)
> +{
> +}
> +
> /*
> * This function is called from finish_task_switch when task tk becomes dead,
> * so that we can recycle any function-return probe instances associated
> @@ -1253,6 +1261,8 @@ void kprobe_flush_task(struct task_struct *tk)
> /* Early boot. kretprobe_table_locks not yet initialized. */
> return;
>
> + arch_kprobe_reject_section_start();
> +
> INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&empty_rp);
> hash = hash_ptr(tk, KPROBE_HASH_BITS);
> head = &kretprobe_inst_table[hash];
> @@ -1266,6 +1276,8 @@ void kprobe_flush_task(struct task_struct *tk)
> hlist_del(&ri->hlist);
> kfree(ri);
> }
> +
> + arch_kprobe_reject_section_end();
> }
> NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_flush_task);
>
>
--
Ziqian SUN (Zamir)
9F Raycom office (NAY)
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd
IRC: zsun (internal and freenode)
Tel: +86 10 65627458
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-10 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-08 16:46 Jiri Olsa
2020-04-09 9:02 ` Naveen N. Rao
2020-04-09 18:43 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-04-09 12:38 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-04-09 12:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-04-09 14:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-04-09 13:16 ` Naveen N. Rao
2020-04-09 14:26 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-04-09 14:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-04-09 18:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-04-09 20:13 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-04-10 0:31 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-04-14 16:03 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-04-15 9:05 ` [PATCH] " Jiri Olsa
2020-04-16 1:55 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-04-16 9:13 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-04-16 13:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-04-16 14:31 ` [PATCHv2] " Jiri Olsa
2020-04-17 7:38 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-04-28 21:36 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-01 2:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-05-07 10:15 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-04-10 1:31 ` Ziqian SUN (Zamir) [this message]
2020-04-14 16:03 ` [RFC] " Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5334d3b4-4020-6705-9bcc-e6777070c9c7@redhat.com \
--to=zsun@redhat.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=bibo.mao@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sztsian@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®