From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Emanuele Ghidoli <ghidoliemanuele@gmail.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Emanuele Ghidoli <emanuele.ghidoli@toradex.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] net: phy: dp83867: Disable EEE support as not implemented
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:41:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <539795a1-2a69-4fcb-88e7-ca4e3b13ad7c@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251027143522.GA57409@francesco-nb>
> I was talking together with Emanuele on this topic and we are confused
> on how to proceed.
>
> >From the various comments and tests in this thread, to me the actual
> code change is correct, the dp83867 does not support EEE and we have to
> explicitly disable it in the dp83867 driver.
>
> As of now we do not have a clear shared understanding on what is going
> on in the stmmac driver. And the commit message is not correct on this
> regard.
>
> This patch is already merged [1] in netdev tree, should we send a series
> reverting this commit and another commit with just the same change and a
> different commit message?
No, if its merged, its merged. What should come out of this is a
learning, please be precise with commit messages, more detail rather
than less, and provide as much supporting evidence as you can for any
claims you make.
> In parallel, unrelated to the dp83867 topic, Emanuele is trying to help
> figuring out why the actual behavior of the stmmac changed after Russell
> refactoring. And it's clear that this change in behavior is not expected.
Great.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-27 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-23 14:48 Emanuele Ghidoli
2025-10-23 17:01 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-10-25 2:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2025-10-25 8:44 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-25 9:19 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-10-25 9:37 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-26 23:45 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-10-27 12:57 ` Emanuele Ghidoli
2025-10-27 13:25 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-10-27 13:57 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-10-27 14:35 ` Francesco Dolcini
2025-10-27 14:41 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2025-10-27 14:53 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-27 15:34 ` Emanuele Ghidoli
2025-10-27 16:44 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-27 17:23 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-10-27 19:26 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=539795a1-2a69-4fcb-88e7-ca4e3b13ad7c@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=emanuele.ghidoli@toradex.com \
--cc=francesco@dolcini.it \
--cc=ghidoliemanuele@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®