From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: relative objtree change broke tar builds?
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:13:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A200DD.3060004@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140618195259.GA21939@ravnborg.org>
On 06/18/14 12:52, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:47:28PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>> Dne 18.6.2014 17:58, Randy Dunlap napsal(a):
>>> On 06/18/14 06:14, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:33:22PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>>>>> Dne 18.6.2014 14:20, J. Bruce Fields napsal(a):
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:06:12AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>>>>>>> Dne 18.6.2014 00:38, J. Bruce Fields napsal(a):
>>>>>>>> The changelog there says
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The main Makefile sets its working directory to the object tree
>>>>>>>> and never changes it again. Therefore, we can use '.' instead of
>>>>>>>> the absolute path.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But the main Makefile also exports objtree, and a quick grep suggests
>>>>>>>> lots of other uses outside the main Makefile.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you have examples? Besides your report, I'm only aware of make
>>>>>>> deb-pkg and make *docs. What else?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I haven't looked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I only note that grep finds 47 files referencing that variable, and
>>>>>> absent some argument that the remaining ones are correct, I'd be
>>>>>> inclined to revert.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do these 47 files change the working directory before referencing the
>>>>> variable?
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I'm not volunteering to check.
>>>>
>>>> Note also that other variables are defined in terms of objtree, and they
>>>> may be exported or passed to other scripts.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'll note one side effect that I really dislike:
>>> If not in silent mode, scripts/mkmakefile tells me that the it is
>>> generating ./Makefile. I want to see the real path there instead of '.'.
>>
>> The idea is that one should be able to compare as much as possible
>> between the build of /usr/src/linux-<version_a> built in
>> /usr/src/linux-<version_a>/build and /usr/src/linux-<version_b> built in
>> /usr/src/linux-<version_b>/build. One can now even compare the build log
>> with -j1, although that was not the primary goal. So if the changed
>> message is considered problematic, I can change it to show the full path
>> again, like
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/mkmakefile b/scripts/mkmakefile
>> index 84af27b..9d291f5 100644
>> --- a/scripts/mkmakefile
>> +++ b/scripts/mkmakefile
>> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ then
>> exit 0
>> fi
>> if [ "${quiet}" != "silent_" ]; then
>> - echo " GEN $2/Makefile"
>> + echo " GEN $(cd $2 && /bin/pwd)/Makefile"
>> fi
>>
>> cat << EOF > $2/Makefile
>>
>> Opinions?
> I agree with Randy - the full path is more informative.
>
> Sam
Yes, just '.' discards some very useful information.
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-18 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-17 22:38 J. Bruce Fields
2014-06-18 9:06 ` Michal Marek
2014-06-18 12:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-06-18 12:33 ` Michal Marek
2014-06-18 13:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-06-18 15:58 ` Randy Dunlap
2014-06-18 19:47 ` Michal Marek
2014-06-18 19:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2014-06-18 21:13 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2014-07-04 21:37 ` Michal Marek
2014-07-04 21:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2014-07-07 1:04 ` Randy Dunlap
2014-06-18 21:20 ` Randy Dunlap
2014-06-19 1:21 ` Ken Moffat
2014-07-04 21:42 ` Michal Marek
2014-06-18 14:26 ` [PATCH] kbuild: Fix tar-pkg with relative $(objtree) Michal Marek
2014-06-18 15:29 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-06-18 15:34 ` Michal Marek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53A200DD.3060004@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome