From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 03/12] cpuset: update cs->effective_{cpus,mems} when config changes
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 16:47:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BD01A1.2060302@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53BD0174.4060002@huawei.com>
We're going to have separate user-configured masks and effective ones.
Eventually configured masks can only be changed by writing cpuset.cpus
and cpuset.mems, and they won't be restricted by parent cpuset. While
effective masks reflect cpu/memory hotplug and hierachical restriction,
and these are the real masks that apply to the tasks in the cpuset.
We calculate effective mask this way:
- top cpuset's effective_mask == online_mask, otherwise
- cpuset's effective_mask == configured_mask & parent effective_mask,
if the result is empty, it inherits parent effective mask.
Those behavior changes are for default hierarchy only. For legacy
hierarchy, effective_mask and configured_mask are the same, so we won't
break old interfaces.
To make cs->effective_{cpus,mems} to be effective masks, we need to
- update the effective masks at hotplug
- update the effective masks at config change
- take on ancestor's mask when the effective mask is empty
The second item is done here. We don't need to treat root_cs specially
in update_cpumasks_hier().
This won't introduce behavior change.
v3:
- add a WARN_ON() to check if effective masks are the same with configured
masks on legacy hierarchy.
- pass trialcs->cpus_allowed to update_cpumasks_hier() and add a comment for
it. Similar change for update_nodemasks_hier(). Suggested by Tejun.
v2:
- revise the comment in update_{cpu,node}masks_hier(), suggested by Tejun.
- fix to use @cp instead of @cs in these two functions.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
kernel/cpuset.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 94f651d..da766c3 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -855,36 +855,45 @@ static void update_tasks_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs)
}
/*
- * update_tasks_cpumask_hier - Update the cpumasks of tasks in the hierarchy.
- * @root_cs: the root cpuset of the hierarchy
- * @update_root: update root cpuset or not?
+ * update_cpumasks_hier - Update effective cpumasks and tasks in the subtree
+ * @cs: the cpuset to consider
+ * @new_cpus: temp variable for calculating new effective_cpus
+ *
+ * When congifured cpumask is changed, the effective cpumasks of this cpuset
+ * and all its descendants need to be updated.
*
- * This will update cpumasks of tasks in @root_cs and all other empty cpusets
- * which take on cpumask of @root_cs.
+ * On legacy hierachy, effective_cpus will be the same with cpu_allowed.
*
* Called with cpuset_mutex held
*/
-static void update_tasks_cpumask_hier(struct cpuset *root_cs, bool update_root)
+static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *new_cpus)
{
struct cpuset *cp;
struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos_css;
rcu_read_lock();
- cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre(cp, pos_css, root_cs) {
- if (cp == root_cs) {
- if (!update_root)
- continue;
- } else {
- /* skip the whole subtree if @cp have some CPU */
- if (!cpumask_empty(cp->cpus_allowed)) {
- pos_css = css_rightmost_descendant(pos_css);
- continue;
- }
+ cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre(cp, pos_css, cs) {
+ struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cp);
+
+ cpumask_and(new_cpus, cp->cpus_allowed, parent->effective_cpus);
+
+ /* Skip the whole subtree if the cpumask remains the same. */
+ if (cpumask_equal(new_cpus, cp->effective_cpus)) {
+ pos_css = css_rightmost_descendant(pos_css);
+ continue;
}
+
if (!css_tryget_online(&cp->css))
continue;
rcu_read_unlock();
+ mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+ cpumask_copy(cp->effective_cpus, new_cpus);
+ mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+
+ WARN_ON(!cgroup_on_dfl(cp->css.cgroup) &&
+ !cpumask_equal(cp->cpus_allowed, cp->effective_cpus));
+
update_tasks_cpumask(cp);
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -940,7 +949,8 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
cpumask_copy(cs->cpus_allowed, trialcs->cpus_allowed);
mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
- update_tasks_cpumask_hier(cs, true);
+ /* use trialcs->cpus_allowed as a temp variable */
+ update_cpumasks_hier(cs, trialcs->cpus_allowed);
if (is_load_balanced)
rebuild_sched_domains_locked();
@@ -1091,36 +1101,45 @@ static void update_tasks_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs)
}
/*
- * update_tasks_nodemask_hier - Update the nodemasks of tasks in the hierarchy.
- * @cs: the root cpuset of the hierarchy
- * @update_root: update the root cpuset or not?
+ * update_nodemasks_hier - Update effective nodemasks and tasks in the subtree
+ * @cs: the cpuset to consider
+ * @new_mems: a temp variable for calculating new effective_mems
+ *
+ * When configured nodemask is changed, the effective nodemasks of this cpuset
+ * and all its descendants need to be updated.
*
- * This will update nodemasks of tasks in @root_cs and all other empty cpusets
- * which take on nodemask of @root_cs.
+ * On legacy hiearchy, effective_mems will be the same with mems_allowed.
*
* Called with cpuset_mutex held
*/
-static void update_tasks_nodemask_hier(struct cpuset *root_cs, bool update_root)
+static void update_nodemasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *new_mems)
{
struct cpuset *cp;
struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos_css;
rcu_read_lock();
- cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre(cp, pos_css, root_cs) {
- if (cp == root_cs) {
- if (!update_root)
- continue;
- } else {
- /* skip the whole subtree if @cp have some CPU */
- if (!nodes_empty(cp->mems_allowed)) {
- pos_css = css_rightmost_descendant(pos_css);
- continue;
- }
+ cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre(cp, pos_css, cs) {
+ struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cp);
+
+ nodes_and(*new_mems, cp->mems_allowed, parent->effective_mems);
+
+ /* Skip the whole subtree if the nodemask remains the same. */
+ if (nodes_equal(*new_mems, cp->effective_mems)) {
+ pos_css = css_rightmost_descendant(pos_css);
+ continue;
}
+
if (!css_tryget_online(&cp->css))
continue;
rcu_read_unlock();
+ mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+ cp->effective_mems = *new_mems;
+ mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+
+ WARN_ON(!cgroup_on_dfl(cp->css.cgroup) &&
+ nodes_equal(cp->mems_allowed, cp->effective_mems));
+
update_tasks_nodemask(cp);
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -1188,7 +1207,8 @@ static int update_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
cs->mems_allowed = trialcs->mems_allowed;
mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
- update_tasks_nodemask_hier(cs, true);
+ /* use trialcs->mems_allowed as a temp variable */
+ update_nodemasks_hier(cs, &cs->mems_allowed);
done:
return retval;
}
--
1.8.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-09 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-09 8:46 [PATCH v3 00/12] cpuset: separate configured masks and effective masks Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] cpuset: add cs->effective_cpus and cs->effective_mems Li Zefan
2014-07-09 16:47 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] cpuset: update cpuset->effective_{cpus,mems} at hotplug Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:47 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2014-07-09 19:57 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] cpuset: update cs->effective_{cpus,mems} when config changes Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] cpuset: inherit ancestor's masks if effective_{cpus,mems} becomes empty Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] cpuset: use effective cpumask to build sched domains Li Zefan
2014-07-09 19:18 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 8:48 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] cpuset: initialize top_cpuset's configured masks at mount Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:48 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] cpuset: apply cs->effective_{cpus,mems} Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:48 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] cpuset: make cs->{cpus,mems}_allowed as user-configured masks Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:48 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] cpuset: refactor cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks() Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] cpuset: enable onlined cpu/node in effective masks Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] cpuset: allow writing offlined masks to cpuset.cpus/mems Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] cpuset: export effective masks to userspace Li Zefan
2014-07-09 20:15 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 20:24 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] cpuset: separate configured masks and effective masks Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53BD01A1.2060302@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome