From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 10/12] cpuset: enable onlined cpu/node in effective masks
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 16:49:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BD0200.9050105@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53BD0174.4060002@huawei.com>
Firstly offline cpu1:
# echo 0-1 > cpuset.cpus
# echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
# cat cpuset.cpus
0-1
# cat cpuset.effective_cpus
0
Then online it:
# echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
# cat cpuset.cpus
0-1
# cat cpuset.effective_cpus
0-1
And cpuset will bring it back to the effective mask.
The implementation is quite straightforward. Instead of calculating the
offlined cpus/mems and do updates, we just set the new effective_mask
to online_mask & congifured_mask.
This is a behavior change for default hierarchy, so legacy hierarchy
won't be affected.
v2:
- make refactoring of cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks() as seperate patch,
suggested by Tejun.
- make hotplug_update_tasks_insane() use @new_cpus and @new_mems as
hotplug_update_tasks_sane() does.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
kernel/cpuset.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 41822e2..c47cb94 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -2080,26 +2080,27 @@ static void remove_tasks_in_empty_cpuset(struct cpuset *cs)
}
}
-static void hotplug_update_tasks_legacy(struct cpuset *cs,
- struct cpumask *off_cpus,
- nodemask_t *off_mems)
+static void
+hotplug_update_tasks_legacy(struct cpuset *cs,
+ struct cpumask *new_cpus, nodemask_t *new_mems,
+ bool cpus_updated, bool mems_updated)
{
bool is_empty;
mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
- cpumask_andnot(cs->cpus_allowed, cs->cpus_allowed, off_cpus);
- cpumask_andnot(cs->effective_cpus, cs->effective_cpus, off_cpus);
- nodes_andnot(cs->mems_allowed, cs->mems_allowed, *off_mems);
- nodes_andnot(cs->effective_mems, cs->effective_mems, *off_mems);
+ cpumask_copy(cs->cpus_allowed, new_cpus);
+ cpumask_copy(cs->effective_cpus, new_cpus);
+ cs->mems_allowed = *new_mems;
+ cs->effective_mems = *new_mems;
mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
/*
* Don't call update_tasks_cpumask() if the cpuset becomes empty,
* as the tasks will be migratecd to an ancestor.
*/
- if (!cpumask_empty(off_cpus) && !cpumask_empty(cs->cpus_allowed))
+ if (cpus_updated && !cpumask_empty(cs->cpus_allowed))
update_tasks_cpumask(cs);
- if (!nodes_empty(*off_mems) && !nodes_empty(cs->mems_allowed))
+ if (mems_updated && !nodes_empty(cs->mems_allowed))
update_tasks_nodemask(cs);
is_empty = cpumask_empty(cs->cpus_allowed) ||
@@ -2118,24 +2119,24 @@ static void hotplug_update_tasks_legacy(struct cpuset *cs,
mutex_lock(&cpuset_mutex);
}
-static void hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs,
- struct cpumask *off_cpus,
- nodemask_t *off_mems)
+static void
+hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs,
+ struct cpumask *new_cpus, nodemask_t *new_mems,
+ bool cpus_updated, bool mems_updated)
{
+ if (cpumask_empty(new_cpus))
+ cpumask_copy(new_cpus, parent_cs(cs)->effective_cpus);
+ if (nodes_empty(*new_mems))
+ *new_mems = parent_cs(cs)->effective_mems;
+
mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
- cpumask_andnot(cs->effective_cpus, cs->effective_cpus, off_cpus);
- if (cpumask_empty(cs->effective_cpus))
- cpumask_copy(cs->effective_cpus,
- parent_cs(cs)->effective_cpus);
-
- nodes_andnot(cs->effective_mems, cs->effective_mems, *off_mems);
- if (nodes_empty(cs->effective_mems))
- cs->effective_mems = parent_cs(cs)->effective_mems;
+ cpumask_copy(cs->effective_cpus, new_cpus);
+ cs->effective_mems = *new_mems;
mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
- if (!cpumask_empty(off_cpus))
+ if (cpus_updated)
update_tasks_cpumask(cs);
- if (!nodes_empty(*off_mems))
+ if (mems_updated)
update_tasks_nodemask(cs);
}
@@ -2149,8 +2150,10 @@ static void hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs,
*/
static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs)
{
- static cpumask_t off_cpus;
- static nodemask_t off_mems;
+ static cpumask_t new_cpus;
+ static nodemask_t new_mems;
+ bool cpus_updated;
+ bool mems_updated;
retry:
wait_event(cpuset_attach_wq, cs->attach_in_progress == 0);
@@ -2165,14 +2168,18 @@ retry:
goto retry;
}
- cpumask_andnot(&off_cpus, cs->effective_cpus,
- top_cpuset.effective_cpus);
- nodes_andnot(off_mems, cs->effective_mems, top_cpuset.effective_mems);
+ cpumask_and(&new_cpus, cs->cpus_allowed, parent_cs(cs)->effective_cpus);
+ nodes_and(new_mems, cs->mems_allowed, parent_cs(cs)->effective_mems);
+
+ cpus_updated = !cpumask_equal(&new_cpus, cs->effective_cpus);
+ mems_updated = !nodes_equal(new_mems, cs->effective_mems);
if (cgroup_on_dfl(cs->css.cgroup))
- hotplug_update_tasks(cs, &off_cpus, &off_mems);
+ hotplug_update_tasks(cs, &new_cpus, &new_mems,
+ cpus_updated, mems_updated);
else
- hotplug_update_tasks_legacy(cs, &off_cpus, &off_mems);
+ hotplug_update_tasks_legacy(cs, &new_cpus, &new_mems,
+ cpus_updated, mems_updated);
mutex_unlock(&cpuset_mutex);
}
--
1.8.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-09 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-09 8:46 [PATCH v3 00/12] cpuset: separate configured masks and " Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] cpuset: add cs->effective_cpus and cs->effective_mems Li Zefan
2014-07-09 16:47 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] cpuset: update cpuset->effective_{cpus,mems} at hotplug Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] cpuset: update cs->effective_{cpus,mems} when config changes Li Zefan
2014-07-09 19:57 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] cpuset: inherit ancestor's masks if effective_{cpus,mems} becomes empty Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] cpuset: use effective cpumask to build sched domains Li Zefan
2014-07-09 19:18 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 8:48 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] cpuset: initialize top_cpuset's configured masks at mount Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:48 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] cpuset: apply cs->effective_{cpus,mems} Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:48 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] cpuset: make cs->{cpus,mems}_allowed as user-configured masks Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:48 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] cpuset: refactor cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks() Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:49 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2014-07-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] cpuset: allow writing offlined masks to cpuset.cpus/mems Li Zefan
2014-07-09 8:49 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] cpuset: export effective masks to userspace Li Zefan
2014-07-09 20:15 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 20:24 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-09 20:12 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] cpuset: separate configured masks and effective masks Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53BD0200.9050105@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome