From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <mingo@kernel.org>,
<dipankar@in.ibm.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>, <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
<tglx@linutronix.de>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
<dhowells@redhat.com>, <edumazet@google.com>,
<dvhart@linux.intel.com>, <fweisbec@gmail.com>, <oleg@redhat.com>,
<bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Add call_rcu_tasks()
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 08:33:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E177D9.2090105@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140805215510.GT8101@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 08/06/2014 05:55 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 08:47:55AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> On 08/04/2014 10:56 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 02:25:15PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 04:50:44AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>>>> OK, I will bite...
>>>>>
>>>>> What kinds of tasks are on a runqueue, but neither ->on_cpu nor
>>>>> PREEMPT_ACTIVE?
>>>>
>>>> Userspace tasks, they don't necessarily get PREEMPT_ACTIVE when
>>>> preempted. Now obviously you're not _that_ interested in userspace tasks
>>>> for this, so that might be ok.
>>>>
>>>> But the main point was, you cannot use ->on_cpu or PREEMPT_ACTIVE
>>>> without holding rq->lock.
>>>
>>> Hmm, maybe you can, we have the context switch in between setting
>>> ->on_cpu and clearing PREEMPT_ACTIVE and vice-versa.
>>>
>>> The context switch (obviously) provides a full barrier, so we might be
>>> able to -- with careful consideration -- read these two separate values
>>> and construct something usable from them.
>>>
>>> Something like:
>>>
>>> task_preempt_count(tsk) & PREEMPT_ACTIVE
>> the @tsk is running on_cpu, the above result is false.
>>> smp_rmb();
>>> tsk->on_cpu
>> now the @tsk is preempted, the above result also is false.
>>
>> so it is useless if we fetch the preempt_count and on_cpu in two separated
>> instructions. Maybe it would work if we also take tsk->nivcsw in consideration.
>> (I just noticed that tsk->n[i]vcsw are the version numbers for the tsk->on_cpu)
>>
>> bool task_on_cpu_or_preempted(tsk)
>> {
>> unsigned long saved_nivcsw;
>>
>> saved_nivcsw = task->nivcsw;
>> if (tsk->on_cpu)
>> return true;
>>
>> smp_rmb();
>>
>> if (task_preempt_count(tsk) & PREEMPT_ACTIVE)
>> return true;
>>
>> smp_rmb();
>>
>> if (tsk->on_cpu || task->nivcsw != saved_nivcsw)
>> return true;
>>
>> return false;
>> }
>>
>>>
>>> And because we set PREEMPT_ACTIVE before clearing on_cpu, this should
>>> race the right way (err towards the inclusive side).
>>>
>>> Obviously that wants a big fat comment...
>
> How about the following? Non-nohz_full userspace tasks are already covered
> courtesy of scheduling-clock interrupts, and this handles nohz_full usermode
> tasks.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> rcu: Make TASKS_RCU handle nohx_full= CPUs
>
> Currently TASKS_RCU would ignore a CPU running a task in nohz_full=
> usermode execution. There would be neither a context switch nor a
> scheduling-clock interrupt to tell TASKS_RCU that the task in question
> had passed through a quiescent state. The grace period would therefore
> extend indefinitely. This commit therefore makes RCU's dyntick-idle
> subsystem record the task_struct structure of the task that is running
> in dyntick-idle mode on each CPU. The TASKS_RCU grace period can
> then access this information and record a quiescent state on
> behalf of any CPU running in dyntick-idle usermode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index f504f797c9c8..777aac3a34c0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -1140,5 +1140,14 @@ static inline void rcu_sysidle_force_exit(void)
>
> #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE */
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> +struct task_struct *rcu_dynticks_task_cur(int cpu);
> +#else /* #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> +static inline struct task_struct *rcu_dynticks_task_cur(int cpu)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +#endif /* #else #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> +
>
> #endif /* __LINUX_RCUPDATE_H */
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 645a33efc0d4..86a0a7d5bbbd 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -526,6 +526,7 @@ static void rcu_eqs_enter_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval,
> atomic_inc(&rdtp->dynticks);
> smp_mb__after_atomic(); /* Force ordering with next sojourn. */
> WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1);
> + rcu_dynticks_task_enter(rdtp, current);
>
> /*
> * It is illegal to enter an extended quiescent state while
> @@ -642,6 +643,7 @@ void rcu_irq_exit(void)
> static void rcu_eqs_exit_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval,
> int user)
> {
> + rcu_dynticks_task_exit(rdtp);
What happen when the trampoline happens before rcu_eqs_exit_common()?
synchronize_sched() also skip this CPUs. I think, for all CPUs, only
real schedule is reliable.
> smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* Force ordering w/previous sojourn. */
> atomic_inc(&rdtp->dynticks);
> /* CPUs seeing atomic_inc() must see later RCU read-side crit sects */
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> index 0f69a79c5b7d..1e79fa1b7cbf 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> @@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ struct rcu_dynticks {
> /* Process level is worth LLONG_MAX/2. */
> int dynticks_nmi_nesting; /* Track NMI nesting level. */
> atomic_t dynticks; /* Even value for idle, else odd. */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> + struct task_struct *dynticks_tsk;
> +#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
> long long dynticks_idle_nesting;
> /* irq/process nesting level from idle. */
> @@ -579,6 +582,9 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_report_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, int isidle,
> static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void);
> static void rcu_sysidle_init_percpu_data(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp);
> static bool rcu_nohz_full_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp);
> +static void rcu_dynticks_task_enter(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp,
> + struct task_struct *t);
> +static void rcu_dynticks_task_exit(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp);
>
> #endif /* #ifndef RCU_TREE_NONCORE */
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index a86a363ea453..442d62edc564 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -2852,3 +2852,29 @@ static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void)
> set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(cpu));
> #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
> }
> +
> +/* Record the current task on dyntick-idle entry. */
> +static void rcu_dynticks_task_enter(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp,
> + struct task_struct *t)
> +{
> +#if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> + ACCESS_ONCE(rdtp->dynticks_tsk) = t;
> +#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> +}
> +
> +/* Record no current task on dyntick-idle exit. */
> +static void rcu_dynticks_task_exit(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp)
> +{
> + rcu_dynticks_task_enter(rdtp, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> +struct task_struct *rcu_dynticks_task_cur(int cpu)
> +{
> + struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
> + struct task_struct *t = ACCESS_ONCE(rdtp->dynticks_tsk);
> +
> + smp_read_barrier_depends(); /* Dereferences after fetch of "t". */
> + return t;
> +}
> +#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
> index ad2a8df43757..6ad6af2ab028 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
> @@ -481,6 +481,28 @@ static void check_holdout_task(struct task_struct *t,
> sched_show_task(current);
> }
>
> +/* Check for nohz_full CPUs executing in userspace. */
> +static void check_no_hz_full_tasks(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> + int cpu;
> + struct task_struct *t;
> +
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + cond_resched();
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + t = rcu_dynticks_task_cur(cpu);
> + if (t == NULL || is_idle_task(t)) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + continue;
> + }
> + if (ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_tasks_holdout))
> + ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_tasks_holdout) = 0;
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + }
> +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
> +}
> +
> /* RCU-tasks kthread that detects grace periods and invokes callbacks. */
> static int __noreturn rcu_tasks_kthread(void *arg)
> {
> @@ -584,6 +606,7 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_tasks_kthread(void *arg)
> lastreport = jiffies;
> firstreport = true;
> WARN_ON(signal_pending(current));
> + check_no_hz_full_tasks();
> rcu_read_lock();
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(t, &rcu_tasks_holdouts,
> rcu_tasks_holdout_list)
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-06 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-31 21:54 [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 0/9 Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 21:55 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Add call_rcu_tasks() Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 21:55 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 2/9] rcu: Provide cond_resched_rcu_qs() to force quiescent states in long loops Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 21:55 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 3/9] rcu: Add synchronous grace-period waiting for RCU-tasks Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-01 15:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-01 18:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-01 19:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-02 14:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-02 22:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-06 0:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-06 1:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-06 8:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-06 12:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-06 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-06 22:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-07 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-07 15:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-07 15:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-07 17:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-07 18:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-07 19:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-07 19:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-07 20:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-07 21:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-08 6:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 14:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-08 14:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-09 10:56 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-08 14:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 14:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-08 15:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 15:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-08 16:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 16:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-08 16:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 16:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-08 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 16:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 16:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-08 16:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-08 16:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 17:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-08 16:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-08 16:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 17:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-09 10:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-07 20:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-31 21:55 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 4/9] rcu: Export RCU-tasks APIs to GPL modules Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 21:55 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 5/9] rcutorture: Add torture tests for RCU-tasks Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 21:55 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 6/9] rcutorture: Add RCU-tasks test cases Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 21:55 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 7/9] rcu: Add stall-warning checks for RCU-tasks Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 21:55 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 8/9] rcu: Improve RCU-tasks energy efficiency Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 21:55 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 9/9] documentation: Add verbiage on RCU-tasks stall warning messages Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 23:57 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Add call_rcu_tasks() Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-01 2:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-01 15:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-01 1:15 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-08-01 1:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-01 1:31 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-08-01 2:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-01 14:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-01 18:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-01 18:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-02 23:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-03 12:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-03 22:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-04 13:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 13:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-01 18:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-02 22:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-02 14:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-02 22:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-03 13:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-03 22:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-04 0:37 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-08-04 1:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-04 13:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 13:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-04 13:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-04 13:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 19:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-04 19:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 1:28 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-08-04 7:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 8:18 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-08-04 11:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-04 12:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 12:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-04 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-05 0:47 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-08-05 21:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-06 0:27 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-08-06 0:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-06 0:33 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2014-08-06 0:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-06 22:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-07 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-07 15:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-07 16:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-07 17:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-08 19:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 20:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-09 6:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-09 12:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-09 16:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-09 16:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-09 18:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-09 18:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-10 1:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-10 8:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-11 3:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-11 11:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-11 16:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-10 1:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-10 8:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-10 16:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-11 3:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-11 3:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-09 18:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-10 1:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-10 15:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-11 3:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53E177D9.2090105@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome