From: Prakash Gupta <prakash.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Rob Clark <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Pratyush Brahma <pratyush.brahma@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Use pm_runtime in fault handlers
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 21:40:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53c051f3-3a72-4d8d-917e-3b9d1537443e@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aYsvacmKoLroXlrZ@google.com>
On 2/10/2026 6:45 PM, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 04:39:56PM +0530, Prakash Gupta wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/3/2026 1:44 AM, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 06:44:35PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>>> [ +Pranjal as this might matter for v3 too... ]
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Robin,
>>>
>>> To weigh in from the arm-smmu-v3 side, we’ve attempted to address the
>>> "can of worms" regarding power races by leaning on these differences:
>>>
>>> - Threaded IRQs for PRI/Events: In the recent series[1], the PRI and
>>> event handlers are fully threaded. This allows us to call
>>> arm_smmu_rpm_get() safely, as the handler can sleep while waiting for
>>> the hardware to resume.
>>>
>>> - GERROR Handling: Since GERROR remains a hard IRQ, we handle any
>>> pending gerrors in the suspend callback before the SMMU actually
>>> powers down. Any GERROR interrupts received while the device was
>>> suspended are treated as spurious and ignored.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Praan
>>
>> [1] refer to case where SMMU state is not retained during smmu device
>> power down, this I think is equally applicable for both context and
>> global faults.
>>
>> Since the ARM SMMU runtime resume triggers a device reset, any pending
>> faults would be cleared during resume. Here the solution can be to
>> handle both global and context faults before allowing the SMMU device to
>> suspend.
>> With this approach, any hard or threaded IRQ scheduled after the SMMU
>> device has suspended can be safely ignored.
>> One concern I see is iommu fault reporting to clients while handling
>> fault during smmu device suspend.
>
> I believe by the time we've reached suspend it's safe to assume that all
> clients have been suspended. Thus, we could simply not report the error
> and instead scream by having a dev_warn_ratelimited about the situation.
>
By reporting error I meant reporting the error to client with
report_iommu_fault(). I agree that if smmu device is being suspended the
dma devices should have suspended by now. If so, it should be safe to
just handle the fault excluding report_iommu_fault() in suspend path and
complete smmu device suspend. Will update in next patchset.
> Thanks,
> Praan
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Prakash
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260126151157.3418145-9-praan@google.com/
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-11 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-27 12:11 Prakash Gupta
2026-01-27 12:52 ` Akhil P Oommen
2026-01-27 16:05 ` Robin Murphy
2026-01-28 5:56 ` Prakash Gupta
2026-01-28 18:44 ` Robin Murphy
2026-01-29 16:03 ` Prakash Gupta
2026-02-02 20:14 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-02-10 11:09 ` Prakash Gupta
2026-02-10 13:15 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-02-11 16:10 ` Prakash Gupta [this message]
2026-02-11 16:59 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53c051f3-3a72-4d8d-917e-3b9d1537443e@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=prakash.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=akhilpo@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=cwabbott0@gmail.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=pratyush.brahma@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®