* Re: Questions about MTD + flash file system
[not found] <CAF-d49R64tbzk_2QnX3uwMc2LnpyzKmdfmY2D4P1=r+_DMi0fg@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2014-10-09 16:43 ` Richard Weinberger
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2014-10-09 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Wang, linux-mtd
Cc: dedeking1, linux-arm-msm, open list, Brian Norris,
David Woodhouse, Artem Bityutskiy
Am 09.10.2014 18:40, schrieb Wei Wang:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question about the MTD device for embedded applications. As typically designers are more likely to use an eMMC or block interface-based flash devices + a block-oriented
> file system for the storage system on an embedded system, what's the typical use case for the MTD + flash file system? What's the advantage of the later one against eMMC +
> block-oriented file system?
>
> If an eMMC becomes more powerful, is there any merits that is provided by using an raw flash device + flash file system?
Power cut resistance.
Thanks,
//richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2014-10-09 16:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CAF-d49R64tbzk_2QnX3uwMc2LnpyzKmdfmY2D4P1=r+_DMi0fg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-10-09 16:43 ` Questions about MTD + flash file system Richard Weinberger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®