mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Barto <mister.freeman@laposte.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@hp.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: BUG in scsi_lib.c due to a bad commit
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 19:30:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5468ED63.4010709@laposte.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141114073214.GA1879@infradead.org>

Hello everyone,

> Also, SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY seems like an arbitrary magic number;
> maybe that value isn't working correctly anymore?

this is an excellent remark from Robert Elliot,

this gives me an idea : try to set manually a value in the if()
statement ( line 1779 in file /drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c )

by default the value of SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY is 3 ms, which might be
inapropriate with some slow harddisks and with the changes made by the
commit
74665016086615bbaa3fa6f83af410a0a4e029ee ( scsi: convert host_busy to
atomic_t ),

after further tests I discover that the value 40 ms solves my problem,
the bug is gone with this value,

here is the patch who sets 40 ms in the if() statement :

--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c	2014-10-05 21:23:04.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c	2014-11-16 17:39:16.819674725 +0100
@@ -1776,7 +1776,7 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(struct reque
 	atomic_dec(&sdev->device_busy);
 out_delay:
 	if (!atomic_read(&sdev->device_busy) && !scsi_device_blocked(sdev))
-		blk_delay_queue(q, SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY);
+		blk_delay_queue(q, 40);
 }

 static inline int prep_to_mq(int ret)

with this patch the value of SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY is still 3 ms, but here we
use 40 ms only in a specific part of scsi_lib.c file ( line 1779, it's
this part where the bug seems to be triggered, so that's why I set 40 ms
here in the blk_delay_queue() function )

after applying this patch I don't see problems related to I/O
performance/speed, all is ok,

the question is now : why putting a higher value in line 1779 does solve
the bug ?
and why before the commit 74665016086615bbaa3fa6f83af410a0a4e029ee I
don't have problems even with a value of 3 ms for SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY ?



Le 14/11/2014 08:32, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:55:38PM +0100, Barto wrote:
>> it's interesting, with this commit
>> 74665016086615bbaa3fa6f83af410a0a4e029ee I have the bug :
>>
>> scsi: convert host_busy to atomic_t :
> 
> At this point we'll need a bisction between v3.16 as the last good
> point, and 74665016086615bbaa3fa6f83af410a0a4e029ee as the known bad
> point.
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-16 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-11 23:33 Barto
2014-11-12  0:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-11-12  2:53   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-11-13  3:28     ` Barto
2014-11-13  5:33       ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2014-11-13  9:38         ` Barto
2014-11-13 14:29           ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-13 15:13             ` Barto
2014-11-13 17:14             ` Barto
2014-11-13 17:54               ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-13 22:55                 ` Barto
2014-11-14  7:32                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-14 16:30                     ` Barto
2014-11-16 18:30                     ` Barto [this message]
2014-11-19 20:21                     ` Barto
2014-11-20  6:09 Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-20 17:44 ` Barto
2014-11-20 17:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-20 18:27     ` Barto
2014-11-24  9:18       ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-24 15:12         ` Barto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5468ED63.4010709@laposte.net \
    --to=mister.freeman@laposte.net \
    --cc=Elliott@hp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome