From: Barto <mister.freeman@laposte.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@hp.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: BUG in scsi_lib.c due to a bad commit
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 19:30:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5468ED63.4010709@laposte.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141114073214.GA1879@infradead.org>
Hello everyone,
> Also, SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY seems like an arbitrary magic number;
> maybe that value isn't working correctly anymore?
this is an excellent remark from Robert Elliot,
this gives me an idea : try to set manually a value in the if()
statement ( line 1779 in file /drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c )
by default the value of SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY is 3 ms, which might be
inapropriate with some slow harddisks and with the changes made by the
commit
74665016086615bbaa3fa6f83af410a0a4e029ee ( scsi: convert host_busy to
atomic_t ),
after further tests I discover that the value 40 ms solves my problem,
the bug is gone with this value,
here is the patch who sets 40 ms in the if() statement :
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2014-10-05 21:23:04.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2014-11-16 17:39:16.819674725 +0100
@@ -1776,7 +1776,7 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(struct reque
atomic_dec(&sdev->device_busy);
out_delay:
if (!atomic_read(&sdev->device_busy) && !scsi_device_blocked(sdev))
- blk_delay_queue(q, SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY);
+ blk_delay_queue(q, 40);
}
static inline int prep_to_mq(int ret)
with this patch the value of SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY is still 3 ms, but here we
use 40 ms only in a specific part of scsi_lib.c file ( line 1779, it's
this part where the bug seems to be triggered, so that's why I set 40 ms
here in the blk_delay_queue() function )
after applying this patch I don't see problems related to I/O
performance/speed, all is ok,
the question is now : why putting a higher value in line 1779 does solve
the bug ?
and why before the commit 74665016086615bbaa3fa6f83af410a0a4e029ee I
don't have problems even with a value of 3 ms for SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY ?
Le 14/11/2014 08:32, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:55:38PM +0100, Barto wrote:
>> it's interesting, with this commit
>> 74665016086615bbaa3fa6f83af410a0a4e029ee I have the bug :
>>
>> scsi: convert host_busy to atomic_t :
>
> At this point we'll need a bisction between v3.16 as the last good
> point, and 74665016086615bbaa3fa6f83af410a0a4e029ee as the known bad
> point.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-16 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-11 23:33 Barto
2014-11-12 0:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-11-12 2:53 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-11-13 3:28 ` Barto
2014-11-13 5:33 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2014-11-13 9:38 ` Barto
2014-11-13 14:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-13 15:13 ` Barto
2014-11-13 17:14 ` Barto
2014-11-13 17:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-13 22:55 ` Barto
2014-11-14 7:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-14 16:30 ` Barto
2014-11-16 18:30 ` Barto [this message]
2014-11-19 20:21 ` Barto
2014-11-20 6:09 Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-20 17:44 ` Barto
2014-11-20 17:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-20 18:27 ` Barto
2014-11-24 9:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-24 15:12 ` Barto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5468ED63.4010709@laposte.net \
--to=mister.freeman@laposte.net \
--cc=Elliott@hp.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome