From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, <paul@pwsan.com>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <balbi@ti.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: omap2+: omap_hwmod: Fix false lockdep warning
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 10:27:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D86F74.7070703@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D5154F.8080208@ti.com>
On 02/06/2015 09:26 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Yeah, I've never really bothered with data too much, its a debug
>> feature. So lock_class_key is 8 bytes, and strictly speaking you could
>> union them over other fields, all we really need is unique addresses, we
>> don't actually use the storage.
>
> True. our omap2plus defconfig does not have LOCKDEP enabled so it should not
> add anything to the data when running default kernel.
> I'll test the lockdep_set_class() method you suggested on Monday (not
> tomorrow), but still as first thing.
> If it is working as expected I'll send a patch with you as author.
With omap2plus_defconfig my build produces (vmlinux size):
Base: 99905522
with my series: 99908385 (base + 2863)
with Peter Zijlstra's patch: 99910625 (base + 5103)
The reason for this is that we will only have
struct lock_class_key { };
in case of !CONFIG_LOCKDEP. On ARM however CONFIG_LOCKDEP is enabled by
default, while the CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP is disabled.
So it does add more data to our default omap2plus config.
Tony: do you have preference on the way we fix this issue?
As I recall there is a plan to remove the hwmod static database and move it or
generate it from DT? Not sure when and how this will be done, but will it
affect the lockdep_set_class() way?
--
Péter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-09 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-06 12:48 Peter Ujfalusi
2015-02-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: omap2+: omap_hwmod: Use _nested version of spinlock for oh->_lock Peter Ujfalusi
2015-02-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: DRA7: hwmod_data: Change locked_class for atl hwmod Peter Ujfalusi
2015-02-06 14:13 ` [PATCH 0/2] ARM: omap2+: omap_hwmod: Fix false lockdep warning Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-06 16:05 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-02-06 18:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-06 19:26 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-02-09 8:27 ` Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2015-02-09 9:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-09 16:00 ` Paul Walmsley
2015-02-09 17:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-09 18:55 ` Paul Walmsley
2015-02-09 22:16 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54D86F74.7070703@ti.com \
--to=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome