Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: qla2xxx: Fix double free of fcport in qla24xx_els_dcmd_iocb

[Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>]

* I would usually expect a corresponding cover letter for patch series.

* Would you like to add parentheses to the function name in the summary phrase?


> When dma_alloc_coherent() or qla2x00_start_sp() return an error,

                                                  call returned?


> the callback function qla2x00_els_dcmd_sp_free in qla2x00_sp_release
> will call qla2x00_free_fcport() to kfree fcport. We shouldn't call

                                     free “fcport”?


> qla2x00_free_fcport() again in the error handling path.

                                                    paths?



> Fix this by cleaning the duplicate qla2x00_free_fcport() calls up.

Would the wording “Thus delete duplicate qla2x00_free_fcport() calls.” be a bit nicer?


…
> ---
> V2 -> V3: Improve patch summary and provide a patch serises with two separate update steps
…

* How do you think about to avoid the repetition of version identifiers
  (according to the selected enumeration style)?

* You would probably like to avoid another typo here.

Regards,
Markus