Re: arm qemu boot failures in -next due to 'PM / Domains: add setter for dev.pm_domain'

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>]

On Monday, January 11, 2016 12:48:19 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:14:31PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > [Adding Rafael]
> > 
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > 
> > >> I see 6 out of 24 arm qemu tests failing in next-20160111. Bisect points
> > >> to commit 989561de9b51 ("PM / Domains: add setter for dev.pm_domain").
> > >> Failures are silent - there is no output on the console.
> > >> Affected tests are
> > >>
> > >> arm:beagle:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-beagle
> > >> arm:beaglexm:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-beagle-xm
> > >> arm:overo:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-overo-tobi
> > >> arm:beagle:omap2plus_defconfig:omap3-beagle
> > >> arm:beaglexm:omap2plus_defconfig:omap3-beagle-xm
> > >> arm:overo:omap2plus_defconfig:omap3-overo-tobi
> > >>
> > >> For details please see the 'next' column at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
> > >>
> > >> Reverting the offending commit fixes the problems.
> > >>
> > >> Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help tracking down the problem.
> > >
> > > The following fixes the booting, but I wonder if it's a
> > > proper fix?
> > >
> > > --- a/drivers/base/power/common.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/base/power/common.c
> > > @@ -145,9 +145,10 @@ void dev_pm_domain_set(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_domain *pd)
> > >  {
> > >         if (dev->pm_domain == pd)
> > >                 return;
> > > -
> > > -       WARN(device_is_bound(dev),
> > > -            "PM domains can only be changed for unbound devices\n");
> > > +       if (device_is_registered(dev)) {
> > > +               WARN(device_is_bound(dev),
> > > +                    "PM domains can only be changed for unbound devices\n");
> > > +       }
> > >         dev->pm_domain = pd;
> > >         device_pm_check_callbacks(dev);
> > 
> > Commit 989561de9b51 ("PM / Domains: add setter for dev.pm_domain")
> > causes issues for me after doing a 'reboot' command.
> > 
> > Rafael proposed a patch which fixed the 'reboot' problem:
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg473562.html
> 
> Looks like a different problem.

Yes, it is a different problem.

Fabio, thanks for CCing me.

Thanks,
Rafael