From: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
"Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>, pi3orama <pi3orama@163.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: "rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com"
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
"acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>,
"a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"jolsa@kernel.org" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 19:54:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B0D5FC.6050406@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A88449.3030008@plumgrid.com>
Hi, Alexi
Thank you for your guidence, and by referencing your last mail
and other llvm backends, I found setting
BPFMCAsmInfo::SupportsDebugInformation = true in BPFMCAsmInfo.h
and fix some unhandeled switch can make llc output debug_info,
but important information is missing in the result:
bpf:
<1><2a>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
<2b> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x0
<33> DW_AT_high_pc : 0x60
<37> Unknown AT value: 3fe7: 1
<37> DW_AT_frame_base : 1 byte block: 5a (DW_OP_reg10 (r10))
<39> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x0): clang
version 3.7.0 (http://llvm.org/git/clang.git..
<3d> DW_AT_decl_file : 1
<3e> DW_AT_decl_line : 3
<3f> DW_AT_prototyped : 1
<3f> DW_AT_type : <0x65>
<43> DW_AT_external : 1
<43> Unknown AT value: 3fe1: 1
<2><43>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_formal_parameter)
<44> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x0): clang
version 3.7.0 (http://llvm.org/git/clang.git..
<48> DW_AT_decl_file : 1
<49> DW_AT_decl_line : 3
<4a> DW_AT_type : <0x65>
Compares to x86 platform result:
<1><26>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
<27> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x0
<2b> DW_AT_high_pc : 0x16
<2f> Unknown AT value: 3fe7: 1
<2f> DW_AT_frame_base : 1 byte block: 54 (DW_OP_reg4 (esp))
<31> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0xcf): testprog
<35> DW_AT_decl_file : 1
<36> DW_AT_decl_line : 3
<37> DW_AT_prototyped : 1
<37> DW_AT_type : <0x65>
<3b> DW_AT_external : 1
<3b> Unknown AT value: 3fe1: 1
<2><3b>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_formal_parameter)
<3c> DW_AT_location : 2 byte block: 91 4 (DW_OP_fbreg: 4)
<3f> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0xdc): myvar_a
<43> DW_AT_decl_file : 1
<44> DW_AT_decl_line : 3
<45> DW_AT_type : <0x65>
The bpf result lacks of DW_AT_location, and DW_AT_name gives no
infomation.
Then I used 'llc print-after*' command to check each pass and
wanted to find by which step the debug infomation is dropped,
things looks similar until the passes between 'verify' and
'expand-isel-pseudos':
x86:
$ llc -march=x86 --print-before-all -print-after-all
-stop-after=expand-isel-pseudos test.ll
# *** IR Dump Before Expand ISel Pseudo-instructions ***:
# Machine code for function testprog: SSA
Frame Objects:
fi#-2: size=4, align=4, fixed, at location [SP+8]
fi#-1: size=4, align=16, fixed, at location [SP+4]
BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry
DBG_VALUE <fi#-1>, 0, !"myvar_a", <!15>; line no:3
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
DBG_VALUE <fi#-2>, 0, !"myvar_b", <!15>; line no:3
%vreg0<def> = MOV32rm <fi#-2>, 1, %noreg, 0, %noreg; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2]
; GR32:%vreg0
bpf:
$ llc -march=bpf --print-before-all -print-after-all
-stop-after=expand-isel-pseudos test.ll
# *** IR Dump Before Expand ISel Pseudo-instructions ***:
# Machine code for function testprog: SSA
Function Live Ins: %R1 in %vreg0, %R2 in %vreg1
BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry
Live Ins: %R1 %R2
%vreg1<def> = COPY %R2; GPR:%vreg1
%vreg0<def> = COPY %R1; GPR:%vreg0
%vreg2<def> = LD_imm64 2147483648; GPR:%vreg2
I think maybe this missing 'DBG_VALUE' causes the problem, but
I'm stuck here and hope you can give more advice.
Thank you!
On 2015/7/17 12:27, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> clang -O2 -emit-llvm -g a.c -S -o a.ll
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-23 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-10 10:03 [RFC PATCH v4 0/3] Make eBPF programs output " He Kuang
2015-07-10 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/3] tracing/events: Fix wrong sample output by storing array length instead of size He Kuang
2015-07-17 14:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-17 17:24 ` Sara Rostedt
2015-07-17 18:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-23 19:36 ` Alex Bennée
2015-07-10 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/3] tools lib traceevent: Add function to get dynamic arrays length He Kuang
2015-07-10 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event He Kuang
2015-07-10 22:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-13 4:36 ` He Kuang
2015-07-13 13:52 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-07-13 14:01 ` pi3orama
2015-07-13 14:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-07-13 14:29 ` pi3orama
2015-07-14 1:43 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-14 11:54 ` He Kuang
2015-07-17 4:11 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-17 4:14 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-07-17 4:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-23 11:54 ` He Kuang [this message]
2015-07-23 20:49 ` llvm bpf debug info. " Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-24 3:20 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-24 4:16 ` He Kuang
2015-07-25 10:04 ` He Kuang
2015-07-28 2:18 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-29 9:38 ` He Kuang
2015-07-29 17:13 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-29 20:00 ` pi3orama
2015-07-29 22:20 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-31 10:18 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-07-31 10:20 ` [LLVM PATCH] BPF: add FRAMEADDR support Wang Nan
2015-07-31 10:21 ` [LLVM CLANG PATCH] BPF: add __builtin_bpf_typeid() Wang Nan
2015-07-31 10:48 ` llvm bpf debug info. Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event pi3orama
2015-08-03 19:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-08-04 9:01 ` Cc llvmdev: " Wangnan (F)
2015-08-05 1:58 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-08-05 2:05 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-08-05 6:51 ` [LLVMdev] " Wangnan (F)
2015-08-05 7:11 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-08-05 8:28 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-08-06 3:22 ` [llvm-dev] " Alexei Starovoitov
2015-08-06 4:35 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-08-06 6:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-08-12 2:34 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-08-12 4:57 ` [llvm-dev] " Alexei Starovoitov
2015-08-12 5:28 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-08-12 13:15 ` Brenden Blanco
2015-08-13 6:24 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-08-05 8:59 ` [LLVMdev] Cc llvmdev: " He Kuang
2015-08-06 3:41 ` [llvm-dev] " Alexei Starovoitov
2015-08-06 4:31 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-08-06 6:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-13 8:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B0D5FC.6050406@huawei.com \
--to=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pi3orama@163.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome