mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locktorture: fix wrong parameter handling
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 16:53:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5617D4FD.3030803@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151009144650.GR3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Am 09.10.2015 um 16:46 schrieb Paul E. McKenney:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 02:14:45PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Calling locktorture with a wrong parameter makes it
>> unusable:
>>
>> $ modprobe locktorture torture_type=help
>> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'locktorture': Invalid argument
>>
>> $ modprobe locktorture torture_type=spin_lock
>> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'locktorture': Device or resource busy
>>
>> $ dmesg
>> [...]
>> torture_init_begin: refusing spin_lock init: help running
>>
>> We can easily do the checking before call into the torture framework.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> 
> Good catch, thank you!
> 
> Could you please port this to rcu/next in the -rcu tree?  Also, please
> capitalize the word following the ":" in the subject line, as in "[PATCH]
> locktorture: Fix wrong parameter handling".

Hmmm, seems that this is already fixed in rcu/next with

commit a36a99618b1adb2d6ca0b7e08e3a656a04e477fe
Author:     Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Sun Aug 30 20:01:48 2015 -0700
Commit:     Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CommitDate: Tue Oct 6 11:28:44 2015 -0700

    locktorture: Fix module unwind when bad torture_type specified
    

No need to respin a patch it seems :-)



  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-09 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-09 12:14 Christian Borntraeger
2015-10-09 14:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-09 14:53   ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2015-10-09 15:44     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5617D4FD.3030803@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome