From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/3] bpf: enable non-root eBPF programs
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 19:45:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5617FD1C.2030702@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5617F9C9.10407@plumgrid.com>
On 10/09/2015 07:30 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
...
> Openstack use case is different. There it will be prog_type_sched_cls
> that can mangle packets, change skb metadata, etc under TC framework.
> These are not suitable for all users and this patch leaves
> them root-only. If you're proposing to add CAP_BPF_TC to let containers
> use them without being CAP_SYS_ADMIN, then I agree, it is useful, but
> needs a lot more safety analysis on tc side.
Well, I think if so, then this would need to be something generic for
tc instead of being specific to a single (out of various) entities
inside the tc framework, but I currently doubt that this makes much
sense. If we allow to operate already at that level, then restricting
to CAP_SYS_ADMIN makes more sense in that specific context/subsys to me.
Best,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-09 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-08 5:23 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] bpf: unprivileged Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-08 5:23 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/3] bpf: enable non-root eBPF programs Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-08 17:45 ` Kees Cook
2015-10-08 18:20 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-10-08 22:05 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-09 11:45 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-10-09 17:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-09 17:45 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2015-10-09 17:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-09 9:28 ` Thomas Graf
2015-10-08 5:23 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/3] bpf: charge user for creation of BPF maps and programs Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-08 5:23 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] bpf: add unprivileged bpf tests Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-08 17:46 ` Kees Cook
2015-10-08 17:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-13 2:22 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] bpf: unprivileged David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5617FD1C.2030702@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome