From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] firmware: arm_scpi: add support for 64-bit sensor values
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:40:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C27E0B.5070600@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455028377-12728-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
On 02/09/2016 06:32 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> SCPI specification version 1.1 extended the sensor from 32-bit to 64-bit
> values in order to accommodate new sensor class with 64-bit requirements
>
> Since the SCPI driver sets the higher 32-bit for older protocol version
> to zeros, there's no need to explicitly check the SCPI protocol version
> and the backward compatibility is maintainted.
>
> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c | 8 +++++---
> drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c | 6 +++---
> include/linux/scpi_protocol.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Hi Guenter,
>
> Since I have couple of other fixes for SCPI driver, if you can provide
> your ACKs to this couple of patches after your review, I can take all of
> them together via ARM-SoC if that's fine with you.
>
> Regards,
> Sudeep
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
> index c32ac6e61ba2..7e3e595c9f30 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
> @@ -231,7 +231,8 @@ struct _scpi_sensor_info {
> };
>
> struct sensor_value {
> - __le32 val;
> + __le32 lo_val;
> + __le32 hi_val;
> } __packed;
>
> static struct scpi_drvinfo *scpi_info;
> @@ -525,7 +526,7 @@ static int scpi_sensor_get_info(u16 sensor_id, struct scpi_sensor_info *info)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -int scpi_sensor_get_value(u16 sensor, u32 *val)
> +int scpi_sensor_get_value(u16 sensor, u64 *val)
> {
> __le16 id = cpu_to_le16(sensor);
> struct sensor_value buf;
> @@ -534,7 +535,8 @@ int scpi_sensor_get_value(u16 sensor, u32 *val)
> ret = scpi_send_message(SCPI_CMD_SENSOR_VALUE, &id, sizeof(id),
> &buf, sizeof(buf));
> if (!ret)
> - *val = le32_to_cpu(buf.val);
> + *val = (u64)le32_to_cpu(buf.hi_val) << 32 |
> + le32_to_cpu(buf.lo_val);
>
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c b/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c
> index 7e20567bc369..7101b14b5137 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static int scpi_read_temp(void *dev, int *temp)
> struct scpi_sensors *scpi_sensors = zone->scpi_sensors;
> struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops = scpi_sensors->scpi_ops;
> struct sensor_data *sensor = &scpi_sensors->data[zone->sensor_id];
> - u32 value;
> + u64 value;
> int ret;
>
> ret = scpi_ops->sensor_get_value(sensor->info.sensor_id, &value);
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ scpi_show_sensor(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> struct scpi_sensors *scpi_sensors = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops = scpi_sensors->scpi_ops;
> struct sensor_data *sensor;
> - u32 value;
> + u64 value;
> int ret;
>
> sensor = container_of(attr, struct sensor_data, dev_attr_input);
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ scpi_show_sensor(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", value);
> + return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", value);
> }
>
> static ssize_t
> diff --git a/include/linux/scpi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scpi_protocol.h
> index 72ce932c69b2..ecd248d46281 100644
> --- a/include/linux/scpi_protocol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/scpi_protocol.h
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ struct scpi_ops {
> struct scpi_dvfs_info *(*dvfs_get_info)(u8);
> int (*sensor_get_capability)(u16 *sensors);
> int (*sensor_get_info)(u16 sensor_id, struct scpi_sensor_info *);
> - int (*sensor_get_value)(u16, u32 *);
> + int (*sensor_get_value)(u16, u64 *);
> };
>
> #if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_ARM_SCPI_PROTOCOL)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-16 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-09 14:32 Sudeep Holla
2016-02-09 14:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (scpi) add energy meter support Sudeep Holla
2016-02-15 18:38 ` Punit Agrawal
2016-02-16 1:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-02-15 18:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] firmware: arm_scpi: add support for 64-bit sensor values Punit Agrawal
2016-02-16 1:40 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C27E0B.5070600@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®