From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC v0] Use swait in completion
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 19:07:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DF14D4.4010203@bmw-carit.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160308175206.GD21842@linutronix.de>
On 03/08/2016 06:52 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> However I don't think if your DEFER flag solution is all that bad. I
> have also the block-mq in -RT using swait and they perform wakes with
> irqs-off. Not in -RT but mainline. So me might need something to make it
> work properly. But if we defer the wakeup they might come at us and
> complain about the latency…
I intended to extend the test code to measure the latency diff as well.
Just to get a feeling how bad it is. At least with a lot of waiters on
the completion the current measurement indicate an improvement. I guess
with real workload the things look quite different.
cheers,
daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-08 15:59 Daniel Wagner
2016-03-08 15:59 ` [RFC v0] sched/completion: convert completions to use simple wait queues Daniel Wagner
2016-03-08 17:52 ` [RFC v0] Use swait in completion Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-03-08 18:07 ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2016-03-08 18:26 ` Josh Cartwright
2016-03-09 12:24 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-03-28 18:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-03-31 6:14 ` Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56DF14D4.4010203@bmw-carit.de \
--to=daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wagi@monom.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome