* [PATCH] ocfs2: get rid of ocfs2_is_o2cb_active function
@ 2017-05-22 8:17 Gang He
2017-05-22 9:16 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joseph Qi
2017-06-22 1:23 ` Eric Ren
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gang He @ 2017-05-22 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mfasheh, jlbec; +Cc: Gang He, linux-kernel, ocfs2-devel, akpm
This patch is used to get rid of ocfs2_is_o2cb_active() function,
Why? First, we had the similar functions to identify which cluster
stack is being used via osb->osb_cluster_stack. Second, the current
implementation of ocfs2_is_o2cb_active() function is not total safe,
base on the design of stackglue, we need to get ocfs2_stack_lock lock
before using ocfs2_stack related data structures, and that
active_stack pointer can be NULL in case mount failure.
Signed-off-by: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 2 +-
fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c | 6 ------
fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h | 3 ---
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
index 3b7c937..a54196a 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
@@ -3409,7 +3409,7 @@ static int ocfs2_downconvert_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
* we can recover correctly from node failure. Otherwise, we may get
* invalid LVB in LKB, but without DLM_SBF_VALNOTVALID being set.
*/
- if (!ocfs2_is_o2cb_active() &&
+ if (ocfs2_userspace_stack(osb) &&
lockres->l_ops->flags & LOCK_TYPE_USES_LVB)
lvb = 1;
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c
index 8203590..52c07346b 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c
@@ -48,12 +48,6 @@
*/
static struct ocfs2_stack_plugin *active_stack;
-inline int ocfs2_is_o2cb_active(void)
-{
- return !strcmp(active_stack->sp_name, OCFS2_STACK_PLUGIN_O2CB);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ocfs2_is_o2cb_active);
-
static struct ocfs2_stack_plugin *ocfs2_stack_lookup(const char *name)
{
struct ocfs2_stack_plugin *p;
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h b/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h
index e3036e1..f2dce10 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h
@@ -298,9 +298,6 @@ int ocfs2_plock(struct ocfs2_cluster_connection *conn, u64 ino,
int ocfs2_stack_glue_register(struct ocfs2_stack_plugin *plugin);
void ocfs2_stack_glue_unregister(struct ocfs2_stack_plugin *plugin);
-/* In ocfs2_downconvert_lock(), we need to know which stack we are using */
-int ocfs2_is_o2cb_active(void);
-
extern struct kset *ocfs2_kset;
#endif /* STACKGLUE_H */
--
1.8.5.6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: get rid of ocfs2_is_o2cb_active function
2017-05-22 8:17 [PATCH] ocfs2: get rid of ocfs2_is_o2cb_active function Gang He
@ 2017-05-22 9:16 ` Joseph Qi
2017-06-22 1:23 ` Eric Ren
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Qi @ 2017-05-22 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gang He, mfasheh, jlbec; +Cc: linux-kernel, ocfs2-devel
On 17/5/22 16:17, Gang He wrote:
> This patch is used to get rid of ocfs2_is_o2cb_active() function,
> Why? First, we had the similar functions to identify which cluster
> stack is being used via osb->osb_cluster_stack. Second, the current
> implementation of ocfs2_is_o2cb_active() function is not total safe,
> base on the design of stackglue, we need to get ocfs2_stack_lock lock
> before using ocfs2_stack related data structures, and that
> active_stack pointer can be NULL in case mount failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
Thanks,
Joseph
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 2 +-
> fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c | 6 ------
> fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h | 3 ---
> 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> index 3b7c937..a54196a 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> @@ -3409,7 +3409,7 @@ static int ocfs2_downconvert_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
> * we can recover correctly from node failure. Otherwise, we may get
> * invalid LVB in LKB, but without DLM_SBF_VALNOTVALID being set.
> */
> - if (!ocfs2_is_o2cb_active() &&
> + if (ocfs2_userspace_stack(osb) &&
> lockres->l_ops->flags & LOCK_TYPE_USES_LVB)
> lvb = 1;
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c
> index 8203590..52c07346b 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c
> @@ -48,12 +48,6 @@
> */
> static struct ocfs2_stack_plugin *active_stack;
>
> -inline int ocfs2_is_o2cb_active(void)
> -{
> - return !strcmp(active_stack->sp_name, OCFS2_STACK_PLUGIN_O2CB);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ocfs2_is_o2cb_active);
> -
> static struct ocfs2_stack_plugin *ocfs2_stack_lookup(const char *name)
> {
> struct ocfs2_stack_plugin *p;
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h b/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h
> index e3036e1..f2dce10 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h
> @@ -298,9 +298,6 @@ int ocfs2_plock(struct ocfs2_cluster_connection *conn, u64 ino,
> int ocfs2_stack_glue_register(struct ocfs2_stack_plugin *plugin);
> void ocfs2_stack_glue_unregister(struct ocfs2_stack_plugin *plugin);
>
> -/* In ocfs2_downconvert_lock(), we need to know which stack we are using */
> -int ocfs2_is_o2cb_active(void);
> -
> extern struct kset *ocfs2_kset;
>
> #endif /* STACKGLUE_H */
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: get rid of ocfs2_is_o2cb_active function
2017-05-22 8:17 [PATCH] ocfs2: get rid of ocfs2_is_o2cb_active function Gang He
2017-05-22 9:16 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joseph Qi
@ 2017-06-22 1:23 ` Eric Ren
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Ren @ 2017-06-22 1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gang He, mfasheh, jlbec; +Cc: linux-kernel, ocfs2-devel
On 05/22/17 16:17, Gang He wrote:
> This patch is used to get rid of ocfs2_is_o2cb_active() function,
> Why? First, we had the similar functions to identify which cluster
> stack is being used via osb->osb_cluster_stack. Second, the current
> implementation of ocfs2_is_o2cb_active() function is not total safe,
> base on the design of stackglue, we need to get ocfs2_stack_lock lock
> before using ocfs2_stack related data structures, and that
> active_stack pointer can be NULL in case mount failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Eric Ren <zren@suse.com>
Eric
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 2 +-
> fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c | 6 ------
> fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h | 3 ---
> 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> index 3b7c937..a54196a 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> @@ -3409,7 +3409,7 @@ static int ocfs2_downconvert_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
> * we can recover correctly from node failure. Otherwise, we may get
> * invalid LVB in LKB, but without DLM_SBF_VALNOTVALID being set.
> */
> - if (!ocfs2_is_o2cb_active() &&
> + if (ocfs2_userspace_stack(osb) &&
> lockres->l_ops->flags & LOCK_TYPE_USES_LVB)
> lvb = 1;
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c
> index 8203590..52c07346b 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c
> @@ -48,12 +48,6 @@
> */
> static struct ocfs2_stack_plugin *active_stack;
>
> -inline int ocfs2_is_o2cb_active(void)
> -{
> - return !strcmp(active_stack->sp_name, OCFS2_STACK_PLUGIN_O2CB);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ocfs2_is_o2cb_active);
> -
> static struct ocfs2_stack_plugin *ocfs2_stack_lookup(const char *name)
> {
> struct ocfs2_stack_plugin *p;
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h b/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h
> index e3036e1..f2dce10 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/stackglue.h
> @@ -298,9 +298,6 @@ int ocfs2_plock(struct ocfs2_cluster_connection *conn, u64 ino,
> int ocfs2_stack_glue_register(struct ocfs2_stack_plugin *plugin);
> void ocfs2_stack_glue_unregister(struct ocfs2_stack_plugin *plugin);
>
> -/* In ocfs2_downconvert_lock(), we need to know which stack we are using */
> -int ocfs2_is_o2cb_active(void);
> -
> extern struct kset *ocfs2_kset;
>
> #endif /* STACKGLUE_H */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-22 1:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-22 8:17 [PATCH] ocfs2: get rid of ocfs2_is_o2cb_active function Gang He
2017-05-22 9:16 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joseph Qi
2017-06-22 1:23 ` Eric Ren
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®