From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: tony.luck@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
hpa@zytor.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
babu.moger@amd.com, fenghuay@nvidia.com,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 5/6] fs/resctrl: Do not invoke smp_processor_id() in preemptible context
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 17:28:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56b3dc7b06861029b1555d7f638a6ea22281fe6a.1779872016.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1779872016.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com>
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
__l3_mon_event_count() and __l3_mon_event_count_sum() call
smp_processor_id() to obtain the current CPU. However, some
monitor events can be read from any CPU in task context via
mon_event_count(); in that case the calling context is
preemptible and smp_processor_id() triggers a debug warning.
Fix this by skipping the current-CPU lookup when the event's
any_cpu flag is set, since such events do not need to run on a
specific CPU.
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
---
fs/resctrl/monitor.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/resctrl/monitor.c b/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
index 9fd901c78dc6..371ccae04892 100644
--- a/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
+++ b/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
@@ -417,9 +417,33 @@ static void mbm_cntr_free(struct rdt_l3_mon_domain *d, int cntr_id)
memset(&d->cntr_cfg[cntr_id], 0, sizeof(*d->cntr_cfg));
}
+/*
+ * Called from preemptible context via a direct call of mon_event_count() for
+ * events that can be read on any CPU.
+ * Called from preemptible but non-migratable process context (mon_event_count()
+ * via smp_call_on_cpu()) OR non-preemptible context (mon_event_count() via
+ * smp_call_function_any()) for events that need to be read on a specific CPU.
+ */
+static bool cpu_on_correct_domain(struct rmid_read *rr)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ /* Any CPU is OK for this event */
+ if (rr->evt->any_cpu)
+ return true;
+
+ cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+ /* Single domain. Must be on a CPU in that domain. */
+ if (rr->hdr)
+ return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &rr->hdr->cpu_mask);
+
+ /* Summing domains that share a cache, must be on a CPU for that cache. */
+ return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &rr->ci->shared_cpu_map);
+}
+
static int __l3_mon_event_count(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, struct rmid_read *rr)
{
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
u32 closid = rdtgrp->closid;
u32 rmid = rdtgrp->mon.rmid;
struct rdt_l3_mon_domain *d;
@@ -452,9 +476,6 @@ static int __l3_mon_event_count(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, struct rmid_read *rr)
return 0;
}
- /* Reading a single domain, must be on a CPU in that domain. */
- if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &d->hdr.cpu_mask))
- return -EINVAL;
if (rr->is_mbm_cntr)
rr->err = resctrl_arch_cntr_read(rr->r, d, closid, rmid, cntr_id,
rr->evt->evtid, &tval);
@@ -472,7 +493,6 @@ static int __l3_mon_event_count(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, struct rmid_read *rr)
static int __l3_mon_event_count_sum(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, struct rmid_read *rr)
{
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
u32 closid = rdtgrp->closid;
u32 rmid = rdtgrp->mon.rmid;
struct rdt_l3_mon_domain *d;
@@ -490,10 +510,6 @@ static int __l3_mon_event_count_sum(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, struct rmid_read *r
return -EINVAL;
}
- /* Summing domains that share a cache, must be on a CPU for that cache. */
- if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &rr->ci->shared_cpu_map))
- return -EINVAL;
-
/*
* Legacy files must report the sum of an event across all
* domains that share the same L3 cache instance.
@@ -524,7 +540,9 @@ static int __mon_event_count(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, struct rmid_read *rr)
{
switch (rr->r->rid) {
case RDT_RESOURCE_L3:
- WARN_ON_ONCE(rr->evt->any_cpu);
+ if (!cpu_on_correct_domain(rr))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (rr->hdr)
return __l3_mon_event_count(rdtgrp, rr);
else
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-27 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-27 9:25 [RFC PATCH 0/6] x86/resctrl: Introduce MMIO-based CMT access for Enhanced RDT Chen Yu
2026-05-27 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] x86/resctrl: Parse ACPI ERDT table and map RMDD domains by L3 cache ID Chen Yu
2026-05-28 20:21 ` Luck, Tony
2026-05-29 2:16 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-27 9:27 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] x86/resctrl: Parse ACPI CMRC table Chen Yu
2026-05-27 9:27 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] x86/resctrl: Rename prev_msr to prev_mon_val Chen Yu
2026-05-27 9:27 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] x86/resctrl: Refactor the monitor read function Chen Yu
2026-05-27 9:28 ` Chen Yu [this message]
2026-05-27 9:28 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] x86/resctrl: Add support for L3 occupancy monitoring via RMID MMIO read Chen Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56b3dc7b06861029b1555d7f638a6ea22281fe6a.1779872016.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®