From: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
To: Bhavin Sharma <bhavin.sharma@siliconsignals.io>,
alexander.deucher@amd.com
Cc: tarang.raval@siliconsignals.io,
"Chaitanya Dhere" <chaitanya.dhere@amd.com>,
"Jun Lei" <jun.lei@amd.com>,
"Harry Wentland" <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
"Leo Li" <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
"Rodrigo Siqueira" <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Xinhui Pan" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Kenneth Feng" <kenneth.feng@amd.com>,
"Wenjing Liu" <wenjing.liu@amd.com>,
"Roman Li" <roman.li@amd.com>, "Leo Ma" <hanghong.ma@amd.com>,
"Jose Fernandez" <josef@netflix.com>,
"Aurabindo Pillai" <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>,
"Ilya Bakoulin" <ilya.bakoulin@amd.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/display: Remove redundant check
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 09:58:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <578485e4-8983-412a-a214-921c450a225a@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241111120900.63869-2-bhavin.sharma@siliconsignals.io>
On 11/11/24 05:08, Bhavin Sharma wrote:
> The mode_422 variable is initialized to zero, making mode_422 ? 2 : 1
> always false.
>
> Since is_dsc_possible is already checked just above, there's no need to
> check it again before filling out the DSC settings.
>
> Removing this redundant check simplifies the code without affecting
> functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhavin Sharma <bhavin.sharma@siliconsignals.io>
> ---
> .../amd/display/dc/dml/dml1_display_rq_dlg_calc.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c | 13 +++++--------
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dml1_display_rq_dlg_calc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dml1_display_rq_dlg_calc.c
> index d8bfc85e5dcd..705ddabb5024 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dml1_display_rq_dlg_calc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dml1_display_rq_dlg_calc.c
> @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static void get_surf_rq_param(
> unsigned int vp_height = 0;
> unsigned int data_pitch = 0;
> unsigned int meta_pitch = 0;
> - unsigned int ppe = mode_422 ? 2 : 1;
> + unsigned int ppe = 1;
> bool surf_linear;
> bool surf_vert;
> unsigned int bytes_per_element;
This is fixed in amd-staging-drm-next by the following commit and it's
no longer needed.
ec680fdbb29a drm/amd/display: Remove always-false branches
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c
> index ebd5df1a36e8..85f6f8e43947 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c
> @@ -1093,14 +1093,11 @@ static bool setup_dsc_config(
> if (!is_dsc_possible)
> goto done;
>
> - // Final decission: can we do DSC or not?
> - if (is_dsc_possible) {
> - // Fill out the rest of DSC settings
> - dsc_cfg->block_pred_enable = dsc_common_caps.is_block_pred_supported;
> - dsc_cfg->linebuf_depth = dsc_common_caps.lb_bit_depth;
> - dsc_cfg->version_minor = (dsc_common_caps.dsc_version & 0xf0) >> 4;
> - dsc_cfg->is_dp = dsc_sink_caps->is_dp;
> - }
> + // Fill out the rest of DSC settings
> + dsc_cfg->block_pred_enable = dsc_common_caps.is_block_pred_supported;
> + dsc_cfg->linebuf_depth = dsc_common_caps.lb_bit_depth;
> + dsc_cfg->version_minor = (dsc_common_caps.dsc_version & 0xf0) >> 4;
> + dsc_cfg->is_dp = dsc_sink_caps->is_dp;
>
> done:
> if (!is_dsc_possible)
This looks to me. Please revise and include this part in V2. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-13 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-11 12:08 [PATCH 0/2] Remove redundant condition check Bhavin Sharma
2024-11-11 12:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/display: Remove redundant check Bhavin Sharma
2024-11-13 16:58 ` Alex Hung [this message]
2024-11-11 12:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/amd/pm: " Bhavin Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=578485e4-8983-412a-a214-921c450a225a@amd.com \
--to=alex.hung@amd.com \
--cc=Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com \
--cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=aurabindo.pillai@amd.com \
--cc=bhavin.sharma@siliconsignals.io \
--cc=chaitanya.dhere@amd.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hanghong.ma@amd.com \
--cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
--cc=ilya.bakoulin@amd.com \
--cc=josef@netflix.com \
--cc=jun.lei@amd.com \
--cc=kenneth.feng@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roman.li@amd.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=sunpeng.li@amd.com \
--cc=tarang.raval@siliconsignals.io \
--cc=wenjing.liu@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®