From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Allow userspace to define the microcode version
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 07:09:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <588983c3-4ceb-071e-260b-869613655951@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180424031400.GA22608@char.us.oracle.com>
On 24/04/2018 05:14, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> You would need to include the microcode version in the migration stream.
>
> But this brings another point - what if we want to manifest certain
> new CPUID bits?
You don't do that across migration. Generally if you want to do live
migration and you set up the guest to know everything about the host
(down to the microcode level), you should make sure your host are pretty
much identical.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-24 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-26 7:23 Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 9:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 10:06 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 10:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 11:02 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 11:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 11:25 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 11:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 11:37 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 11:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 11:52 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 11:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 12:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 12:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 12:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 12:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 13:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 14:39 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-26 14:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 19:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 20:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-26 21:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-27 8:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-03-08 9:24 ` [tip:x86/pti] x86/spectre_v2: Don't check microcode versions when running under hypervisors tip-bot for Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-04-17 10:40 ` [PATCH] KVM: X86: Allow userspace to define the microcode version Wanpeng Li
2018-04-17 20:24 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-04-18 3:24 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-04-18 9:03 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-04-18 10:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-23 12:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-23 13:08 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-04-23 13:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-23 16:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-24 2:59 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-04-24 3:14 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-04-24 5:09 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2018-04-24 13:44 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-04-24 2:56 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 11:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 12:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 9:26 Liran Alon
2018-02-26 10:08 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=588983c3-4ceb-071e-260b-869613655951@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®