mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, xlpang@redhat.com
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
	Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
	Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Keep quiet in case of broadcasted mce after system panic
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:53:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58A65791.4090600@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170216122215.uvrckt25g2msfxhe@pd.tnic>

On 02/16/2017 at 08:22 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 07:52:09PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
>>     then mce will be broadcast to the other cpus which are still running
>>     in the first kernel(i.e. looping in crash_nmi_callback).
> Simple: the crash code should really mark CPUs as not being online:
>
> void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
>
> 	...
>
>         /* If this CPU is offline, just bail out. */
>         if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())) {
>                 u64 mcgstatus;
>
>                 mcgstatus = mce_rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS);
>                 if (mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV) {
>                         mce_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS, 0);
>                         return;
>                 }
>         }
>
> because looping in crash_nmi_callback() does not really denote them as
> CPUs being online.
>
> And just so that you don't disturb the machine too much during crashing,
> you could simply clear them from the online masks, i.e., perhaps call
> remove_cpu_from_maps() with the proper locking around it instead of
> doing a full cpu_down().

It changes the value of cpu_online_mask/etc which will cause confusion to vmcore analysis.
Moreover, for the code(see comment inlined)

        if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())) {
                u64 mcgstatus;

                mcgstatus = mce_rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS);
                if (mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV) { // This condition may be not true, the mce triggered on kdump cpu 
                                                                     // doesn't need to have this bit set for the other cpus remain in 1st kernel. 
                        mce_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS, 0);
                        return;
                }
        }


Regards,
Xunlei

>
> The machine will be killed anyway after kdump is done writing out
> memory.
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-17  1:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-23  8:01 Xunlei Pang
2017-01-23 12:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-23 13:35   ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-23 14:50     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-23 17:40       ` Luck, Tony
2017-01-23 17:51         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-23 18:01           ` Luck, Tony
2017-01-23 18:14             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-24  2:33               ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-24  1:46           ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-24  1:51             ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-24  1:27       ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-24 12:22         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-26  6:30           ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-26  6:44             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-16  5:36               ` Xunlei Pang
2017-02-16 10:18                 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-16 11:52                   ` Xunlei Pang
2017-02-16 12:22                     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-17  1:53                       ` Xunlei Pang [this message]
2017-02-17  9:07                         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-17 16:21                           ` Xunlei Pang
2017-02-21 18:20                             ` Luck, Tony
2017-02-22  5:50                               ` Xunlei Pang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58A65791.4090600@redhat.com \
    --to=xpang@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome