From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
mst@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/8] ptr_ring: introduce batch dequeuing
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:16:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <590abb0f-e28a-52f7-5abc-b72159e31d5f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ecd2a27-4f93-2b3f-cb91-c558976973a2@cogentembedded.com>
On 2017年03月21日 18:25, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 3/21/2017 7:04 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/ptr_ring.h | 65
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
>> index 6c70444..4771ded 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
>> @@ -247,6 +247,22 @@ static inline void *__ptr_ring_consume(struct
>> ptr_ring *r)
>> return ptr;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline int __ptr_ring_consume_batched(struct ptr_ring *r,
>> + void **array, int n)
>> +{
>> + void *ptr;
>> + int i = 0;
>> +
>> + while (i < n) {
>
> Hm, why not *for*?
Yes, it maybe better, if there's other comment on the series, will
change it in next version.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-21 4:04 [PATCH net-next 0/8] vhost-net rx batching Jason Wang
2017-03-21 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] ptr_ring: introduce batch dequeuing Jason Wang
2017-03-21 10:25 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2017-03-22 3:16 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2017-03-22 13:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-23 5:33 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-21 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] skb_array: " Jason Wang
2017-03-21 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] tun: export skb_array Jason Wang
2017-03-21 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] tap: " Jason Wang
2017-03-21 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] tun: support receiving skb through msg_control Jason Wang
2017-03-21 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] tap: support receiving skb from msg_control Jason Wang
2017-03-21 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] vhost_net: try batch dequing from skb array Jason Wang
2017-03-22 14:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-23 5:34 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-29 9:58 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-29 10:46 ` Pankaj Gupta
2017-03-29 10:53 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-29 21:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-21 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] vhost_net: use lockless peeking for skb array during busy polling Jason Wang
2017-03-29 12:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-30 2:16 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-30 2:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-30 3:53 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=590abb0f-e28a-52f7-5abc-b72159e31d5f@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome