* [PATCH v11] drm: Unplug drm device when unregistering it (v8) @ 2017-04-13 7:32 Jeffy Chen 2017-04-14 15:15 ` Sean Paul 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jeffy Chen @ 2017-04-13 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Cc: briannorris, dianders, tfiga, seanpaul, zyw, marcheu, mark.yao, hshi, Jeffy Chen, Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, dri-devel, Chris Wilson, David Airlie, Tom Gundersen, Patrik Jakobsson, Dave Airlie After unbinding drm, the user space may still owns the drm dev fd, and may still be able to call drm ioctl. We're using an unplugged state to prevent something like that, so let's reuse it here. Also drop drm_unplug_dev, because it would be unused after other changes. Verified on rk3399 chromebook kevin(with cros 4.4 kernel), no more crashes when unbinding drm with ui service still running. v2: Fix some commit messages. v3: Reuse unplug status. v4: Add drm_device_set_plug_state helper. v5: Fix hang when unregistering drm dev with open_count 0. v6: Move drm_device_set_plug_state into drm_drv. v7: Add missing drm_dev_unref in udl_drv. v8: Fix compiler errors after enable udl. Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 26 ++++++++++---------------- drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c | 3 ++- include/drm/drmP.h | 6 ------ include/drm/drm_drv.h | 1 - 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c index b5c6bb4..e1da4d1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c @@ -355,22 +355,6 @@ void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_put_dev); -void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev) -{ - /* for a USB device */ - drm_dev_unregister(dev); - - mutex_lock(&drm_global_mutex); - - drm_device_set_unplugged(dev); - - if (dev->open_count == 0) { - drm_put_dev(dev); - } - mutex_unlock(&drm_global_mutex); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_unplug_dev); - /* * DRM internal mount * We want to be able to allocate our own "struct address_space" to control @@ -733,6 +717,13 @@ static void remove_compat_control_link(struct drm_device *dev) kfree(name); } +static inline void drm_device_set_plug_state(struct drm_device *dev, + bool plugged) +{ + smp_wmb(); + atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, !plugged); +} + /** * drm_dev_register - Register DRM device * @dev: Device to register @@ -787,6 +778,8 @@ int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags) if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) drm_modeset_register_all(dev); + drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, true); + ret = 0; DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n", @@ -826,6 +819,7 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev) drm_lastclose(dev); dev->registered = false; + drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, false); if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) drm_modeset_unregister_all(dev); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c index cd8b017..fc73e24 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c @@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ static void udl_usb_disconnect(struct usb_interface *interface) drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(dev); udl_fbdev_unplug(dev); udl_drop_usb(dev); - drm_unplug_dev(dev); + drm_dev_unregister(dev); + drm_dev_unref(dev); } /* diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h index 3bfafcd..980a204 100644 --- a/include/drm/drmP.h +++ b/include/drm/drmP.h @@ -488,12 +488,6 @@ static __inline__ int drm_core_check_feature(struct drm_device *dev, return ((dev->driver->driver_features & feature) ? 1 : 0); } -static inline void drm_device_set_unplugged(struct drm_device *dev) -{ - smp_wmb(); - atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, 1); -} - static inline int drm_device_is_unplugged(struct drm_device *dev) { int ret = atomic_read(&dev->unplugged); diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h index 0fefc3f..eb63078 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h @@ -544,7 +544,6 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev); void drm_dev_ref(struct drm_device *dev); void drm_dev_unref(struct drm_device *dev); void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev); -void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev); int drm_dev_set_unique(struct drm_device *dev, const char *name); -- 2.1.4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11] drm: Unplug drm device when unregistering it (v8) 2017-04-13 7:32 [PATCH v11] drm: Unplug drm device when unregistering it (v8) Jeffy Chen @ 2017-04-14 15:15 ` Sean Paul 2017-05-29 20:25 ` Chris Wilson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Sean Paul @ 2017-04-14 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeffy Chen Cc: linux-kernel, briannorris, dianders, tfiga, seanpaul, zyw, marcheu, mark.yao, hshi, Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, dri-devel, Chris Wilson, David Airlie, Tom Gundersen, Patrik Jakobsson, Dave Airlie On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 03:32:44PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote: > After unbinding drm, the user space may still owns the drm dev fd, and > may still be able to call drm ioctl. > > We're using an unplugged state to prevent something like that, so let's > reuse it here. > > Also drop drm_unplug_dev, because it would be unused after other changes. > > Verified on rk3399 chromebook kevin(with cros 4.4 kernel), no more crashes > when unbinding drm with ui service still running. > > v2: Fix some commit messages. > v3: Reuse unplug status. > v4: Add drm_device_set_plug_state helper. > v5: Fix hang when unregistering drm dev with open_count 0. > v6: Move drm_device_set_plug_state into drm_drv. > v7: Add missing drm_dev_unref in udl_drv. > v8: Fix compiler errors after enable udl. > > Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> > > --- Hi Jeffy, Given the trouble we've had with this patch already, coupled with the fact that unbinding while userspace is active is a contrived/pathological case, I don't think it's worth picking this patch upstream. If it's really causing issues downstream, you can add my Reviewed-by for a CHROMIUM patch, but I'd rather not carry patches in the CrOS repo if we don't need to. Sean > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 26 ++++++++++---------------- > drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c | 3 ++- > include/drm/drmP.h | 6 ------ > include/drm/drm_drv.h | 1 - > 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > index b5c6bb4..e1da4d1 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > @@ -355,22 +355,6 @@ void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_put_dev); > > -void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev) > -{ > - /* for a USB device */ > - drm_dev_unregister(dev); > - > - mutex_lock(&drm_global_mutex); > - > - drm_device_set_unplugged(dev); > - > - if (dev->open_count == 0) { > - drm_put_dev(dev); > - } > - mutex_unlock(&drm_global_mutex); > -} > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_unplug_dev); > - > /* > * DRM internal mount > * We want to be able to allocate our own "struct address_space" to control > @@ -733,6 +717,13 @@ static void remove_compat_control_link(struct drm_device *dev) > kfree(name); > } > > +static inline void drm_device_set_plug_state(struct drm_device *dev, > + bool plugged) > +{ > + smp_wmb(); > + atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, !plugged); > +} > + > /** > * drm_dev_register - Register DRM device > * @dev: Device to register > @@ -787,6 +778,8 @@ int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags) > if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) > drm_modeset_register_all(dev); > > + drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, true); > + > ret = 0; > > DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n", > @@ -826,6 +819,7 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev) > drm_lastclose(dev); > > dev->registered = false; > + drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, false); > > if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) > drm_modeset_unregister_all(dev); > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c > index cd8b017..fc73e24 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c > @@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ static void udl_usb_disconnect(struct usb_interface *interface) > drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(dev); > udl_fbdev_unplug(dev); > udl_drop_usb(dev); > - drm_unplug_dev(dev); > + drm_dev_unregister(dev); > + drm_dev_unref(dev); > } > > /* > diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h > index 3bfafcd..980a204 100644 > --- a/include/drm/drmP.h > +++ b/include/drm/drmP.h > @@ -488,12 +488,6 @@ static __inline__ int drm_core_check_feature(struct drm_device *dev, > return ((dev->driver->driver_features & feature) ? 1 : 0); > } > > -static inline void drm_device_set_unplugged(struct drm_device *dev) > -{ > - smp_wmb(); > - atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, 1); > -} > - > static inline int drm_device_is_unplugged(struct drm_device *dev) > { > int ret = atomic_read(&dev->unplugged); > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h > index 0fefc3f..eb63078 100644 > --- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h > +++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h > @@ -544,7 +544,6 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev); > void drm_dev_ref(struct drm_device *dev); > void drm_dev_unref(struct drm_device *dev); > void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev); > -void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev); > > int drm_dev_set_unique(struct drm_device *dev, const char *name); > > -- > 2.1.4 > -- Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11] drm: Unplug drm device when unregistering it (v8) 2017-04-14 15:15 ` Sean Paul @ 2017-05-29 20:25 ` Chris Wilson 2017-05-29 21:18 ` Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita 2017-05-30 7:06 ` Hans de Goede 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-05-29 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sean Paul Cc: Jeffy Chen, linux-kernel, briannorris, dianders, tfiga, zyw, marcheu, mark.yao, hshi, Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, dri-devel, David Airlie, Tom Gundersen, Hans de Goede, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita, Patrik Jakobsson, Dave Airlie On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:15:04AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 03:32:44PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote: > > After unbinding drm, the user space may still owns the drm dev fd, and > > may still be able to call drm ioctl. > > > > We're using an unplugged state to prevent something like that, so let's > > reuse it here. > > > > Also drop drm_unplug_dev, because it would be unused after other changes. > > > > Verified on rk3399 chromebook kevin(with cros 4.4 kernel), no more crashes > > when unbinding drm with ui service still running. > > > > v2: Fix some commit messages. > > v3: Reuse unplug status. > > v4: Add drm_device_set_plug_state helper. > > v5: Fix hang when unregistering drm dev with open_count 0. > > v6: Move drm_device_set_plug_state into drm_drv. > > v7: Add missing drm_dev_unref in udl_drv. > > v8: Fix compiler errors after enable udl. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> > > > > --- > > Hi Jeffy, > Given the trouble we've had with this patch already, coupled with the fact that > unbinding while userspace is active is a contrived/pathological case, I don't > think it's worth picking this patch upstream. > > If it's really causing issues downstream, you can add my Reviewed-by for a CHROMIUM > patch, but I'd rather not carry patches in the CrOS repo if we don't need to. Would a Fixes: a39be606f99d ("drm: Do a full device unregister when unplugging") Reported-by: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita <marcodiegomesquita@gmail.com> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> convince us to look into this patch again? -Chris > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 26 ++++++++++---------------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c | 3 ++- > > include/drm/drmP.h | 6 ------ > > include/drm/drm_drv.h | 1 - > > 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > > index b5c6bb4..e1da4d1 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > > @@ -355,22 +355,6 @@ void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev) > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_put_dev); > > > > -void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev) > > -{ > > - /* for a USB device */ > > - drm_dev_unregister(dev); > > - > > - mutex_lock(&drm_global_mutex); > > - > > - drm_device_set_unplugged(dev); > > - > > - if (dev->open_count == 0) { > > - drm_put_dev(dev); > > - } > > - mutex_unlock(&drm_global_mutex); > > -} > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_unplug_dev); > > - > > /* > > * DRM internal mount > > * We want to be able to allocate our own "struct address_space" to control > > @@ -733,6 +717,13 @@ static void remove_compat_control_link(struct drm_device *dev) > > kfree(name); > > } > > > > +static inline void drm_device_set_plug_state(struct drm_device *dev, > > + bool plugged) > > +{ > > + smp_wmb(); > > + atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, !plugged); > > +} > > + > > /** > > * drm_dev_register - Register DRM device > > * @dev: Device to register > > @@ -787,6 +778,8 @@ int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags) > > if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) > > drm_modeset_register_all(dev); > > > > + drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, true); > > + > > ret = 0; > > > > DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n", > > @@ -826,6 +819,7 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev) > > drm_lastclose(dev); > > > > dev->registered = false; > > + drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, false); > > > > if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) > > drm_modeset_unregister_all(dev); > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c > > index cd8b017..fc73e24 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c > > @@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ static void udl_usb_disconnect(struct usb_interface *interface) > > drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(dev); > > udl_fbdev_unplug(dev); > > udl_drop_usb(dev); > > - drm_unplug_dev(dev); > > + drm_dev_unregister(dev); > > + drm_dev_unref(dev); > > } > > > > /* > > diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h > > index 3bfafcd..980a204 100644 > > --- a/include/drm/drmP.h > > +++ b/include/drm/drmP.h > > @@ -488,12 +488,6 @@ static __inline__ int drm_core_check_feature(struct drm_device *dev, > > return ((dev->driver->driver_features & feature) ? 1 : 0); > > } > > > > -static inline void drm_device_set_unplugged(struct drm_device *dev) > > -{ > > - smp_wmb(); > > - atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, 1); > > -} > > - > > static inline int drm_device_is_unplugged(struct drm_device *dev) > > { > > int ret = atomic_read(&dev->unplugged); > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h > > index 0fefc3f..eb63078 100644 > > --- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h > > +++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h > > @@ -544,7 +544,6 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev); > > void drm_dev_ref(struct drm_device *dev); > > void drm_dev_unref(struct drm_device *dev); > > void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev); > > -void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev); > > > > int drm_dev_set_unique(struct drm_device *dev, const char *name); -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11] drm: Unplug drm device when unregistering it (v8) 2017-05-29 20:25 ` Chris Wilson @ 2017-05-29 21:18 ` Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita 2017-05-30 7:06 ` Hans de Goede 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita @ 2017-05-29 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wilson, Sean Paul, Jeffy Chen, linux-kernel, briannorris, dianders, tfiga, zyw, marcheu, mark.yao, hshi, Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, dri-devel, David Airlie, Tom Gundersen, Hans de Goede, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita, Patrik Jakobsson, Dave Airlie On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > convince us to look into this patch again? > -Chris > >> > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 26 ++++++++++---------------- >> > drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c | 3 ++- >> > include/drm/drmP.h | 6 ------ >> > include/drm/drm_drv.h | 1 - >> > 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >> > index b5c6bb4..e1da4d1 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >> > @@ -355,22 +355,6 @@ void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev) >> > } >> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_put_dev); >> > >> > -void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev) >> > -{ >> > - /* for a USB device */ >> > - drm_dev_unregister(dev); >> > - >> > - mutex_lock(&drm_global_mutex); >> > - >> > - drm_device_set_unplugged(dev); >> > - >> > - if (dev->open_count == 0) { >> > - drm_put_dev(dev); >> > - } >> > - mutex_unlock(&drm_global_mutex); >> > -} >> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_unplug_dev); >> > - >> > /* >> > * DRM internal mount >> > * We want to be able to allocate our own "struct address_space" to control >> > @@ -733,6 +717,13 @@ static void remove_compat_control_link(struct drm_device *dev) >> > kfree(name); >> > } >> > >> > +static inline void drm_device_set_plug_state(struct drm_device *dev, >> > + bool plugged) >> > +{ >> > + smp_wmb(); >> > + atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, !plugged); >> > +} >> > + >> > /** >> > * drm_dev_register - Register DRM device >> > * @dev: Device to register >> > @@ -787,6 +778,8 @@ int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags) >> > if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) >> > drm_modeset_register_all(dev); >> > >> > + drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, true); >> > + >> > ret = 0; >> > >> > DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n", >> > @@ -826,6 +819,7 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev) >> > drm_lastclose(dev); >> > >> > dev->registered = false; >> > + drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, false); >> > >> > if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) >> > drm_modeset_unregister_all(dev); >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >> > index cd8b017..fc73e24 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >> > @@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ static void udl_usb_disconnect(struct usb_interface *interface) >> > drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(dev); >> > udl_fbdev_unplug(dev); >> > udl_drop_usb(dev); >> > - drm_unplug_dev(dev); >> > + drm_dev_unregister(dev); >> > + drm_dev_unref(dev); >> > } >> > >> > /* >> > diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h >> > index 3bfafcd..980a204 100644 >> > --- a/include/drm/drmP.h >> > +++ b/include/drm/drmP.h >> > @@ -488,12 +488,6 @@ static __inline__ int drm_core_check_feature(struct drm_device *dev, >> > return ((dev->driver->driver_features & feature) ? 1 : 0); >> > } >> > >> > -static inline void drm_device_set_unplugged(struct drm_device *dev) >> > -{ >> > - smp_wmb(); >> > - atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, 1); >> > -} >> > - >> > static inline int drm_device_is_unplugged(struct drm_device *dev) >> > { >> > int ret = atomic_read(&dev->unplugged); >> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h >> > index 0fefc3f..eb63078 100644 >> > --- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h >> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h >> > @@ -544,7 +544,6 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev); >> > void drm_dev_ref(struct drm_device *dev); >> > void drm_dev_unref(struct drm_device *dev); >> > void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev); >> > -void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev); >> > >> > int drm_dev_set_unique(struct drm_device *dev, const char *name); > I have no experience writing drivers. So, feel free to disregard my suggestion if it does not makes sense. I'm trying to update a driver for a USB device and Hans is helping me with it. I had some problems when plugging and unplugging the device and ended finding Jeffy's patch. I made the same changes to the driver I was working on and it behaved a bit better. When I told Hans about it, he found the problem with the calls in drm_release. I'm not sure what is the best way to fix/improve the situation but, wouldn't it be a good idea to guard dangerous calls like unregister or unplug so that there are no side effects if they are called more times then they should? I mean, if a driver does so, it is already broken, but I think that keeping the kernel safe is a better choice, no? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11] drm: Unplug drm device when unregistering it (v8) 2017-05-29 20:25 ` Chris Wilson 2017-05-29 21:18 ` Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita @ 2017-05-30 7:06 ` Hans de Goede 2017-05-31 2:39 ` jeffy 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Hans de Goede @ 2017-05-30 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wilson, Sean Paul, Jeffy Chen, linux-kernel, briannorris, dianders, tfiga, zyw, marcheu, mark.yao, hshi, Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, dri-devel, David Airlie, Tom Gundersen, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita, Patrik Jakobsson, Dave Airlie Hi, On 29-05-17 22:25, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:15:04AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 03:32:44PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote: >>> After unbinding drm, the user space may still owns the drm dev fd, and >>> may still be able to call drm ioctl. >>> >>> We're using an unplugged state to prevent something like that, so let's >>> reuse it here. >>> >>> Also drop drm_unplug_dev, because it would be unused after other changes. >>> >>> Verified on rk3399 chromebook kevin(with cros 4.4 kernel), no more crashes >>> when unbinding drm with ui service still running. >>> >>> v2: Fix some commit messages. >>> v3: Reuse unplug status. >>> v4: Add drm_device_set_plug_state helper. >>> v5: Fix hang when unregistering drm dev with open_count 0. >>> v6: Move drm_device_set_plug_state into drm_drv. >>> v7: Add missing drm_dev_unref in udl_drv. >>> v8: Fix compiler errors after enable udl. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> >>> >>> --- >> >> Hi Jeffy, >> Given the trouble we've had with this patch already, coupled with the fact that >> unbinding while userspace is active is a contrived/pathological case, I don't >> think it's worth picking this patch upstream. >> >> If it's really causing issues downstream, you can add my Reviewed-by for a CHROMIUM >> patch, but I'd rather not carry patches in the CrOS repo if we don't need to. > > Would a > > Fixes: a39be606f99d ("drm: Do a full device unregister when unplugging") > Reported-by: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita <marcodiegomesquita@gmail.com> > Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> > > convince us to look into this patch again? The problem is this patch is wrong, see below. >>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 26 ++++++++++---------------- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c | 3 ++- >>> include/drm/drmP.h | 6 ------ >>> include/drm/drm_drv.h | 1 - >>> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >>> index b5c6bb4..e1da4d1 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >>> @@ -355,22 +355,6 @@ void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev) >>> } >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_put_dev); >>> >>> -void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev) >>> -{ >>> - /* for a USB device */ >>> - drm_dev_unregister(dev); >>> - >>> - mutex_lock(&drm_global_mutex); >>> - >>> - drm_device_set_unplugged(dev); >>> - >>> - if (dev->open_count == 0) { >>> - drm_put_dev(dev); >>> - } >>> - mutex_unlock(&drm_global_mutex); >>> -} >>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_unplug_dev); >>> - >>> /* >>> * DRM internal mount >>> * We want to be able to allocate our own "struct address_space" to control >>> @@ -733,6 +717,13 @@ static void remove_compat_control_link(struct drm_device *dev) >>> kfree(name); >>> } >>> >>> +static inline void drm_device_set_plug_state(struct drm_device *dev, >>> + bool plugged) >>> +{ >>> + smp_wmb(); >>> + atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, !plugged); >>> +} >>> + >>> /** >>> * drm_dev_register - Register DRM device >>> * @dev: Device to register >>> @@ -787,6 +778,8 @@ int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags) >>> if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) >>> drm_modeset_register_all(dev); >>> >>> + drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, true); >>> + >>> ret = 0; >>> >>> DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n", >>> @@ -826,6 +819,7 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev) >>> drm_lastclose(dev); >>> >>> dev->registered = false; >>> + drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, false); >>> >>> if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) >>> drm_modeset_unregister_all(dev); >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>> index cd8b017..fc73e24 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>> @@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ static void udl_usb_disconnect(struct usb_interface *interface) >>> drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(dev); >>> udl_fbdev_unplug(dev); >>> udl_drop_usb(dev); >>> - drm_unplug_dev(dev); >>> + drm_dev_unregister(dev); >>> + drm_dev_unref(dev); The unref here will cause the device struct to get free-ed even if userspace still holds references to it through the drm_dev. To fix this we would need to call drm_dev_ref on a open from userspace and drm_dev_unref from drm_release. Regards, Hans >>> } >>> >>> /* >>> diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h >>> index 3bfafcd..980a204 100644 >>> --- a/include/drm/drmP.h >>> +++ b/include/drm/drmP.h >>> @@ -488,12 +488,6 @@ static __inline__ int drm_core_check_feature(struct drm_device *dev, >>> return ((dev->driver->driver_features & feature) ? 1 : 0); >>> } >>> >>> -static inline void drm_device_set_unplugged(struct drm_device *dev) >>> -{ >>> - smp_wmb(); >>> - atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, 1); >>> -} >>> - >>> static inline int drm_device_is_unplugged(struct drm_device *dev) >>> { >>> int ret = atomic_read(&dev->unplugged); >>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h >>> index 0fefc3f..eb63078 100644 >>> --- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h >>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h >>> @@ -544,7 +544,6 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev); >>> void drm_dev_ref(struct drm_device *dev); >>> void drm_dev_unref(struct drm_device *dev); >>> void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev); >>> -void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev); >>> >>> int drm_dev_set_unique(struct drm_device *dev, const char *name); > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11] drm: Unplug drm device when unregistering it (v8) 2017-05-30 7:06 ` Hans de Goede @ 2017-05-31 2:39 ` jeffy 2017-06-01 12:13 ` Hans de Goede 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: jeffy @ 2017-05-31 2:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hans de Goede, Chris Wilson, Sean Paul, linux-kernel, briannorris, dianders, tfiga, zyw, marcheu, mark.yao, hshi, Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, dri-devel, David Airlie, Tom Gundersen, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita, Patrik Jakobsson, Dave Airlie Hi Hans, thanx for investigating :) On 05/30/2017 03:06 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 29-05-17 22:25, Chris Wilson wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:15:04AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 03:32:44PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote: >>>> After unbinding drm, the user space may still owns the drm dev fd, and >>>> may still be able to call drm ioctl. >>>> >>>> We're using an unplugged state to prevent something like that, so let's >>>> reuse it here. >>>> >>>> Also drop drm_unplug_dev, because it would be unused after other >>>> changes. >>>> >>>> Verified on rk3399 chromebook kevin(with cros 4.4 kernel), no more >>>> crashes >>>> when unbinding drm with ui service still running. >>>> >>>> v2: Fix some commit messages. >>>> v3: Reuse unplug status. >>>> v4: Add drm_device_set_plug_state helper. >>>> v5: Fix hang when unregistering drm dev with open_count 0. >>>> v6: Move drm_device_set_plug_state into drm_drv. >>>> v7: Add missing drm_dev_unref in udl_drv. >>>> v8: Fix compiler errors after enable udl. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> >>>> >>>> --- >>> >>> Hi Jeffy, >>> Given the trouble we've had with this patch already, coupled with the >>> fact that >>> unbinding while userspace is active is a contrived/pathological case, >>> I don't >>> think it's worth picking this patch upstream. >>> >>> If it's really causing issues downstream, you can add my Reviewed-by >>> for a CHROMIUM >>> patch, but I'd rather not carry patches in the CrOS repo if we don't >>> need to. >> >> Would a >> >> Fixes: a39be606f99d ("drm: Do a full device unregister when unplugging") >> Reported-by: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita <marcodiegomesquita@gmail.com> >> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> >> >> convince us to look into this patch again? > > The problem is this patch is wrong, see below. > >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 26 ++++++++++---------------- >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c | 3 ++- >>>> include/drm/drmP.h | 6 ------ >>>> include/drm/drm_drv.h | 1 - >>>> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >>>> index b5c6bb4..e1da4d1 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >>>> @@ -355,22 +355,6 @@ void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev) >>>> } >>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_put_dev); >>>> -void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev) >>>> -{ >>>> - /* for a USB device */ >>>> - drm_dev_unregister(dev); >>>> - >>>> - mutex_lock(&drm_global_mutex); >>>> - >>>> - drm_device_set_unplugged(dev); >>>> - >>>> - if (dev->open_count == 0) { >>>> - drm_put_dev(dev); >>>> - } >>>> - mutex_unlock(&drm_global_mutex); >>>> -} >>>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_unplug_dev); >>>> - >>>> /* >>>> * DRM internal mount >>>> * We want to be able to allocate our own "struct address_space" >>>> to control >>>> @@ -733,6 +717,13 @@ static void remove_compat_control_link(struct >>>> drm_device *dev) >>>> kfree(name); >>>> } >>>> +static inline void drm_device_set_plug_state(struct drm_device *dev, >>>> + bool plugged) >>>> +{ >>>> + smp_wmb(); >>>> + atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, !plugged); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> /** >>>> * drm_dev_register - Register DRM device >>>> * @dev: Device to register >>>> @@ -787,6 +778,8 @@ int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, >>>> unsigned long flags) >>>> if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) >>>> drm_modeset_register_all(dev); >>>> + drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, true); >>>> + >>>> ret = 0; >>>> DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n", >>>> @@ -826,6 +819,7 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev) >>>> drm_lastclose(dev); >>>> dev->registered = false; >>>> + drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, false); >>>> if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) >>>> drm_modeset_unregister_all(dev); >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>>> index cd8b017..fc73e24 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>>> @@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ static void udl_usb_disconnect(struct >>>> usb_interface *interface) >>>> drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(dev); >>>> udl_fbdev_unplug(dev); >>>> udl_drop_usb(dev); >>>> - drm_unplug_dev(dev); >>>> + drm_dev_unregister(dev); >>>> + drm_dev_unref(dev); > > The unref here will cause the device struct to get free-ed even if > userspace still holds references to it through the drm_dev. To fix > this we would need to call drm_dev_ref on a open from userspace and > drm_dev_unref from drm_release. right, but i think we are already did the ref/unref in the open/release through drm_minor_acquire/drm_minor_release. i think the problem would be: 1/ we are trying to unregister&unref when disconnected 2/ the drm_release would try to unregister&unref(by calling drm_put_dev) when found it unplugged. and your patch "drm: Do not call drm_dev_unregister twice on drm_unplug_dev" looks like a good way to fix this(to me), maybe we can place this patch after yours, and check for open_count here? - drm_unplug_dev(dev); + if (dev->open_count == 0) + drm_dev_unref(dev); > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > >>>> } >>>> /* >>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h >>>> index 3bfafcd..980a204 100644 >>>> --- a/include/drm/drmP.h >>>> +++ b/include/drm/drmP.h >>>> @@ -488,12 +488,6 @@ static __inline__ int >>>> drm_core_check_feature(struct drm_device *dev, >>>> return ((dev->driver->driver_features & feature) ? 1 : 0); >>>> } >>>> -static inline void drm_device_set_unplugged(struct drm_device *dev) >>>> -{ >>>> - smp_wmb(); >>>> - atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, 1); >>>> -} >>>> - >>>> static inline int drm_device_is_unplugged(struct drm_device *dev) >>>> { >>>> int ret = atomic_read(&dev->unplugged); >>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h >>>> index 0fefc3f..eb63078 100644 >>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h >>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h >>>> @@ -544,7 +544,6 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev); >>>> void drm_dev_ref(struct drm_device *dev); >>>> void drm_dev_unref(struct drm_device *dev); >>>> void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev); >>>> -void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev); >>>> int drm_dev_set_unique(struct drm_device *dev, const char *name); >> > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11] drm: Unplug drm device when unregistering it (v8) 2017-05-31 2:39 ` jeffy @ 2017-06-01 12:13 ` Hans de Goede 2017-06-01 12:22 ` Chris Wilson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Hans de Goede @ 2017-06-01 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jeffy, Chris Wilson, Sean Paul, linux-kernel, briannorris, dianders, tfiga, zyw, marcheu, mark.yao, hshi, Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, dri-devel, David Airlie, Tom Gundersen, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita, Patrik Jakobsson, Dave Airlie Hi, On 31-05-17 04:39, jeffy wrote: > Hi Hans, > > thanx for investigating :) > > On 05/30/2017 03:06 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 29-05-17 22:25, Chris Wilson wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:15:04AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: >>>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 03:32:44PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote: >>>>> After unbinding drm, the user space may still owns the drm dev fd, and >>>>> may still be able to call drm ioctl. >>>>> >>>>> We're using an unplugged state to prevent something like that, so let's >>>>> reuse it here. >>>>> >>>>> Also drop drm_unplug_dev, because it would be unused after other >>>>> changes. >>>>> >>>>> Verified on rk3399 chromebook kevin(with cros 4.4 kernel), no more >>>>> crashes >>>>> when unbinding drm with ui service still running. >>>>> >>>>> v2: Fix some commit messages. >>>>> v3: Reuse unplug status. >>>>> v4: Add drm_device_set_plug_state helper. >>>>> v5: Fix hang when unregistering drm dev with open_count 0. >>>>> v6: Move drm_device_set_plug_state into drm_drv. >>>>> v7: Add missing drm_dev_unref in udl_drv. >>>>> v8: Fix compiler errors after enable udl. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>> >>>> Hi Jeffy, >>>> Given the trouble we've had with this patch already, coupled with the >>>> fact that >>>> unbinding while userspace is active is a contrived/pathological case, >>>> I don't >>>> think it's worth picking this patch upstream. >>>> >>>> If it's really causing issues downstream, you can add my Reviewed-by >>>> for a CHROMIUM >>>> patch, but I'd rather not carry patches in the CrOS repo if we don't >>>> need to. >>> >>> Would a >>> >>> Fixes: a39be606f99d ("drm: Do a full device unregister when unplugging") >>> Reported-by: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita <marcodiegomesquita@gmail.com> >>> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> >>> >>> convince us to look into this patch again? >> >> The problem is this patch is wrong, see below. >> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 26 ++++++++++---------------- >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c | 3 ++- >>>>> include/drm/drmP.h | 6 ------ >>>>> include/drm/drm_drv.h | 1 - >>>>> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >>>>> index b5c6bb4..e1da4d1 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >>>>> @@ -355,22 +355,6 @@ void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev) >>>>> } >>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_put_dev); >>>>> -void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev) >>>>> -{ >>>>> - /* for a USB device */ >>>>> - drm_dev_unregister(dev); >>>>> - >>>>> - mutex_lock(&drm_global_mutex); >>>>> - >>>>> - drm_device_set_unplugged(dev); >>>>> - >>>>> - if (dev->open_count == 0) { >>>>> - drm_put_dev(dev); >>>>> - } >>>>> - mutex_unlock(&drm_global_mutex); >>>>> -} >>>>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_unplug_dev); >>>>> - >>>>> /* >>>>> * DRM internal mount >>>>> * We want to be able to allocate our own "struct address_space" >>>>> to control >>>>> @@ -733,6 +717,13 @@ static void remove_compat_control_link(struct >>>>> drm_device *dev) >>>>> kfree(name); >>>>> } >>>>> +static inline void drm_device_set_plug_state(struct drm_device *dev, >>>>> + bool plugged) >>>>> +{ >>>>> + smp_wmb(); >>>>> + atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, !plugged); >>>>> +} >>>>> + >>>>> /** >>>>> * drm_dev_register - Register DRM device >>>>> * @dev: Device to register >>>>> @@ -787,6 +778,8 @@ int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, >>>>> unsigned long flags) >>>>> if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) >>>>> drm_modeset_register_all(dev); >>>>> + drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, true); >>>>> + >>>>> ret = 0; >>>>> DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n", >>>>> @@ -826,6 +819,7 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev) >>>>> drm_lastclose(dev); >>>>> dev->registered = false; >>>>> + drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, false); >>>>> if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) >>>>> drm_modeset_unregister_all(dev); >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>>>> index cd8b017..fc73e24 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>>>> @@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ static void udl_usb_disconnect(struct >>>>> usb_interface *interface) >>>>> drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(dev); >>>>> udl_fbdev_unplug(dev); >>>>> udl_drop_usb(dev); >>>>> - drm_unplug_dev(dev); >>>>> + drm_dev_unregister(dev); >>>>> + drm_dev_unref(dev); >> >> The unref here will cause the device struct to get free-ed even if >> userspace still holds references to it through the drm_dev. To fix >> this we would need to call drm_dev_ref on a open from userspace and >> drm_dev_unref from drm_release. > > right, but i think we are already did the ref/unref in the open/release through drm_minor_acquire/drm_minor_release. Ah yes, I see. Still calling drm_dev_unregister() directly from udl_usb_disconnect() is not going to work, see the patch titled "drm: Fix oops + Xserver hang when unplugging USB drm devices" The problem is that drm_dev_unregister() probably should be split into a drm_dev_unregister() and drm_dev_cleanup() function with the cleanup part getting called by the last unref, and at least calling drm_lastclose and the driver->unload call needs to be moved to the new drm_dev_cleanup. However splitting drm_dev_unregister() into drm_dev_unregister() and drm_dev_cleanup() is easier said then done because that would change the teardown order (e.g. calling driver->unload later) which may very well cause problems in various places and drivers. Regards, Hans >>>>> } >>>>> /* >>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h >>>>> index 3bfafcd..980a204 100644 >>>>> --- a/include/drm/drmP.h >>>>> +++ b/include/drm/drmP.h >>>>> @@ -488,12 +488,6 @@ static __inline__ int >>>>> drm_core_check_feature(struct drm_device *dev, >>>>> return ((dev->driver->driver_features & feature) ? 1 : 0); >>>>> } >>>>> -static inline void drm_device_set_unplugged(struct drm_device *dev) >>>>> -{ >>>>> - smp_wmb(); >>>>> - atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, 1); >>>>> -} >>>>> - >>>>> static inline int drm_device_is_unplugged(struct drm_device *dev) >>>>> { >>>>> int ret = atomic_read(&dev->unplugged); >>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h >>>>> index 0fefc3f..eb63078 100644 >>>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h >>>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h >>>>> @@ -544,7 +544,6 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev); >>>>> void drm_dev_ref(struct drm_device *dev); >>>>> void drm_dev_unref(struct drm_device *dev); >>>>> void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev); >>>>> -void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev); >>>>> int drm_dev_set_unique(struct drm_device *dev, const char *name); >>> >> >> >> > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11] drm: Unplug drm device when unregistering it (v8) 2017-06-01 12:13 ` Hans de Goede @ 2017-06-01 12:22 ` Chris Wilson 2017-06-01 12:26 ` Hans de Goede 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-06-01 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hans de Goede Cc: jeffy, Sean Paul, linux-kernel, briannorris, dianders, tfiga, zyw, marcheu, mark.yao, hshi, Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, dri-devel, David Airlie, Tom Gundersen, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita, Patrik Jakobsson, Dave Airlie On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:13:28PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 31-05-17 04:39, jeffy wrote: > >Hi Hans, > > > >thanx for investigating :) > > > >On 05/30/2017 03:06 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>On 29-05-17 22:25, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>>On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:15:04AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > >>>>On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 03:32:44PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote: > >>>>>After unbinding drm, the user space may still owns the drm dev fd, and > >>>>>may still be able to call drm ioctl. > >>>>> > >>>>>We're using an unplugged state to prevent something like that, so let's > >>>>>reuse it here. > >>>>> > >>>>>Also drop drm_unplug_dev, because it would be unused after other > >>>>>changes. > >>>>> > >>>>>Verified on rk3399 chromebook kevin(with cros 4.4 kernel), no more > >>>>>crashes > >>>>>when unbinding drm with ui service still running. > >>>>> > >>>>>v2: Fix some commit messages. > >>>>>v3: Reuse unplug status. > >>>>>v4: Add drm_device_set_plug_state helper. > >>>>>v5: Fix hang when unregistering drm dev with open_count 0. > >>>>>v6: Move drm_device_set_plug_state into drm_drv. > >>>>>v7: Add missing drm_dev_unref in udl_drv. > >>>>>v8: Fix compiler errors after enable udl. > >>>>> > >>>>>Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> > >>>>> > >>>>>--- > >>>> > >>>>Hi Jeffy, > >>>>Given the trouble we've had with this patch already, coupled with the > >>>>fact that > >>>>unbinding while userspace is active is a contrived/pathological case, > >>>>I don't > >>>>think it's worth picking this patch upstream. > >>>> > >>>>If it's really causing issues downstream, you can add my Reviewed-by > >>>>for a CHROMIUM > >>>>patch, but I'd rather not carry patches in the CrOS repo if we don't > >>>>need to. > >>> > >>>Would a > >>> > >>>Fixes: a39be606f99d ("drm: Do a full device unregister when unplugging") > >>>Reported-by: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita <marcodiegomesquita@gmail.com> > >>>Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> > >>> > >>>convince us to look into this patch again? > >> > >>The problem is this patch is wrong, see below. > >> > >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 26 ++++++++++---------------- > >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c | 3 ++- > >>>>> include/drm/drmP.h | 6 ------ > >>>>> include/drm/drm_drv.h | 1 - > >>>>> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > >>>>> > >>>>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > >>>>>index b5c6bb4..e1da4d1 100644 > >>>>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > >>>>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > >>>>>@@ -355,22 +355,6 @@ void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev) > >>>>> } > >>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_put_dev); > >>>>>-void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev) > >>>>>-{ > >>>>>- /* for a USB device */ > >>>>>- drm_dev_unregister(dev); > >>>>>- > >>>>>- mutex_lock(&drm_global_mutex); > >>>>>- > >>>>>- drm_device_set_unplugged(dev); > >>>>>- > >>>>>- if (dev->open_count == 0) { > >>>>>- drm_put_dev(dev); > >>>>>- } > >>>>>- mutex_unlock(&drm_global_mutex); > >>>>>-} > >>>>>-EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_unplug_dev); > >>>>>- > >>>>> /* > >>>>> * DRM internal mount > >>>>> * We want to be able to allocate our own "struct address_space" > >>>>>to control > >>>>>@@ -733,6 +717,13 @@ static void remove_compat_control_link(struct > >>>>>drm_device *dev) > >>>>> kfree(name); > >>>>> } > >>>>>+static inline void drm_device_set_plug_state(struct drm_device *dev, > >>>>>+ bool plugged) > >>>>>+{ > >>>>>+ smp_wmb(); > >>>>>+ atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, !plugged); > >>>>>+} > >>>>>+ > >>>>> /** > >>>>> * drm_dev_register - Register DRM device > >>>>> * @dev: Device to register > >>>>>@@ -787,6 +778,8 @@ int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, > >>>>>unsigned long flags) > >>>>> if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) > >>>>> drm_modeset_register_all(dev); > >>>>>+ drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, true); > >>>>>+ > >>>>> ret = 0; > >>>>> DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n", > >>>>>@@ -826,6 +819,7 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev) > >>>>> drm_lastclose(dev); > >>>>> dev->registered = false; > >>>>>+ drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, false); > >>>>> if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) > >>>>> drm_modeset_unregister_all(dev); > >>>>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c > >>>>>b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c > >>>>>index cd8b017..fc73e24 100644 > >>>>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c > >>>>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c > >>>>>@@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ static void udl_usb_disconnect(struct > >>>>>usb_interface *interface) > >>>>> drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(dev); > >>>>> udl_fbdev_unplug(dev); > >>>>> udl_drop_usb(dev); > >>>>>- drm_unplug_dev(dev); > >>>>>+ drm_dev_unregister(dev); > >>>>>+ drm_dev_unref(dev); > >> > >>The unref here will cause the device struct to get free-ed even if > >>userspace still holds references to it through the drm_dev. To fix > >>this we would need to call drm_dev_ref on a open from userspace and > >>drm_dev_unref from drm_release. > > > >right, but i think we are already did the ref/unref in the open/release through drm_minor_acquire/drm_minor_release. > > Ah yes, I see. Still calling drm_dev_unregister() directly from > udl_usb_disconnect() is not going to work, see the patch titled > "drm: Fix oops + Xserver hang when unplugging USB drm devices" > > The problem is that drm_dev_unregister() probably should be > split into a drm_dev_unregister() and drm_dev_cleanup() > function with the cleanup part getting called by the last unref, > and at least calling drm_lastclose and the driver->unload call > needs to be moved to the new drm_dev_cleanup. It already is. driver->unload() has been deprecated for a while, in spirit at least, we probably should add a warning to it, and is not meant to be used anymore. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11] drm: Unplug drm device when unregistering it (v8) 2017-06-01 12:22 ` Chris Wilson @ 2017-06-01 12:26 ` Hans de Goede 2017-06-01 13:03 ` Chris Wilson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Hans de Goede @ 2017-06-01 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wilson, jeffy, Sean Paul, linux-kernel, briannorris, dianders, tfiga, zyw, marcheu, mark.yao, hshi, Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, dri-devel, David Airlie, Tom Gundersen, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita, Patrik Jakobsson, Dave Airlie Hi, On 01-06-17 14:22, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:13:28PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 31-05-17 04:39, jeffy wrote: >>> Hi Hans, >>> >>> thanx for investigating :) >>> >>> On 05/30/2017 03:06 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 29-05-17 22:25, Chris Wilson wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:15:04AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 03:32:44PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote: >>>>>>> After unbinding drm, the user space may still owns the drm dev fd, and >>>>>>> may still be able to call drm ioctl. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We're using an unplugged state to prevent something like that, so let's >>>>>>> reuse it here. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also drop drm_unplug_dev, because it would be unused after other >>>>>>> changes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Verified on rk3399 chromebook kevin(with cros 4.4 kernel), no more >>>>>>> crashes >>>>>>> when unbinding drm with ui service still running. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> v2: Fix some commit messages. >>>>>>> v3: Reuse unplug status. >>>>>>> v4: Add drm_device_set_plug_state helper. >>>>>>> v5: Fix hang when unregistering drm dev with open_count 0. >>>>>>> v6: Move drm_device_set_plug_state into drm_drv. >>>>>>> v7: Add missing drm_dev_unref in udl_drv. >>>>>>> v8: Fix compiler errors after enable udl. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Jeffy, >>>>>> Given the trouble we've had with this patch already, coupled with the >>>>>> fact that >>>>>> unbinding while userspace is active is a contrived/pathological case, >>>>>> I don't >>>>>> think it's worth picking this patch upstream. >>>>>> >>>>>> If it's really causing issues downstream, you can add my Reviewed-by >>>>>> for a CHROMIUM >>>>>> patch, but I'd rather not carry patches in the CrOS repo if we don't >>>>>> need to. >>>>> >>>>> Would a >>>>> >>>>> Fixes: a39be606f99d ("drm: Do a full device unregister when unplugging") >>>>> Reported-by: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita <marcodiegomesquita@gmail.com> >>>>> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> >>>>> >>>>> convince us to look into this patch again? >>>> >>>> The problem is this patch is wrong, see below. >>>> >>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 26 ++++++++++---------------- >>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c | 3 ++- >>>>>>> include/drm/drmP.h | 6 ------ >>>>>>> include/drm/drm_drv.h | 1 - >>>>>>> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >>>>>>> index b5c6bb4..e1da4d1 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >>>>>>> @@ -355,22 +355,6 @@ void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev) >>>>>>> } >>>>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_put_dev); >>>>>>> -void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev) >>>>>>> -{ >>>>>>> - /* for a USB device */ >>>>>>> - drm_dev_unregister(dev); >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> - mutex_lock(&drm_global_mutex); >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> - drm_device_set_unplugged(dev); >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> - if (dev->open_count == 0) { >>>>>>> - drm_put_dev(dev); >>>>>>> - } >>>>>>> - mutex_unlock(&drm_global_mutex); >>>>>>> -} >>>>>>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_unplug_dev); >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> /* >>>>>>> * DRM internal mount >>>>>>> * We want to be able to allocate our own "struct address_space" >>>>>>> to control >>>>>>> @@ -733,6 +717,13 @@ static void remove_compat_control_link(struct >>>>>>> drm_device *dev) >>>>>>> kfree(name); >>>>>>> } >>>>>>> +static inline void drm_device_set_plug_state(struct drm_device *dev, >>>>>>> + bool plugged) >>>>>>> +{ >>>>>>> + smp_wmb(); >>>>>>> + atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, !plugged); >>>>>>> +} >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> /** >>>>>>> * drm_dev_register - Register DRM device >>>>>>> * @dev: Device to register >>>>>>> @@ -787,6 +778,8 @@ int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, >>>>>>> unsigned long flags) >>>>>>> if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) >>>>>>> drm_modeset_register_all(dev); >>>>>>> + drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, true); >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> ret = 0; >>>>>>> DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n", >>>>>>> @@ -826,6 +819,7 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev) >>>>>>> drm_lastclose(dev); >>>>>>> dev->registered = false; >>>>>>> + drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, false); >>>>>>> if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) >>>>>>> drm_modeset_unregister_all(dev); >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>>>>>> index cd8b017..fc73e24 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c >>>>>>> @@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ static void udl_usb_disconnect(struct >>>>>>> usb_interface *interface) >>>>>>> drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(dev); >>>>>>> udl_fbdev_unplug(dev); >>>>>>> udl_drop_usb(dev); >>>>>>> - drm_unplug_dev(dev); >>>>>>> + drm_dev_unregister(dev); >>>>>>> + drm_dev_unref(dev); >>>> >>>> The unref here will cause the device struct to get free-ed even if >>>> userspace still holds references to it through the drm_dev. To fix >>>> this we would need to call drm_dev_ref on a open from userspace and >>>> drm_dev_unref from drm_release. >>> >>> right, but i think we are already did the ref/unref in the open/release through drm_minor_acquire/drm_minor_release. >> >> Ah yes, I see. Still calling drm_dev_unregister() directly from >> udl_usb_disconnect() is not going to work, see the patch titled >> "drm: Fix oops + Xserver hang when unplugging USB drm devices" >> >> The problem is that drm_dev_unregister() probably should be >> split into a drm_dev_unregister() and drm_dev_cleanup() >> function with the cleanup part getting called by the last unref, >> and at least calling drm_lastclose and the driver->unload call >> needs to be moved to the new drm_dev_cleanup. > > It already is. driver->unload() has been deprecated for a while, in > spirit at least, we probably should add a warning to it, and is > not meant to be used anymore. Ok, what about drm_lastclose ? Calling that while userspace still has fds open seems wrong too. Same for this part of drm_dev_unregister(): list_for_each_entry_safe(r_list, list_temp, &dev->maplist, head) drm_legacy_rmmap(dev, r_list->map); Removing mmapping backing data (if I understand correctly) while it may still be used seems like a bad idea too, so I do believe that drm_dev_unregister needs some love / some bits moved to the last drm_dev_put call before it will be safe to call it directly on usb-disconnect. Regards, Hans ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11] drm: Unplug drm device when unregistering it (v8) 2017-06-01 12:26 ` Hans de Goede @ 2017-06-01 13:03 ` Chris Wilson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-06-01 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hans de Goede Cc: jeffy, Sean Paul, linux-kernel, briannorris, dianders, tfiga, zyw, marcheu, mark.yao, hshi, Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, dri-devel, David Airlie, Tom Gundersen, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita, Patrik Jakobsson, Dave Airlie On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:26:01PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 01-06-17 14:22, Chris Wilson wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:13:28PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>On 31-05-17 04:39, jeffy wrote: > >>>Hi Hans, > >>> > >>>thanx for investigating :) > >>> > >>>On 05/30/2017 03:06 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>>>Hi, > >>>> > >>>>On 29-05-17 22:25, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>>>>On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:15:04AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > >>>>>>On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 03:32:44PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote: > >>>>>>>After unbinding drm, the user space may still owns the drm dev fd, and > >>>>>>>may still be able to call drm ioctl. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>We're using an unplugged state to prevent something like that, so let's > >>>>>>>reuse it here. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Also drop drm_unplug_dev, because it would be unused after other > >>>>>>>changes. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Verified on rk3399 chromebook kevin(with cros 4.4 kernel), no more > >>>>>>>crashes > >>>>>>>when unbinding drm with ui service still running. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>v2: Fix some commit messages. > >>>>>>>v3: Reuse unplug status. > >>>>>>>v4: Add drm_device_set_plug_state helper. > >>>>>>>v5: Fix hang when unregistering drm dev with open_count 0. > >>>>>>>v6: Move drm_device_set_plug_state into drm_drv. > >>>>>>>v7: Add missing drm_dev_unref in udl_drv. > >>>>>>>v8: Fix compiler errors after enable udl. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>--- > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Hi Jeffy, > >>>>>>Given the trouble we've had with this patch already, coupled with the > >>>>>>fact that > >>>>>>unbinding while userspace is active is a contrived/pathological case, > >>>>>>I don't > >>>>>>think it's worth picking this patch upstream. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>If it's really causing issues downstream, you can add my Reviewed-by > >>>>>>for a CHROMIUM > >>>>>>patch, but I'd rather not carry patches in the CrOS repo if we don't > >>>>>>need to. > >>>>> > >>>>>Would a > >>>>> > >>>>>Fixes: a39be606f99d ("drm: Do a full device unregister when unplugging") > >>>>>Reported-by: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita <marcodiegomesquita@gmail.com> > >>>>>Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> > >>>>> > >>>>>convince us to look into this patch again? > >>>> > >>>>The problem is this patch is wrong, see below. > >>>> > >>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 26 ++++++++++---------------- > >>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c | 3 ++- > >>>>>>> include/drm/drmP.h | 6 ------ > >>>>>>> include/drm/drm_drv.h | 1 - > >>>>>>> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > >>>>>>>index b5c6bb4..e1da4d1 100644 > >>>>>>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > >>>>>>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > >>>>>>>@@ -355,22 +355,6 @@ void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev) > >>>>>>> } > >>>>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_put_dev); > >>>>>>>-void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev) > >>>>>>>-{ > >>>>>>>- /* for a USB device */ > >>>>>>>- drm_dev_unregister(dev); > >>>>>>>- > >>>>>>>- mutex_lock(&drm_global_mutex); > >>>>>>>- > >>>>>>>- drm_device_set_unplugged(dev); > >>>>>>>- > >>>>>>>- if (dev->open_count == 0) { > >>>>>>>- drm_put_dev(dev); > >>>>>>>- } > >>>>>>>- mutex_unlock(&drm_global_mutex); > >>>>>>>-} > >>>>>>>-EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_unplug_dev); > >>>>>>>- > >>>>>>> /* > >>>>>>> * DRM internal mount > >>>>>>> * We want to be able to allocate our own "struct address_space" > >>>>>>>to control > >>>>>>>@@ -733,6 +717,13 @@ static void remove_compat_control_link(struct > >>>>>>>drm_device *dev) > >>>>>>> kfree(name); > >>>>>>> } > >>>>>>>+static inline void drm_device_set_plug_state(struct drm_device *dev, > >>>>>>>+ bool plugged) > >>>>>>>+{ > >>>>>>>+ smp_wmb(); > >>>>>>>+ atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, !plugged); > >>>>>>>+} > >>>>>>>+ > >>>>>>> /** > >>>>>>> * drm_dev_register - Register DRM device > >>>>>>> * @dev: Device to register > >>>>>>>@@ -787,6 +778,8 @@ int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, > >>>>>>>unsigned long flags) > >>>>>>> if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) > >>>>>>> drm_modeset_register_all(dev); > >>>>>>>+ drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, true); > >>>>>>>+ > >>>>>>> ret = 0; > >>>>>>> DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n", > >>>>>>>@@ -826,6 +819,7 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev) > >>>>>>> drm_lastclose(dev); > >>>>>>> dev->registered = false; > >>>>>>>+ drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, false); > >>>>>>> if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) > >>>>>>> drm_modeset_unregister_all(dev); > >>>>>>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c > >>>>>>>b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c > >>>>>>>index cd8b017..fc73e24 100644 > >>>>>>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c > >>>>>>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c > >>>>>>>@@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ static void udl_usb_disconnect(struct > >>>>>>>usb_interface *interface) > >>>>>>> drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(dev); > >>>>>>> udl_fbdev_unplug(dev); > >>>>>>> udl_drop_usb(dev); > >>>>>>>- drm_unplug_dev(dev); > >>>>>>>+ drm_dev_unregister(dev); > >>>>>>>+ drm_dev_unref(dev); > >>>> > >>>>The unref here will cause the device struct to get free-ed even if > >>>>userspace still holds references to it through the drm_dev. To fix > >>>>this we would need to call drm_dev_ref on a open from userspace and > >>>>drm_dev_unref from drm_release. > >>> > >>>right, but i think we are already did the ref/unref in the open/release through drm_minor_acquire/drm_minor_release. > >> > >>Ah yes, I see. Still calling drm_dev_unregister() directly from > >>udl_usb_disconnect() is not going to work, see the patch titled > >>"drm: Fix oops + Xserver hang when unplugging USB drm devices" > >> > >>The problem is that drm_dev_unregister() probably should be > >>split into a drm_dev_unregister() and drm_dev_cleanup() > >>function with the cleanup part getting called by the last unref, > >>and at least calling drm_lastclose and the driver->unload call > >>needs to be moved to the new drm_dev_cleanup. > > > >It already is. driver->unload() has been deprecated for a while, in > >spirit at least, we probably should add a warning to it, and is > >not meant to be used anymore. > > Ok, what about drm_lastclose ? Calling that while userspace still > has fds open seems wrong too. Same for this part of drm_dev_unregister(): lastclose should not be a part of unregister, or it is spectacularly misnamed. > list_for_each_entry_safe(r_list, list_temp, &dev->maplist, head) > drm_legacy_rmmap(dev, r_list->map); Just give Daniel some more fuel for killing legacy, he'll be thankful. > > Removing mmapping backing data (if I understand correctly) while > it may still be used seems like a bad idea too, so I do believe that > drm_dev_unregister needs some love / some bits moved to the last > drm_dev_put call before it will be safe to call it directly > on usb-disconnect. True, it needs more love, and the usb devices are the best test cases for this unless we write some hw independent selftests. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-01 13:04 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-04-13 7:32 [PATCH v11] drm: Unplug drm device when unregistering it (v8) Jeffy Chen 2017-04-14 15:15 ` Sean Paul 2017-05-29 20:25 ` Chris Wilson 2017-05-29 21:18 ` Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita 2017-05-30 7:06 ` Hans de Goede 2017-05-31 2:39 ` jeffy 2017-06-01 12:13 ` Hans de Goede 2017-06-01 12:22 ` Chris Wilson 2017-06-01 12:26 ` Hans de Goede 2017-06-01 13:03 ` Chris Wilson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome