mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@icloud.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] driver core: Mark impossible return values of bus_type's match() with unlikely()
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 23:45:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a1191d5-beaa-4bf6-9f68-4322cab96edf@icloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024090444-earmark-showpiece-b3dc@gregkh>

On 2024/9/4 21:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 08:56:42PM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
>> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
>>
>> Bus_type's match() should return bool type compatible integer 0 or 1
>> ideally since its main operations are lookup and comparison normally
>> actually, this rule is followed by ALL bus_types but @amba_bustype within
>> current v6.10 kernel tree, for @amba_bustype, ONLY extra -EPROBE_DEFER
>> may be returned, so mark those impossible or rare return values with
>> unlikely() to help readers understand device and driver binding logic.
> 
> unlikely() and likely() should ONLY be used when you can measure the
> performance impact.  And any "scan all devices in the bus" function is
> NOT performance critical at all.  So this is not the place for that,
> sorry.
> 

make sense
thank you for these explanation.

>> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/base/dd.c          | 16 ++++++++++++----
>>  include/linux/device/bus.h |  9 ++++-----
>>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
>> index 9b745ba54de1..288e19c9854b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
>> @@ -928,7 +928,11 @@ static int __device_attach_driver(struct device_driver *drv, void *_data)
>>  	if (ret == 0) {
>>  		/* no match */
>>  		return 0;
>> -	} else if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>> +	} else if (unlikely(ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)) {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Only match() of @amba_bustype may return this error
>> +		 * in current v6.10 tree, so also give unlikely() here.
> 
> version numbers in the kernel source mean nothing, and they age
> horribly. This is not going to work out at all.
> 
> let's fix up the one user that is doing this wrong and then we don't
> have to worry about it, right?  We have the source for everything, let's
> use it :)
> 
yes, you are right.

my original motivation is to see if it is possible change bus_type's
match() return value type to bool type based on below reasons:

(1)
it is not good time for bus_type's match() to operate device such as
I/O since device may be not ready to operate at that time.

(2)
match() is called without holding device lock firstly by driver_attach().

(3)
all bus_type's match() only do lookup and comparison and return bool
type but @amba_bustype which operate device and maybe return extra
-EPROBE_DEFER

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h


  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-04 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-04 12:56 [PATCH 0/3] driver core: bus: Fix issues related to bus_rescan_devices_helper() Zijun Hu
2024-09-04 12:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] driver core: Mark impossible return values of bus_type's match() with unlikely() Zijun Hu
2024-09-04 13:53   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-09-04 15:45     ` Zijun Hu [this message]
2024-09-04 12:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] driver core: bus: Give error prompt for storing bus attribute drivers_probe failure Zijun Hu
2024-09-04 12:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] driver core: bus: Correct API bus_rescan_devices() behavior Zijun Hu
2024-09-04 13:54   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-09-04 14:26     ` Zijun Hu
2024-09-04 14:44       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-09-04 15:42         ` Zijun Hu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5a1191d5-beaa-4bf6-9f68-4322cab96edf@icloud.com \
    --to=zijun_hu@icloud.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®