Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: qcom: add initial support for qcom sa8255p-ride

[Deepti Jaggi <quic_djaggi@quicinc.com>]

On 4/24/25 22:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 25/04/2025 06:53, Deepti Jaggi wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/23/25 23:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 23/04/2025 01:12, Deepti Jaggi wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8255p-ride.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8255p-ride.dts
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..cb866f897d0a
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8255p-ride.dts
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2024-2025 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +/dts-v1/;
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#include "sa8255p.dtsi"
>>>> +#include "sa8255p-pmics.dtsi"
>>>> +#include "sa8255p-scmi.dtsi"
>>>> +
>>>> +/ {
>>>> +	model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SA8255P Ride";
>>>> +	compatible = "qcom,sa8255p-ride", "qcom,sa8255p";
>>>
>>> NAK
>>>
>>> Missing bindings. This is some weird process you have there. Reach to
>>> your internal guideline before you start posting. It explains this.
>>>
>>
>> I followed the approach used for other bindings [1] [2] [3], 
>> which were part of the original series and were sent as separate patches 
>> and accepted. I misjudged that the SoC binding could also be sent as a 
>> separate patch. I will combine the remaining bindings along with 
>> the device tree into a single series.
>>  
>> The UART/QUP driver changes have been posted as a separate series [4] 
>> along with the UART bindings. Please advise if the UART/QUP bindings should
>> also be included as part of next series with dt changes.
> 
> I think existing docs have it well covered and explained. I advise to
> read all submitting patches documents.

Sure, thanks

> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof