From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Yihang Li <liyihang9@huawei.com>,
john.g.garry@oracle.com, yanaijie@huawei.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, chenxiang66@hisilicon.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxarm@huawei.com, prime.zeng@huawei.com,
yangxingui@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: libsas: Allocation SMP request is aligned to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 22:14:11 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b5b9392-7fd2-4c87-8e41-5e54adf20003@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240326124358.2466259-1-liyihang9@huawei.com>
On 3/26/24 21:43, Yihang Li wrote:
> This series [1] reducing the kmalloc() minimum alignment on arm64 to 8
> (from 128). In libsas, this will cause SMP requests to be 8-byte-aligned
> through kmalloc() allocation. However, for the hisi_sas hardware, all
> commands address must be 16-byte-aligned. Otherwise, the commands fail to
> be executed.
>
> ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN represents the minimum (static) alignment for safe DMA
> operations, so use ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN as the alignment for SMP request.
>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230612153201.554742-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com [1]
> Signed-off-by: Yihang Li <liyihang9@huawei.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Directly modify alloc_smp_req() instead of using handler callback.
> ---
> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> index a2204674b680..941abc7298df 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> @@ -135,7 +135,10 @@ static int smp_execute_task(struct domain_device *dev, void *req, int req_size,
>
> static inline void *alloc_smp_req(int size)
> {
> - u8 *p = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + u8 *p;
> +
> + size = ALIGN(size, ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN);
> + p = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
Nit: why not:
p = kzalloc(ALIGN(size, ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (p)
> p[0] = SMP_REQUEST;
> return p;
Otherwise looks OK to me.
John,
Unrelated to this patch, but I wonder if the GFP_KERNEL used here shouldn't be
GFP_NOIO... Is this ever called in the IO path or error recovery ?
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-26 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-26 12:43 Yihang Li
2024-03-26 13:14 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2024-03-26 13:32 ` John Garry
2024-03-26 13:40 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-03-28 6:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 6:59 ` Yihang Li
2024-03-28 7:23 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-03-28 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 7:36 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-03-28 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 8:00 ` Yihang Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5b5b9392-7fd2-4c87-8e41-5e54adf20003@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=liyihang9@huawei.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@huawei.com \
--cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
--cc=yangxingui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®