From: Yihang Li <liyihang9@huawei.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>, <yanaijie@huawei.com>,
<jejb@linux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
<chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<prime.zeng@huawei.com>, <yangxingui@huawei.com>,
<liyihang9@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: libsas: Allocation SMP request is aligned to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:59:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75df3e2d-10c3-5370-3cd8-fe2fb0ff2acc@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZgUPpwhkE9bRwHec@infradead.org>
On 2024/3/28 14:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 01:32:09PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
>>>> + u8 *p;
>>>> +
>>>> + size = ALIGN(size, ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN);
>>
>>
>> If this is a hisi_sas requirement, then why use ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN and not
>> 16B as minimum alignment?
>>
>> Or are we really talking about an arch requirement?
>
> One thing is that we should never allocate unaligned memory for
> anything DMA mapped, or data will be corrupted by non-coherent DMA.
> So ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN needs to be here. If specific hardware has
> further requirements we'll need to communicated it through a field
> or op vector.
Got it. Looks like it's still going to be aligned to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN.
Thanks,
Yihang
>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-28 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-26 12:43 Yihang Li
2024-03-26 13:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-03-26 13:32 ` John Garry
2024-03-26 13:40 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-03-28 6:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 6:59 ` Yihang Li [this message]
2024-03-28 7:23 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-03-28 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 7:36 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-03-28 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 8:00 ` Yihang Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75df3e2d-10c3-5370-3cd8-fe2fb0ff2acc@huawei.com \
--to=liyihang9@huawei.com \
--cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@huawei.com \
--cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
--cc=yangxingui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®